| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... 15:20 - Aug 12 with 5207 views | NSL |
Knudsen, chambers, skuse and Sears are real real poor. Could be a long game.... |  |
| |  |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 15:24 - Aug 12 with 4747 views | powinswitch |
I am no fan of Mick, but from the available players, who would you gave in place of Knudsen, Chambers and Skuse today then.
Given the number of injuries, his hands are fairly tied at the moment. He is giving youth a chance, rather than the likes of Coke or Douglas. So fair play to Mick. I really would rather see us try and play better football and the early part of this season, I think the manager is trying to do that | | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 15:41 - Aug 12 with 4592 views | Sarge |
Knudsen, Chambers and Skuse were all very good against Birmingham. | | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:02 - Aug 12 with 4458 views | NSL |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 15:24 - Aug 12 by powinswitch |
I am no fan of Mick, but from the available players, who would you gave in place of Knudsen, Chambers and Skuse today then.
Given the number of injuries, his hands are fairly tied at the moment. He is giving youth a chance, rather than the likes of Coke or Douglas. So fair play to Mick. I really would rather see us try and play better football and the early part of this season, I think the manager is trying to do that |
If your playing 5 at the back you can't play skuse as well it's as simple as that. 19 shots to 0, against Barnsley. A bloke he spent a million on and another that scored 2 only 4 days ago sitting on the bench.What a farce.... | |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:14 - Aug 12 with 4378 views | ElderGrizzly |
Well Knudsen just got another assist.... |  | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:23 - Aug 12 with 4346 views | Terry_Nutkins |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:02 - Aug 12 by NSL |
If your playing 5 at the back you can't play skuse as well it's as simple as that. 19 shots to 0, against Barnsley. A bloke he spent a million on and another that scored 2 only 4 days ago sitting on the bench.What a farce.... |
That's just a complete lack of understanding of the system on your part the not Mick's problem. It's not a flat back 5 its wing backs that can actually be a more attacking system and requires a holding midfielder if you want to get your wingbacks forward. [Post edited 12 Aug 2017 16:33]
| |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 17:07 - Aug 12 with 4250 views | Sarge |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:02 - Aug 12 by NSL |
If your playing 5 at the back you can't play skuse as well it's as simple as that. 19 shots to 0, against Barnsley. A bloke he spent a million on and another that scored 2 only 4 days ago sitting on the bench.What a farce.... |
Well don't you look silly | | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 17:10 - Aug 12 with 4224 views | flimflam |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:02 - Aug 12 by NSL |
If your playing 5 at the back you can't play skuse as well it's as simple as that. 19 shots to 0, against Barnsley. A bloke he spent a million on and another that scored 2 only 4 days ago sitting on the bench.What a farce.... |
Didz is still gaining fitness so right to use him in stages right now and who did we pay a million for sitting on the bench? Wags cost 300k!!
Oh and playing 3 at the back away from home with a sitting midfielder is perfectly acceptable by me, just not at home.
You made yourself look a bit of a div. |  |
| All men and women are created, by the, you know the, you know the thing. |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 17:24 - Aug 12 with 4154 views | 3_5_2 |
Wrong again |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 18:35 - Aug 12 with 3997 views | Swailsey |
Lol. |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 19:20 - Aug 12 with 3925 views | TractorCam |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:02 - Aug 12 by NSL |
If your playing 5 at the back you can't play skuse as well it's as simple as that. 19 shots to 0, against Barnsley. A bloke he spent a million on and another that scored 2 only 4 days ago sitting on the bench.What a farce.... |
What are your thoughts now? |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 20:52 - Aug 12 with 3814 views | MaySixth |
lol |  |
| |
| bump on 20:55 - Aug 12 with 3804 views | Dyland |
gmpf |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 21:07 - Aug 12 with 3770 views | AlexGreen |
One poor half from the team overall and you immediately jump on the backs of the traditional scapegoats. I love the fact that in the second half Knudsen set up another glorious goal, Sears worked his socks off and delivered the goods once again, Chambers was a rock and Skuse our best midfielder (again). I'm surprised you didn't add Nydam to your list of people to slate, have you written him off too? |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 21:13 - Aug 12 with 3742 views | Dyland |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 21:07 - Aug 12 by AlexGreen |
One poor half from the team overall and you immediately jump on the backs of the traditional scapegoats. I love the fact that in the second half Knudsen set up another glorious goal, Sears worked his socks off and delivered the goods once again, Chambers was a rock and Skuse our best midfielder (again). I'm surprised you didn't add Nydam to your list of people to slate, have you written him off too? |
It's a classic Greeners. Posting after we concede a goal that he knew we were shoite and he's proved roight.
