| Murthy Fee 18:13 - May 23 with 2527 views | Wickets |
Just read in the Newcastle chronical that the final fee was 4mill after Newcastle promotion clause triggerd. Now i may be wrong but did Town say that their is no promotion clause in the deal and that the fee was 3mill? |  | | |  |
| Murthy Fee on 18:26 - May 23 with 2483 views | Benters |
Who? |  |
| |
| Murthy Fee on 18:53 - May 23 with 2426 views | Wickets |
| Murthy Fee on 18:26 - May 23 by Benters |
Who? |
P to you | | | |
| Murthy Fee on 18:56 - May 23 with 2433 views | PhilTWTD |
Yes, I asked again today, no promotion clause. If there were one I suspect they'd be quite open to saying the fee had been bigger. |  | | |
| Murthy Fee on 19:17 - May 23 with 2369 views | ArnieM |
| Murthy Fee on 18:56 - May 23 by PhilTWTD |
Yes, I asked again today, no promotion clause. If there were one I suspect they'd be quite open to saying the fee had been bigger. |
but did actually get any fee for Murphy ? Only someone on here said a week or so ago that we didn't...... |  |
| |
| Murthy Fee on 19:19 - May 23 with 2353 views | WeWereZombies |
| Murthy Fee on 18:26 - May 23 by Benters |
Who? |
You know, Titman's strike tartner... |  |
| |
| Murthy Fee on 19:51 - May 23 with 2277 views | PhilTWTD |
| Murthy Fee on 19:17 - May 23 by ArnieM |
but did actually get any fee for Murphy ? Only someone on here said a week or so ago that we didn't...... |
No idea what that was about, fee was £3m. | | | |
| Murthy Fee on 21:02 - May 23 with 2111 views | HARRY10 |
| Murthy Fee on 19:51 - May 23 by PhilTWTD |
No idea what that was about, fee was £3m. |
I suspect Murphy himself would have received a bonus for being part of the squad, though how much is not known. |  | | |
| Murthy Fee on 11:22 - May 24 with 1858 views | Wickets |
| Murthy Fee on 18:56 - May 23 by PhilTWTD |
Yes, I asked again today, no promotion clause. If there were one I suspect they'd be quite open to saying the fee had been bigger. |
Thanks Phil | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Murthy Fee on 11:26 - May 24 with 1848 views | ITFCBlues |
| Murthy Fee on 18:56 - May 23 by PhilTWTD |
Yes, I asked again today, no promotion clause. If there were one I suspect they'd be quite open to saying the fee had been bigger. |
Why would they be open about it though? Teams then know we've got more money to spend! |  |
| |
| Murthy Fee on 11:36 - May 24 with 1829 views | Benters |
| Murthy Fee on 19:19 - May 23 by WeWereZombies |
You know, Titman's strike tartner... |
Oh right! | |
| |
| Murthy Fee on 11:58 - May 24 with 1798 views | PhilTWTD |
| Murthy Fee on 11:26 - May 24 by ITFCBlues |
Why would they be open about it though? Teams then know we've got more money to spend! |
Perhaps, but at the same time clubs tend to like to let it be known when a deal has come off in that manner. Town have consistently dismissed it ever since it was first reported shortly after the deal went through last year and, to be fair, Sky seem to have been only source to have reported it, everyone else has just reported that they reported it. | | | |
| Murthy Fee on 11:59 - May 24 with 1796 views | PhilTWTD |
| Murthy Fee on 21:02 - May 23 by HARRY10 |
I suspect Murphy himself would have received a bonus for being part of the squad, though how much is not known. |
Yes, I'm sure he has. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
