Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:50 - Jan 1 with 3429 views | LancsBlue | Can I be the first to offer him a lift? | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:51 - Jan 1 with 3407 views | Superfrans |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:50 - Jan 1 by LancsBlue | Can I be the first to offer him a lift? |
Fans like you are a bigger problem at this club than players like Chambers. Can I drive you to Wolverhampton please? | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:57 - Jan 1 with 3314 views | fabian_illness | Whatever anyone thinks of him, he's served this club with pride and passion. He'd be a big loss to us. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:59 - Jan 1 with 3279 views | Barneycurley |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:57 - Jan 1 by fabian_illness | Whatever anyone thinks of him, he's served this club with pride and passion. He'd be a big loss to us. |
ut diminishes season after season. but i guess thats the boss's fault also | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:00 - Jan 1 with 3262 views | EastTownBlue | He signed a contract until 2017 with an option for a further 12 months which I assume that we can trigger. The last time that he signed a new contract this was following speculation of a move elsewhere in the press so probably is work of an agent. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:02 - Jan 1 with 3231 views | hoppy |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:51 - Jan 1 by Superfrans | Fans like you are a bigger problem at this club than players like Chambers. Can I drive you to Wolverhampton please? |
Facters could probably take him, as he's more likely on his way there anyway... | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:03 - Jan 1 with 3217 views | Keaneish |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:57 - Jan 1 by fabian_illness | Whatever anyone thinks of him, he's served this club with pride and passion. He'd be a big loss to us. |
If he was playing at centre back he'd be a huge loss for us, at right back he isn't. Personally I'd rather the interest was in Skuse as I think Webster would be great to fill Skuse's role and would free up the spot alongside Berra for Chambers, giving us the opportunity to get a proper right back in or give Emmanuel more game time to develop. | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:03 - Jan 1 with 3208 views | Kieran_Knows | Think we've got an additional year option on his existing deal, which I'm pretty sure we'd trigger. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:11 - Jan 1 with 3111 views | bournemouthblue | Interesting | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:14 - Jan 1 with 3069 views | TLA | I think Chambers has played a really important role in uniting the fans and the club after the dark days at the end of PJ's tenure. Now I'd really like him to challenge for one of the centre back spots with a new right back to compete with Emmanuel. If he leaves, our cover at centre back looks very short with Smith still out. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:15 - Jan 1 with 3064 views | bournemouthblue |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:03 - Jan 1 by Keaneish | If he was playing at centre back he'd be a huge loss for us, at right back he isn't. Personally I'd rather the interest was in Skuse as I think Webster would be great to fill Skuse's role and would free up the spot alongside Berra for Chambers, giving us the opportunity to get a proper right back in or give Emmanuel more game time to develop. |
You'd move our best centre back into central midfield? I don't doubt he could do it but he has the potential to go right to the top as a centre back | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:16 - Jan 1 with 3048 views | Bluebell |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:51 - Jan 1 by Superfrans | Fans like you are a bigger problem at this club than players like Chambers. Can I drive you to Wolverhampton please? |
Agreed. Why would anyone want one of longest serving players to go? No matter what people think of him, he is passionate, playing out of position and like all players, has bad games. I, for one, would hate him to leave so I hope Luke, Mick and ME think the same. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:17 - Jan 1 with 3033 views | brogansnose | Can't see Mick letting him go and certainly not until Smithy is back. It would also leave us without much cover at RB and with the CB's. Won't happen. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:23 - Jan 1 with 2968 views | factual_blue |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:17 - Jan 1 by brogansnose | Can't see Mick letting him go and certainly not until Smithy is back. It would also leave us without much cover at RB and with the CB's. Won't happen. |
Looks like standard agent stuff to me. Create a plausible rumour, try and squeeze a bit more out of your existing club. | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:25 - Jan 1 with 2939 views | brogansnose |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:23 - Jan 1 by factual_blue | Looks like standard agent stuff to me. Create a plausible rumour, try and squeeze a bit more out of your existing club. |
Agents. What would journalists do without them and vice versa. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:27 - Jan 1 with 2913 views | Superfrans |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:57 - Jan 1 by fabian_illness | Whatever anyone thinks of him, he's served this club with pride and passion. He'd be a big loss to us. |
