| Celina could have won the game for us last night. 08:45 - Nov 23 with 2173 views | Pinewoodblue |
The amount of space he seems to drift into in the attacking third was amazing. Sadly last night his team mates were not on the same wave length. Wag horn & Sears both had shots, from wide angles, with Celina totally unmarked in the area.
Think that, more than anything, cost us the two points. |  |
| |  |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 08:50 - Nov 23 with 2147 views | Kieran_Knows |
I think leaving a 6ft 8 striker all alone in the 6 yard box with seconds to spare might have played a part too.
But I do get what you're saying, we had chances to kill the game off. Hey ho. |  |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 09:02 - Nov 23 with 2114 views | dirtyboy |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 08:50 - Nov 23 by Kieran_Knows |
I think leaving a 6ft 8 striker all alone in the 6 yard box with seconds to spare might have played a part too.
But I do get what you're saying, we had chances to kill the game off. Hey ho. |
He wasn't all alone at all? Webster was marking him.
Blaming Webster for getting beaten in the air by a 6'8" striker is also ludicrous (I actually thought he fouled Webster).
The issue was letting the cross in, but try enough and one will eventually get through.
Just one of those things.
Look at Garner's goal....that was shocking defending! |  | | |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 09:05 - Nov 23 with 2102 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 09:02 - Nov 23 by dirtyboy |
He wasn't all alone at all? Webster was marking him.
Blaming Webster for getting beaten in the air by a 6'8" striker is also ludicrous (I actually thought he fouled Webster).
The issue was letting the cross in, but try enough and one will eventually get through.
Just one of those things.
Look at Garner's goal....that was shocking defending! |
I wasn't having a pop, was just pointing out that not only missing chances costs us last night.
Ward certainly let his man beat him to easily for the cross (think it was Ward). Hey ho, one of them things (annoyingly). | |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 09:10 - Nov 23 with 2083 views | sparks |
He wants the ball to feet, I would suggest. Not clipped over his head to rat around and work scraps from. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:07 - Nov 23 with 1998 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 09:10 - Nov 23 by sparks |
He wants the ball to feet, I would suggest. Not clipped over his head to rat around and work scraps from. |
Twice he was unmarked, around the penalty spot, but Waghorn & Sears failed to see the opportunity. There were also no defenders between him and the player with the ball that could intercept. They seemed unaware of his availability.
Defenders, at this level, will always make mistakes so it is important to take your chances.
2-2 seemed the likely outcome as soon as we started sitting back. | |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:11 - Nov 23 with 1983 views | Herbivore |
Celina didn't have a very good game overall, not bad but nothing special. It was the right call to take him off. |  |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:37 - Nov 23 with 1949 views | BackToRussia |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:11 - Nov 23 by Herbivore |
Celina didn't have a very good game overall, not bad but nothing special. It was the right call to take him off. |
Doesn't alter the fact he got himself open twice and his teammates simply needed to roll the ball to him for a certain goal. Sears in particular had the blinkers firmly on. |  |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:43 - Nov 23 with 1935 views | Johnny_Boy |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:37 - Nov 23 by BackToRussia |
Doesn't alter the fact he got himself open twice and his teammates simply needed to roll the ball to him for a certain goal. Sears in particular had the blinkers firmly on. |
The difference between the players playing as a team (passing to a team mate in a better position) or playing for themselves (opting for the half effort of a shot themselves).
Thought Celina should have stayed on the pitch. MM, (and his supporters) clearly disagree. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 11:12 - Nov 23 with 1895 views | Herbivore |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:37 - Nov 23 by BackToRussia |
Doesn't alter the fact he got himself open twice and his teammates simply needed to roll the ball to him for a certain goal. Sears in particular had the blinkers firmly on. |
He also did get found once and headed it straight at the keeper. He wasn't poor but he didn't have a great game, didn't look likely to produce a game changing moment. Agree though that Sears and Waghorn should have played him in instead of going for goal. | |
| |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 11:38 - Nov 23 with 1871 views | longtimefan |
| Celina could have won the game for us last night. on 10:43 - Nov 23 by Johnny_Boy |
The difference between the players playing as a team (passing to a team mate in a better position) or playing for themselves (opting for the half effort of a shot themselves).
Thought Celina should have stayed on the pitch. MM, (and his supporters) clearly disagree. |
Celina is capable of turning a game in an instant but he really didn’t contribute much when he got on the ball last night, other than taking the corner for the 2nd goal. Huws looked better and more involved when he came on. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
