Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
How Mick McCarthy Accelerated His Own Departure
Written by HarryfromBath on Sunday, 1st Apr 2018 10:44

HarryFromBath charts how three aspects of Mick McCarthy’s management style may have conspired to play a significant role in his exit from the club.

Celebrity adulation has never ceased to fascinate me. On so many occasions working in the book trade I have seen readers walking up to a beloved author with trepidation to get a book signed with the author smiling benignly at a stranger who feels they have a deep connection with them.

If this seems rather odd, think of what it must be like for football managers. Replace beloved readers for a thousand or so passionate supporters lacking patience and perspective, many with only a basic and tangential knowledge of playing the game, and you are in an irrational world most of the time.

As a Dubliner with a deep admiration for Mick following his 2002 World Cup exploits and with a sad enthusiasm for small tactical details, his arrival at Ipswich in 2012 was delightful. Press conferences were littered with pearls of wisdom and his small tactical adjustments during games were manna from heaven. I was secretly and romantically hoping for a successful cup run and a statue.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Three things marked out Mick’s management style. He was intuitively strong at spotting and quickly nullifying opposition threats and dangers, often making switches or substitutions within seconds as he had anticipated an opposing manager's chess moves. The prioritising of the elimination of risk was vital in his early days as a chaotically inherited team needed organising and structure.

The concept of control was a strong motif in his world both on and off the pitch. His paternalistic style quickly became apparent, and when I brought my partner to watch our Jonny Williams-inspired win over Derby in 2014, she noted how tactical discipline played an over-arching role in the side’s make-up, with only Williams and Stephen Hunt expressing their personality with any great freedom.

The control paradigm stretched into the close collegiate world of his dressing room. I have heard ex-players talk time and again about creating strong bonds of trust on the pitch, and this was pivotal in Mick’s thinking. It was also possible to be excluded from this world. The departures of Michael Chopra and JET were unsurprising and we all nodded knowingly when Cameron Stewart was quietly sidelined.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Little did we realise at the time but it was also possible for fans to be excluded from this close-knit world. The first obvious instances were Mick’s disagreements with supporters after the August 2016 defeat at Brentford and the drawn Norwich game at Portman Road two weeks later. I remember being horrified about the Brentford incident in particular but it was to be the start of a pattern.

As other teams overtook us and the football stagnated in the 2016/17 season, there was a growing schism between Mick and an increasing proportion of the fanbase. Every so often there would be an emetic release such as after the humiliation at Lincoln in the FA Cup. The fanbase also grew ever more divided with the manager’s approach becoming as defensive off the pitch as the teams on it.

It has to be said that our growing relative weakness on the pitch in the division didn’t help. As we declined in status from promotion hopefuls, the former certainties of being organised and efficient took hold. We reverted to a grim version of the unbalanced team Mick reshaped after his arrival, getting safe and grinding out results. Nullifying opponents became the objective in many games.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mick’s growing hostility to the fans was a shock in the 2016/17 season and it established a pattern which really took hold in this campaign, alienating an increasing proportion of the wider and more patient fanbase. Looking back now, I believe his foul-mouthed outburst after our win at Burton in October drove an immovable wedge between him and the supporters and sealed his fate.

“Bobby Robson would have turned in his grave if he thought that any Town manager would speak like that.” It wasn’t just middle-of-the-road fans who were confused by now. Loyal diehards such as myself felt that we were getting the Cameron Stewart treatment. The gently inquisitive local press was being treated with defensiveness, suspicion and occasional hostility as the weeks went by.

Things came to a head around the Sheffield United and Hull games this month, but the outcome was inevitable in hindsight. In a game which was crying out for an Ian Holloway approach, Mick decided to take the cautious route against the Blades – matching up opponents and stopping them playing – as one poster described it this weekend, trying to mug a 1-0 win built on solid heroic defending.

The wins over Watford and Aston Villa will linger long in the memory, but you cannot build a play-off or promotion campaign on these foundations. It felt like Mick had given up on promotion when the supporters had not, and it also felt as if his circling the wagons on the pitch after the Hull defeat was the moment he lost the remaining fans. He didn’t lose the dressing room, but he lost everyone else.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This potential divide between the dressing room and the supporters is a source of profound danger. One of the most telling moments in Thursday’s press conference was Mick’s reflexive “absolutely” when asked if Bart or Jonas might rethink renewing their contracts. In Mick’s thinking, they were in his world and not ours, so why should they be loyal to the club or its supporters?

I felt that the other telling and related moment in that conference was when he highlighted the pattern of decline and relegation after he left previous clubs, but this may not be a surprise given how his approach here mirrored his time both at Wolves and Sunderland. I ran my thinking past fans of both clubs and it wasn’t long before they were finishing sentences for me.

