| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on 09:34 - Dec 31 with 2431 views | textbackup |
Anyone know who he was? |  |
| |  |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 09:49 - Dec 31 with 2391 views | Herbivore |
By far the worst game I've seen from him. Maybe he's signed a pre-contract with Derby? |  |
| |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 09:51 - Dec 31 with 2383 views | textbackup |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 09:49 - Dec 31 by Herbivore |
By far the worst game I've seen from him. Maybe he's signed a pre-contract with Derby? |
You wouldn’t be too far from the truth with what I heard yesterday. | |
| |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 09:54 - Dec 31 with 2362 views | braveblue |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 09:49 - Dec 31 by Herbivore |
By far the worst game I've seen from him. Maybe he's signed a pre-contract with Derby? |
Maybe he is not a central midfielder? |  | | |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:05 - Dec 31 with 2173 views | textbackup |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 09:54 - Dec 31 by braveblue |
Maybe he is not a central midfielder? |
But still a footballer so should be able to pass? | |
| |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:09 - Dec 31 with 2154 views | Herbivore |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:05 - Dec 31 by textbackup |
But still a footballer so should be able to pass? |
Lots of people keep suggesting that Didz could drop back and be more of a playmaker, not on yesterday's evidence. His passing was shocking. | |
| |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:44 - Dec 31 with 2088 views | textbackup |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:09 - Dec 31 by Herbivore |
Lots of people keep suggesting that Didz could drop back and be more of a playmaker, not on yesterday's evidence. His passing was shocking. |
I’ve certainly suggested it in the past, and reckon he possibly could, but yesterday he was completely out of sorts | |
| |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:46 - Dec 31 with 2082 views | Herbivore |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:44 - Dec 31 by textbackup |
I’ve certainly suggested it in the past, and reckon he possibly could, but yesterday he was completely out of sorts |
It was bizarre. He was misplacing simple passes under little pressure, gave the ball away dangerously a few times. Never seen him that off colour before. | |
| |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:54 - Dec 31 with 2062 views | textbackup |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:46 - Dec 31 by Herbivore |
It was bizarre. He was misplacing simple passes under little pressure, gave the ball away dangerously a few times. Never seen him that off colour before. |
He was just so sluggish, ball stuck under his feet and closed down quickly, he normally seems to have more time than anyone else on the pitch. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 14:07 - Dec 31 with 2045 views | longtimefan |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:54 - Dec 31 by textbackup |
He was just so sluggish, ball stuck under his feet and closed down quickly, he normally seems to have more time than anyone else on the pitch. |
At the time I thought he might be the spark that got us a point. Unfortunately he was worse than Bru who, while he was very poor in the first half, I thought picked his game up considerably in the second and was actually contributing. | | | |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 16:08 - Dec 31 with 1920 views | Herbivore |
| Our number 10 yesterday, sub that came on on 13:46 - Dec 31 by Herbivore |
It was bizarre. He was misplacing simple passes under little pressure, gave the ball away dangerously a few times. Never seen him that off colour before. |
MothersAgainstKids, do you disagree that Didz was poor yesterday? What were your thoughts on the game? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
