| Home formation vs Away formation 10:45 - Aug 21 with 201 views | Mullet |
Are we likely to go down this route this season? I'm always in two minds about having the consistency of a system and having the depth to change and counter teams.
Given how thin we are on the ground I can't see it really working for a side like ours. How many versatile players do we have after all? Edwards, Martin, JET to a degree I guess. |  |
| |  |
| Home formation vs Away formation on 11:00 - Aug 21 with 168 views | olimar |
Its not just about the versatility of the players who switch positions, but about those around them who are able to adapt to team mates playing in new positions/different team mates.
We arent particularly adept at that part in the first place. |  | | |
| Home formation vs Away formation on 11:14 - Aug 21 with 158 views | pazelle |
4231 unless we're behind with 30 minutes left as a general strategy. |  | | |
| Home formation vs Away formation on 11:18 - Aug 21 with 157 views | Mullet |
| Home formation vs Away formation on 11:00 - Aug 21 by olimar |
Its not just about the versatility of the players who switch positions, but about those around them who are able to adapt to team mates playing in new positions/different team mates.
We arent particularly adept at that part in the first place. |
The only switch I can really think of is one Keane had some limited success with first and Jewell really improved upon which was bringing Scotland on as an "impact sub".
Now he's much fitter and over those niggling injuries and weight gain when he joined us he looks a different proposition to throw at teams. Switching to a more traditional 442 as the game draws to a close seems the closest we have to any kind of tactical changes under Jewell mid game. | |
| |
| |
