| Palace back in for Bart... 17:47 - Jan 31 with 7147 views | SitfcB |
Did he sign that deal? 🙄 [Post edited 31 Jan 2018 17:47]
|  |
| |  |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:51 - Jan 31 with 5042 views | jimsymBLUE |
With a new deal & being last minute his asking fee should have at least doubled in the final few hours of the window. Not that I believe it for a second mind. |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:52 - Jan 31 with 5020 views | 12th_Man |
Won't happen don't believe everything you read on twitter |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:55 - Jan 31 with 4982 views | SomethingBlue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:52 - Jan 31 by 12th_Man |
Won't happen don't believe everything you read on twitter |
At this stage it's a long shot still — but Nixon doesn't get a lot wrong so it's clearly possible. |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:55 - Jan 31 with 4970 views | SitfcB |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:52 - Jan 31 by 12th_Man |
Won't happen don't believe everything you read on twitter |
Coming from you hahahaha ha ha ha | |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:00 - Jan 31 with 4903 views | The_Romford_Blue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:52 - Jan 31 by 12th_Man |
Won't happen don't believe everything you read on twitter |
The fooking irony |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:00 - Jan 31 with 4891 views | christiand |
Perhaps that was the plan all along? | |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:04 - Jan 31 with 4811 views | jas0999 |
MM said was going to sign deal ... | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:05 - Jan 31 with 4799 views | Archer4721 |
My source at the club told me last week the deal had been agreed and was to be signed Feb 1st |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:07 - Jan 31 with 4771 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:05 - Jan 31 by Archer4721 |
My source at the club told me last week the deal had been agreed and was to be signed Feb 1st |
Agreed, not signed then? Oh dear....
|  | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:08 - Jan 31 with 4735 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:07 - Jan 31 by ElderGrizzly |
Agreed, not signed then? Oh dear....
|
Doesn't mean anything. If he wanted to go to Palace he would be new deal signed or not. | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:09 - Jan 31 with 4716 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:08 - Jan 31 by tractorboy1978 |
Doesn't mean anything. If he wanted to go to Palace he would be new deal signed or not. |
I understand that, but most assumed he had signed it and would move in the summer, not 2days later | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:10 - Jan 31 with 4681 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:09 - Jan 31 by ElderGrizzly |
I understand that, but most assumed he had signed it and would move in the summer, not 2days later |
And makes a massive difference to the fee |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:13 - Jan 31 with 4640 views | Archer4721 |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:08 - Jan 31 by tractorboy1978 |
Doesn't mean anything. If he wanted to go to Palace he would be new deal signed or not. |
Indeed. The contract deal was only announced after it seemed Palace's interest had seemingly cooled. The club even at this late stage wouldn't stand in his way if Palace or any other Prem club makes a firm offer. | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:15 - Jan 31 with 4601 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:10 - Jan 31 by FrimleyBlue |
And makes a massive difference to the fee |
We'd be after a bonkers fee at this late stage, deal signed or not signed. Like I said, Bart is obviously not smashing the door down to leave. | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:21 - Jan 31 with 4526 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:10 - Jan 31 by FrimleyBlue |
And makes a massive difference to the fee |
We asked £5m last summer. I’d assume it is the same now.
If Archer is correct, as it stands he hasn’t signed a new contract, so he still has just 18 months left, so no uplift at all. | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:30 - Jan 31 with 4441 views | PhilTWTD |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:09 - Jan 31 by ElderGrizzly |
I understand that, but most assumed he had signed it and would move in the summer, not 2days later |
I'd be very surprised if this is anything more than speculation, as a source at Town has just texted me to confirm as I type.
And if it wasn't would be amazed that Town would allow Bart to move on at this stage given his agreement to sign his new deal, the lateness in the day and lack of time to sign a replacement.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:36 - Jan 31 with 4364 views | Archer4721 |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:30 - Jan 31 by PhilTWTD |
I'd be very surprised if this is anything more than speculation, as a source at Town has just texted me to confirm as I type.
