Sunday times 09:47 - Mar 26 with 3648 views | vapour_trail | Front page, picture of the 18 year old daughter of the London attacker in a very revealing dress.. Why is that acceptable? She must have had her life ripped apart this week. | |
| | |
Sunday times on 11:53 - Mar 26 with 941 views | BlueBadger |
Sunday times on 11:49 - Mar 26 by FrowsyArmLarry | Plenty of the victims have been featured in news articles, I'm not sure what your point is? |
My point is, that none of the rest of them are being held up as valid targets for abuse by idiots. [Post edited 26 Mar 2017 11:53]
| |
| |
Sunday times on 11:55 - Mar 26 with 929 views | StokieBlue |
Sunday times on 10:05 - Mar 26 by vapour_trail | Bullocks mate. It's a bit of teenage tit on the front cover to shift a few copies. |
Just googled it and you're completely right. No need at all for her to even be mentioned, let alone a FB trawled photo like that to be stuck on the front cover. SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
Sunday times on 11:58 - Mar 26 with 920 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
Sunday times on 11:38 - Mar 26 by FrowsyArmLarry | You are conveniently forgetting that this government campaigned to stay in the EU and claimed it would be financial suicide to leave. It is the Labour voters that swung the vote, prompted by Corbyns lack of action. |
You've misspelt ' Corbyn's honest 7/10 rating of the EU ' | |
| |
Sunday times on 12:35 - Mar 26 with 883 views | factual_blue | Just had the misfortune to see this thread without the benefit of the moron filter. Some people disgust me with their small-minded ignorance. [Post edited 26 Mar 2017 12:36]
| |
| |
Sunday times on 16:07 - Mar 26 with 771 views | Garv |
Sunday times on 11:15 - Mar 26 by BergholtBru | No, not really. But the "likes of you" seem more concerned about her than the victims families. |
Can't people talk about the two things in isolation? | |
| |
| |