If a new manager was appointed 17:37 - Jan 22 with 1791 views | TheSelkirk | (and let's assume he just happened to be your first choice), would you still support him if he agreed with MM that Skuse and Douglas were the team's best midfield options? | | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:42 - Jan 22 with 1744 views | Ftnfwest | No I wouldn't, but to prevent it I'd make it the first interview question | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:46 - Jan 22 with 1723 views | BlueBadger | It depends on what the rest of the team was set up like. [Post edited 22 Jan 2017 18:24]
| |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:49 - Jan 22 with 1695 views | taximan |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:46 - Jan 22 by BlueBadger | It depends on what the rest of the team was set up like. [Post edited 22 Jan 2017 18:24]
|
SPEND ALL THE MUNNY SPEND IT NOW etc etc | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:57 - Jan 22 with 1651 views | taximan |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:49 - Jan 22 by taximan | SPEND ALL THE MUNNY SPEND IT NOW etc etc |
dreaded arrows of hate are you mad have you forgotten how hilarious these type of posts were back in the day ? | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:02 - Jan 22 with 1624 views | textbackup | No, I would instantly dislike him, because even stevie wonder can see that pairing fails terribly | |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:09 - Jan 22 with 1585 views | TheSelkirk |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:57 - Jan 22 by taximan | dreaded arrows of hate are you mad have you forgotten how hilarious these type of posts were back in the day ? |
I was interested to see how people might think if their perfect manager suported a similar view to MM. Fairly innocuous post I thought but I guess I shouldn't be surprised that it’s possible to attract negative responses on this forum whatever the subject. | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:09 - Jan 22 with 1591 views | BlueBadger |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:57 - Jan 22 by taximan | dreaded arrows of hate are you mad have you forgotten how hilarious these type of posts were back in the day ? |
Oh DO give over, you massive fanny. | |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:10 - Jan 22 with 1578 views | BlueBadger |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:09 - Jan 22 by TheSelkirk | I was interested to see how people might think if their perfect manager suported a similar view to MM. Fairly innocuous post I thought but I guess I shouldn't be surprised that it’s possible to attract negative responses on this forum whatever the subject. |
Oh, don't worry about that sensitive flower up there. [Post edited 22 Jan 2017 18:14]
| |
| | Login to get fewer ads
If a new manager was appointed on 18:14 - Jan 22 with 1554 views | taximan |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:09 - Jan 22 by BlueBadger | Oh DO give over, you massive fanny. |
surely you are not backtracking in your thinking that the club don't need to spend money to improve the squad ? | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:15 - Jan 22 with 1551 views | factual_blue |
If a new manager was appointed on 17:42 - Jan 22 by Ftnfwest | No I wouldn't, but to prevent it I'd make it the first interview question |
Sorry - it would have to be at best the second question. The Cheese Question is obviously first. | |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:23 - Jan 22 with 1507 views | Ftnfwest |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:15 - Jan 22 by factual_blue | Sorry - it would have to be at best the second question. The Cheese Question is obviously first. |
Correct, which clearly carries an instant pass/fail status | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:23 - Jan 22 with 1503 views | BlueBadger |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:14 - Jan 22 by taximan | surely you are not backtracking in your thinking that the club don't need to spend money to improve the squad ? |
No, I'm suggesting you stop being a massive fanny. | |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:28 - Jan 22 with 1485 views | J2BLUE | If they were the two in a 4231, the 3 and 1 were attacking players, they were told to play it on the floor and coached to do this and would be dropped if they were playing badly then yes. | |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:29 - Jan 22 with 1478 views | BlueBadger |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:28 - Jan 22 by J2BLUE | If they were the two in a 4231, the 3 and 1 were attacking players, they were told to play it on the floor and coached to do this and would be dropped if they were playing badly then yes. |
If we were playing very adventurous full backs I could see a place for them as a pairing in a 4-3-3 with a ver attacking central player too. Definitely not in a 4-4-2, mind. You need someone on the centre to go up and down a bit to make some space. [Post edited 22 Jan 2017 18:38]
| |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:33 - Jan 22 with 1442 views | jas0999 | It's highly unlikely that anyone but an incompetent person would think Douglas /Skuse are the teams best midfield option. | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:36 - Jan 22 with 1419 views | The_Romford_Blue | I don't even think mick thinks them both together in a 2 are the best midfield option. Unfortunately we've had many injuries to Bish and Williams who would both be ahead of Douglas. Skuse in a two man midfield is a must but it's about getting someone alongside him. | |
| |
If a new manager was appointed on 19:29 - Jan 22 with 1251 views | superfan | There is no chance of my first choice picking Douglas at all, let alone with Skuse. | | | |
If a new manager was appointed on 19:36 - Jan 22 with 1225 views | taximan |
If a new manager was appointed on 18:23 - Jan 22 by BlueBadger | No, I'm suggesting you stop being a massive fanny. |
oh i see do you not like being proved wrong ? massively wrong | | | |
| |