And if it wasn't would be amazed that Town would allow Bart to move on at this stage given his agreement to sign his new deal, the lateness in the day and lack of time to sign a replacement.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Bart doesn't seem to think we need a replacement.
Is Crowe fit now though?
 Bialkowski: Crowe's Ready for First-Team Bow 26th Dec 2017 06:00Blues first-choice keeper Bartosz Bialkowski believes Michael Crowe is ready to make his debut between the sticks for Town if required. Crowe, 22, has been on the bench for the last few games with Dean Gerken out of action due to a hip problem.  13
| | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:38 - Jan 31 with 4350 views | PhilTWTD |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:36 - Jan 31 by Archer4721 |
Bart doesn't seem to think we need a replacement.
Is Crowe fit now though?
Bialkowski: Crowe's Ready for First-Team Bow 26th Dec 2017 06:00Blues first-choice keeper Bartosz Bialkowski believes Michael Crowe is ready to make his debut between the sticks for Town if required. Crowe, 22, has been on the bench for the last few games with Dean Gerken out of action due to a hip problem. 13
|
We'd need another keeper as Gerken's hip's still not 100 per cent. Crowe's fit. | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:39 - Jan 31 with 4309 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:30 - Jan 31 by PhilTWTD |
I'd be very surprised if this is anything more than speculation, as a source at Town has just texted me to confirm as I type.
And if it wasn't would be amazed that Town would allow Bart to move on at this stage given his agreement to sign his new deal, the lateness in the day and lack of time to sign a replacement.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
How late in the day was Murphy? | |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:44 - Jan 31 with 4261 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 17:55 - Jan 31 by SomethingBlue |
At this stage it's a long shot still — but Nixon doesn't get a lot wrong so it's clearly possible. |
Except the spelling of the player's name - unless Palace are in for another player from us other than Bart but with a very similar surname. |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:44 - Jan 31 with 4249 views | pointofblue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:39 - Jan 31 by FrimleyBlue |
How late in the day was Murphy? |
Not this late was he? Plus he was pushing to go - Bart doesn’t seem to be. | |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:47 - Jan 31 with 4217 views | PhilTWTD |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:44 - Jan 31 by pointofblue |
Not this late was he? Plus he was pushing to go - Bart doesn’t seem to be. |
Saturday and the window closed on the Wednesday, off the top of my head. Even if there was anything in the report, which I'm led to believe there isn't (as things stand at least), I'd be surprised if Town would be interested in discussing the matter at this late stage. | | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:47 - Jan 31 with 4209 views | J2BLUE |
It would make no sense whatsoever to sell him now. He'll be 31 in July so he'll have 4 decent years left in him if he went in the summer. We'd also get to keep him for the rest of the season and there's a real chance the new tv deals being auctioned this month will inflate the bubble further. If we were offered £5m today we could probably get £6m in the summer.
Can't see us selling. If we do I could see us signing an average free agent keeper and giving Gerken the shirt. |  |
| |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:50 - Jan 31 with 4170 views | Northern_Blue81 |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:47 - Jan 31 by J2BLUE |
It would make no sense whatsoever to sell him now. He'll be 31 in July so he'll have 4 decent years left in him if he went in the summer. We'd also get to keep him for the rest of the season and there's a real chance the new tv deals being auctioned this month will inflate the bubble further. If we were offered £5m today we could probably get £6m in the summer.
Can't see us selling. If we do I could see us signing an average free agent keeper and giving Gerken the shirt. |
If they offered 4m last week and now they are clutching at straws / desperate for a GK and BB has signed a new deal, they would have to offer 8 - 10m to get a deal going at this stage.
For once the ball is firmly in our court. |  | | |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:52 - Jan 31 with 4147 views | pointofblue |
| Palace back in for Bart... on 18:50 - Jan 31 by Northern_Blue81 |
If they offered 4m last week and now they are clutching at straws / desperate for a GK and BB has signed a new deal, they would have to offer 8 - 10m to get a deal going at this stage.
For once the ball is firmly in our court. |
Let’s be honest we should accept if they offer us £10m - but we have no time to spend it. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