Indeed. He's an important catalyst for the excellent team spirit we have. We overlook that at our peril. I'd give him an extended contract, moving into coaching, which is something he is definitely interested in. Even if he doesn't play every game, he should be club captain. | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:28 - Jan 1 with 2886 views | factual_blue |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:25 - Jan 1 by brogansnose | Agents. What would journalists do without them and vice versa. |
Agents aren't gents. But then neither are journalists. | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:38 - Jan 1 with 2793 views | Keaneish |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:15 - Jan 1 by bournemouthblue | You'd move our best centre back into central midfield? I don't doubt he could do it but he has the potential to go right to the top as a centre back |
I've no doubt he will go to the top. Would it improve our starting 11 by moving him there and Chambers to centre back? I'd argue it would. Besides, Rio Ferdinand played in central midfield for spells in his younger days. I think spells playing this role would improve Webster, add to his value and give Skuse competition for a place. Lots of benefits to opening this up for debate I think. | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:39 - Jan 1 with 2815 views | DebenBlue | As I have mentioned in the News section Luke has been asking the club since the summer do they intend to extend his contract, up until a week or so before Christmas they had declined any form of discussions, therefore I would guess there is substance in the story or Luke's agent is trying to apply some pressure. Either way I feel that he deserves to know where he stands. With Berra leaving and Webster having premier league suitors we could be woefully short of centre halves come the summer. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:58 - Jan 1 with 2658 views | Wickets |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 10:59 - Jan 1 by Barneycurley | ut diminishes season after season. but i guess thats the boss's fault also |
Well its the boss who plays him out of position , not that Luke complains about it just seems to get on with the job best he can. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 12:15 - Jan 1 with 2504 views | LancsBlue |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:16 - Jan 1 by Bluebell | Agreed. Why would anyone want one of longest serving players to go? No matter what people think of him, he is passionate, playing out of position and like all players, has bad games. I, for one, would hate him to leave so I hope Luke, Mick and ME think the same. |
According to that logic if we kept him another five years he would be even more indispensable. Passion and commitment alone do not make a great footballer. We have the chance to get some money for him now or quite possibly let him go for nothing in the summer. Things need freshening up and Chambers is part of a rather uninspiring past, not our future. Let him go. With such a dominant personality moved on it would give others a chance to step up. | |
| |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 12:27 - Jan 1 with 2415 views | Archer4721 |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 12:15 - Jan 1 by LancsBlue | According to that logic if we kept him another five years he would be even more indispensable. Passion and commitment alone do not make a great footballer. We have the chance to get some money for him now or quite possibly let him go for nothing in the summer. Things need freshening up and Chambers is part of a rather uninspiring past, not our future. Let him go. With such a dominant personality moved on it would give others a chance to step up. |
Indeed. Some fans get too misty eyed about players.They give a fist pump or two but that doesn't make them great players and in the end he's a footballer who would be off at the slightest chance of a better deal elsewhere. Players come and go and I agree maybe the time is right now to let him go. And tbh it does seem if he is the one trying to engineer a move. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 13:26 - Jan 1 with 2170 views | OsborneOneNil |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 11:38 - Jan 1 by Keaneish | I've no doubt he will go to the top. Would it improve our starting 11 by moving him there and Chambers to centre back? I'd argue it would. Besides, Rio Ferdinand played in central midfield for spells in his younger days. I think spells playing this role would improve Webster, add to his value and give Skuse competition for a place. Lots of benefits to opening this up for debate I think. |
Totally agree, posted the same a few weeks back. Webster would be a massive upgrade on Skuse in the holding role. Far better footballer. | | | |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 13:28 - Jan 1 with 2159 views | Superfrans |
Wolves after Chambers apparantly on 12:27 - Jan 1 by Archer4721 | Indeed. Some fans get too misty eyed about players.They give a fist pump or two but that doesn't make them great players and in the end he's a footballer who would be off at the slightest chance of a better deal elsewhere. Players come and go and I agree maybe the time is right now to let him go. And tbh it does seem if he is the one trying to engineer a move. |
Anyone who saw any of the Jewell era can't surely forget how important he has been (and still is) to team cohesion and team spirit. Even if he isn't a long term first choice at RB or CH, he's a key Part of the squad. I'd be doing everything possible to keep him, even as a club captain and bit part player, evolving into some kind of coach role. | |
| |
| |