Categorically proved wrong and no sign of him.
Arf. | |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 21:53 - Aug 12 with 3660 views | 3_5_2 |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 21:13 - Aug 12 by Dyland |
It's a classic Greeners. Posting after we concede a goal that he knew we were shoite and he's proved roight.
Categorically proved wrong and no sign of him.
Arf. |
Arf indeed
Sure to be back when we do lose a game | |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 00:11 - Aug 13 with 3541 views | Tendring_Blue |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:02 - Aug 12 by NSL |
If your playing 5 at the back you can't play skuse as well it's as simple as that. 19 shots to 0, against Barnsley. A bloke he spent a million on and another that scored 2 only 4 days ago sitting on the bench.What a farce.... |
FAKE FAKE NEWS, from the failing Nsl, Fact!
You can get me back when I'm wrong and I usually am!😉 |  | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 00:19 - Aug 13 with 3521 views | jeera |
Pointless crap. |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 00:35 - Aug 13 with 3488 views | CaptMickMills |
Skuse played well today as did Chambers. Sears worked hard and Knudsen defended well on the whole. | | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 06:29 - Aug 13 with 3342 views | Kieran_Knows |
You was saying? |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 09:21 - Aug 13 with 3245 views | dalianwasexciting |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 06:29 - Aug 13 by Kieran_Knows |
You was saying? |
The lack of available first choices did impact badly in the first half, 4 full backs in the team (albeit with ability and flexibility to move). Skuse and Chambers were both excellent, Knudsen was awful first half but improved hugely when he went to Left Back. Kenlock looked out of touch, out of confidence and a weak link to be honest, and the game passed young Nydam by. As for Sears - maybe it should be accepted he is now a wide player where his pace can be a great asset - he does again seem not to be a goalscorer - but I am more than happy to be proved wrong on that count. I expect to see Waghorn start on Tuesday, and assuming he is as fit as he looks, Didz too. |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 13:07 - Aug 13 with 3123 views | TractorCam |
#FreeNSL | |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 13:38 - Aug 13 with 3095 views | braveblue |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 16:23 - Aug 12 by Terry_Nutkins |
That's just a complete lack of understanding of the system on your part the not Mick's problem. It's not a flat back 5 its wing backs that can actually be a more attacking system and requires a holding midfielder if you want to get your wingbacks forward. [Post edited 12 Aug 2017 16:33]
|
Wing backs? They are extra defenders in a back 6. | | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 13:41 - Aug 13 with 3090 views | Herbivore |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 13:38 - Aug 13 by braveblue |
Wing backs? They are extra defenders in a back 6. |
This b0llocks again? |  |
| |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 14:06 - Aug 13 with 3061 views | PJH |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 13:38 - Aug 13 by braveblue |
Wing backs? They are extra defenders in a back 6. |
In that case you should tell Iorfa what his job is because he spent more of the first half in their half than in ours. |  | | |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 14:08 - Aug 13 with 3051 views | Bluebell |
| I did think that the lineup looked exceptionally shocking...... on 13:38 - Aug 13 by braveblue |
Wing backs? They are extra defenders in a back 6. |
Were you at the game? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
