Which if anything, means.... on 12:05 - Jul 24 with 1826 views | ElderGrizzly |
Which if anything, means.... on 11:23 - Jul 24 by Bloots | ....there isn't a #9 on his way imminently. Just saying. |
Exactly. I don't expect anything but a 4th 'option' to be arriving as a striker, not a £3m marquee signing. | | | |
Squad numbers are out... on 12:34 - Jul 24 with 1795 views | Vic |
Squad numbers are out... on 11:11 - Jul 24 by hoppy | The waiting and expectation for that marquee signing, I would imagine will get even more intents as we draw closer to the start of the season... |
As long as he's on the pitch at the start of the season we'll be ok. | |
| |
Squad numbers are out... on 13:16 - Jul 24 with 1764 views | itfcjoe |
Squad numbers are out... on 11:02 - Jul 24 by LankHenners | Going by the article, Garner may well have been the number 9 and chose differently. Wouldn't hang my hat on a big marquee no. 9 signing, although it would be a surprise if there wasn't 1 more striker coming in at some point. |
The guy we nearly signed from Wolves would have been a fairly 'marquee' signing, even if it was only on loan he is a £3m player. Also, there is no way you could say to Garner, signed a s a frontline striker - "Sorry, you can't have the 9 shirt as we are trying to sign someone". New signings just get offered a choice of available numbers. In short - this announcmenet and anything associated makes no change to our need for, and desire to bring in, a good striker | |
| |
Squad numbers are out... on 14:00 - Jul 24 with 1731 views | LankHenners |
Squad numbers are out... on 13:16 - Jul 24 by itfcjoe | The guy we nearly signed from Wolves would have been a fairly 'marquee' signing, even if it was only on loan he is a £3m player. Also, there is no way you could say to Garner, signed a s a frontline striker - "Sorry, you can't have the 9 shirt as we are trying to sign someone". New signings just get offered a choice of available numbers. In short - this announcmenet and anything associated makes no change to our need for, and desire to bring in, a good striker |
I know. I've not said one thing contrary to what you've put. | |
| |
Squad numbers are out... on 15:01 - Jul 24 with 1699 views | wkj | No number for Ben Morris is unfortunate, Looks like he might not have caught Micks eye in pre season - I don't get too wound up about squad numbers, but having no #9 is just not right- wether it was garner's choice or not *shakes fist* let us hope this is fixed sooner rather than later as it's not very nice on the old OCD front. | |
| |
Squad numbers are out... on 17:05 - Jul 24 with 1667 views | BLUEBEAT | Nobody else think our own player, Rowe, should have been given No.11 rather than loanee Celina? And Spence given No.2 over Iorfa? | |
| |
Squad numbers are out... on 17:44 - Jul 24 with 1650 views | itfcjoe |
Squad numbers are out... on 17:05 - Jul 24 by BLUEBEAT | Nobody else think our own player, Rowe, should have been given No.11 rather than loanee Celina? And Spence given No.2 over Iorfa? |
Spence may have just wanted to keep his number | |
| |
Squad numbers are out... on 18:34 - Jul 24 with 1620 views | Trequartista |
Squad numbers are out... on 10:54 - Jul 24 by Steve_M | After Saturday's performance..... No number nine either. |
Number retired as no-one fit to wear Pablo's shirt | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Squad numbers are out... on 20:48 - Jul 24 with 1583 views | strikalite | Maybe it's just me being all optimistic(for once)but to offer a striker that number 9 shirt at the start of a new season for a new Club could be a nice little lure, these players like to feel they're top boy and all that, it can make a difference... | | | |
| |