By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Douglas has been getting a lot of criticism for a while, some justified and I thought some heading into scapegoat territory where he was being blamed for the teams poor performances. I was bored today and decided to look at results when Douglas has started the game and when he hasn't.
With Douglas: P-18 W-3 D-6 L-9 Points - 15 Points per game - 0.83
Without Douglas P-11 W-6 D-2 L-3 Points - 20 Points per game - 1.82
This includes cup games so using 'points' might not quite make sense but there's a clear difference there. I don't want to be totally one-sided so it could be argued that Douglas has played more in games that we've lined up defensively in... make of it what you will.
You were bored so you decided to inflict your boredom on everyone.
We all know we are inferior with him in the side.
Nothing wrong with validating a players poor performances using statistics - not inflicting boredom merely showing people that we are in fact worse with Douglas in the team.
Nothing wrong with validating a players poor performances using statistics - not inflicting boredom merely showing people that we are in fact worse with Douglas in the team.
I was surprised by how big the difference was as well, literally the difference between playoffs and relegation if extended to a whole season, which I suppose explains our mid-table position.