| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:07 - Jan 14 with 1694 views | jeera |
So that's Lawrence up front? I guess Mick's thinking he's the one with our best chance of goals atm. Maybe Sears will get some confidence from him. |  |
|  |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:09 - Jan 14 with 1668 views | GeoffSentence |
5-4-1 ? |  |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:11 - Jan 14 with 1623 views | christiand |
3-5-2? |  |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:11 - Jan 14 with 1611 views | Hipsterectomy |
Am I being dumb? Who is Webber? |  |
| Walter Smith's Barmy Army |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:12 - Jan 14 with 1603 views | Guthrum |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:09 - Jan 14 by GeoffSentence |
5-4-1 ? |
Depends whether Lawrence is out on the left, or more central and further forwards. |  |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:14 - Jan 14 with 1569 views | GeoffSentence |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:11 - Jan 14 by Hipsterectomy |
Am I being dumb? Who is Webber? |
Young defender I think, he was on the bench for the Lincoln game. [Post edited 14 Jan 2017 14:14]
| |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:15 - Jan 14 with 1526 views | Guthrum |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:11 - Jan 14 by Hipsterectomy |
Am I being dumb? Who is Webber? |
Pat Webber, Youth left back. Was on the bench for the Cup game. | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:15 - Jan 14 with 1527 views | Steve_M |
No focal point up front, someone needs to stay forward it it'll be a mess. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:18 - Jan 14 with 1444 views | Mullet |
I presume it's 3 at the back, which after QPR might be Mick forced/wanting to give it another airing.
However he did once put Mings and Cresswell down the flank at Burnley and I could see him doing that with Emmanuel to keep it two banks of 4.
I can only see that it'll be 343 again though with Lawrence and Sears crisscrossing Andre as the deeper attacker. Hopefully it'll pull them out of shape and not the other way around. |  |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:19 - Jan 14 with 1440 views | jeera |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:15 - Jan 14 by Steve_M |
No focal point up front, someone needs to stay forward it it'll be a mess. |
Looking a bit makeshift isn't it?
But youngsters coming into the fold thick and fast.
How do you look a that? Exciting or lightweight? | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:20 - Jan 14 with 1415 views | Guthrum |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:15 - Jan 14 by Steve_M |
No focal point up front, someone needs to stay forward it it'll be a mess. |
I imagine Sears will be the designated striker. Feel it would tie Lawrence down too much if he had that role. | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:22 - Jan 14 with 1377 views | NSL |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:19 - Jan 14 by jeera |
Looking a bit makeshift isn't it?
But youngsters coming into the fold thick and fast.
How do you look a that? Exciting or lightweight? |
It would be exciting if our youngsters were good, but unfortunately they are just youngsters. Not on the same level as Bent, Ambrose, Dyer, R Wright etc atc | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:22 - Jan 14 with 1361 views | Vic |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:19 - Jan 14 by jeera |
Looking a bit makeshift isn't it?
But youngsters coming into the fold thick and fast.
How do you look a that? Exciting or lightweight? |
Both! Many a yongster has come in in an emergency and surprised everyone. bishop being the latest. With someone like Mick it may be the best thing. I think it's exciting personally. |  |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:23 - Jan 14 with 1344 views | Guthrum |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:19 - Jan 14 by jeera |
Looking a bit makeshift isn't it?
But youngsters coming into the fold thick and fast.
How do you look a that? Exciting or lightweight? |
A bit of both, really. But that's the price of playing the youngsters whom everyone wants to see and are the future of the club. | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:24 - Jan 14 with 1316 views | Guthrum |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:22 - Jan 14 by NSL |
It would be exciting if our youngsters were good, but unfortunately they are just youngsters. Not on the same level as Bent, Ambrose, Dyer, R Wright etc atc |
How do we know, yet? | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:43 - Jan 14 with 1178 views | NSL |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:24 - Jan 14 by Guthrum |
How do we know, yet? |
I'm sorry but very good youngsters do not need 20 chances to show if they are good or not. Did Dozell touch the ball on Saturday? Horrible to admit it but or youngsters are average these days. I want a prodigy to appear like anyone else but we don't have it | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:45 - Jan 14 with 1156 views | Mullet |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:43 - Jan 14 by NSL |
I'm sorry but very good youngsters do not need 20 chances to show if they are good or not. Did Dozell touch the ball on Saturday? Horrible to admit it but or youngsters are average these days. I want a prodigy to appear like anyone else but we don't have it |
You clearly don't remember the first seasons of some of those you listed very well, or take into account they were put into a much better and settled team.
The idea that every youngster has to live up to the best we've produced to be useful is silly too. Snr was telling me on the drive to QPR how Beattie was full of mistakes as a kid but SBR persisted.
Imagine that. | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:52 - Jan 14 with 1104 views | jeera |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:45 - Jan 14 by Mullet |
You clearly don't remember the first seasons of some of those you listed very well, or take into account they were put into a much better and settled team.
The idea that every youngster has to live up to the best we've produced to be useful is silly too. Snr was telling me on the drive to QPR how Beattie was full of mistakes as a kid but SBR persisted.
Imagine that. |
This is the problem with unrealistic fans, (not referring to matey here).
Those screaming for Dozzel the other week as though he was some obvious saviour just couldn't seem to fathom that's he's a kid who needs to be introduced gradually and correctly.
Like they just wander into the side fully developed... | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:54 - Jan 14 with 1085 views | monty_radio |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:45 - Jan 14 by Mullet |
You clearly don't remember the first seasons of some of those you listed very well, or take into account they were put into a much better and settled team.
The idea that every youngster has to live up to the best we've produced to be useful is silly too. Snr was telling me on the drive to QPR how Beattie was full of mistakes as a kid but SBR persisted.
Imagine that. |
Not as I remember it, but time can play tricks. Beattie was a force of nature from the off in the 72-3 season. Agree with the more general point though. | |
| |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 15:08 - Jan 14 with 1012 views | connorscontract |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:52 - Jan 14 by jeera |
This is the problem with unrealistic fans, (not referring to matey here).
Those screaming for Dozzel the other week as though he was some obvious saviour just couldn't seem to fathom that's he's a kid who needs to be introduced gradually and correctly.
Like they just wander into the side fully developed... |
Plus Bishop missed a whole season with a stress injury even though he had hardly played a full 90 minutes. Bones don't fuse before around 21 years of age and professional football is highly attritional. Young players need the cotton wool approach for the sake of the longevity of their careers. | | | |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 15:56 - Jan 14 with 835 views | Guthrum |
| That's quite an interesting lineup! on 14:43 - Jan 14 by NSL |
I'm sorry but very good youngsters do not need 20 chances to show if they are good or not. Did Dozell touch the ball on Saturday? Horrible to admit it but or youngsters are average these days. I want a prodigy to appear like anyone else but we don't have it |
Dozzell hasn't played 10 games for Ipswich yet. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