The arc of Mick’s time here will be repeated at his next club. He is a brilliant football man who will panel-beat a team into shape, get them organised and win the crowd. Once the cold winds of adversity start to blow again, I fear that a fatal combination of a desire to control everything on and off the pitch coupled with the growing exclusion of anyone perceived to be against him is a toxic blend that will always doom him to failure.




Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.

KiwiBlue2 added 22:56 - Apr 3
The 'dead man walking' image is one that would not sit well with MM's ego. In fairness I think that Klug and/or Nash should have been put in as caretaker(s) until the ongoing replacement can take up the reins.
I think that MM's two main strengths were his ability to get some very good players in (Lawrence, Williams, Fraser, Celina, Waghorn, Garner and several others) albeit mostly on loans, and to survive within the budget he was given and in fact make some money on transfers out (Mings, Cresswell, Murphy). That said there were a few brought in who did not work out (Douglas, Best, etc).
I think his ego got in the way in his 'relationship' with a section of the fans. I suspect that he began to see them as 'ungrateful' for his efforts to keep us in the division given the funding available. When the new manager starts I hope that the 5 point plan is dusted off and updated and turned into a living document to chart a sustainable way forward. I look forward to Andre, Teddy, Tristam, Morris and Folami being given a good chance to consolidate positions in the matchday 18 at least. Saying goodbye to Chambo and Skusey together with an insistence by the manager in a much more positive approach could see us doing well next season. Bringing in a good cb to replace Chambo and CVV (who I expect to return to Spurs) and promoting Woolfenden would be a good start.

2

KiwiBlue2 added 23:03 - Apr 3
Meant to also thank Harry for another good and interesting blog. Lets see what the managerial appointment and new season brings........
2

Warkys_Tash added 23:28 - Apr 3
Spot on Harry, couldn't have put it better myself. Shame as I liked McCarthy when he came in, he gave us our club back and with it the feel good factor. But he was unable to progress his style of play to be entertaining, he did not have the bravery,,as the guy who writes for the Guardian said..he seemed to revert to type after the thrashing at Reading, the season after our play-off season.

However, lets give him credit for saving us from certain relegation when he came in & giving us our first shot at the play-offs in 11 years and since. However, he has reminded us all many times about those two feats..whilst calling most of us out.. Shame.

I am excited for the close seasons and to see who the new manager is. Lets hope Evans doesn't soon turn that to horror and dread.

In a perfect world he would also sell-up asap.
2

awayfan added 14:29 - Apr 4
Excellent blog Harry, thank you.

I agree with Kropotkin123's comments, especially the final paragraph.
1

braveblue added 14:39 - Apr 4
Good read. Thanks
1

gunnerblue added 17:17 - Apr 4
Great read and a different and deeper perspective.

McCarthy went from saviour, (following Keane's debacle), to one of the most disliked managers ever, (anywhere). Your blog has given a really good explanation to this.

His persistence with dull, boring football is his legacy, while his ultimate downfall was to fall out with the supporters so publicly.... football managers suicide.
2

bugledog123 added 17:16 - Apr 5
Great read Harry
1

Marcus added 04:46 - Apr 8
When we appointed Mick I said that I felt he was a necessary evil. Necessary because he was the one chance of avoiding relegation and 'evil' because his style was a mismatch for the club. While he's manager I will keep to my rule of supporting him but right now I really question the logic of keeping him on until the end the season. It creates a toxic environment with the fans, he has be potential to tap up players for his next club and increases the insecurity for the players. Some of them need to realise that with a caretaker boss things can still work for them and a new boss can help them find different potentials. Sure new boss, new signings, some players let go, some insist on leaving, a change in atmosphere in the stands, change in environment on the training pitch. However we need to stop stagnation and look forward. It's time for Mick to walk.
1

LWNR2013 added 19:13 - Apr 8
This was so good Harry I believe that this crystallisers what most of all of us feel both the deluded and the angry. It definitely does it for me.
1

Palestine added 22:52 - Apr 8
Ironically he probably was the right manager after we previously chose the wrong manager Paul Jewell) - McCarthy was one of the few managers that could possibly have kept us up given the terrible position we were in but from that point forward nothing good has really happened apart from Murphy-inspired play-offs. If we hadn’t chosen managers badly in the past we wouldn’t need to have chosen McCarthy.
1

andygri added 13:05 - Apr 10
This is spot on. The incident after the Hull game was McCarthy saying to the players "play for me, not for them". My concern is that the new manager will inherit a set of players that have been conditioned to McCarthy's ways, and who blame the fans for his departure.
1
You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs by HarryfromBath

Blogs 295 bloggers

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024