| Oh Jeremy..... 18:36 - Mar 23 with 160397 views | ElderGrizzly |
Maybe he heard Facebook can end careers....
(Click on Twitter Link to see Corbyn’s comments) [Post edited 23 Mar 2018 18:42]
|  | | |  |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:49 - Mar 24 with 5873 views | imsureazzure |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 19:33 - Mar 23 by Darth_Koont |
Have you seen his other stuff?
By your rationale, in this updated version with a different style, he thinks the USA and the founding fathers are a Jewish conspiracy. Old white men (especially in cartoons) have distinctive noses, no racial stereotyping needed or intended.
Also his new "Jews" at the table look a mixed bag. I think the one on the right may well be Jewish but it would be discriminatory not to include one.
 |
Of course it is racist, they are all white for a start. |  | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:55 - Mar 24 with 5859 views | Darth_Koont |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:49 - Mar 24 by imsureazzure |
Of course it is racist, they are all white for a start. |
And that's inaccurate because? |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:57 - Mar 24 with 5851 views | imsureazzure |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:55 - Mar 24 by Darth_Koont |
And that's inaccurate because? |
It is only the white man that has built their wealth off the backs of the human race? | | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:59 - Mar 24 with 5839 views | Darth_Koont |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:57 - Mar 24 by imsureazzure |
It is only the white man that has built their wealth off the backs of the human race? |
This is clearly depicting the USA. In which case, yes. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:03 - Mar 24 with 5823 views | imsureazzure |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:59 - Mar 24 by Darth_Koont |
This is clearly depicting the USA. In which case, yes. |
Is it? I'm not fully awake yet then. | | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:53 - Mar 24 with 5781 views | Vic |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 18:57 - Mar 23 by J2BLUE |
The people playing the game are Jews. It's a whole 'Jewish conspiracy' thing where they run the world (illuminati). They are playing it on the backs of ordinary people. I did my dissertation on Der Stürmer. It wouldn't look out of place in there.
Can't defend it. |
I find these paintings and what they depict really interesting. I confess to being a total philistine to these th8ngs and a picture is a picture to me. My daughter did a history of art at uni and it fascinated me how she could interpret a picture. What I need to know on this on is how we know the people playing the game are Jews? What are the clues? |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:53 - Mar 24 with 5781 views | imsureazzure |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 08:59 - Mar 24 by Darth_Koont |
This is clearly depicting the USA. In which case, yes. |
Oh I see now, US citizens such as Schiff, Goldman,, Sachs, Zuckerberg, Siegel, etc etc etc. | | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:04 - Mar 24 with 5759 views | Darth_Koont |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:53 - Mar 24 by imsureazzure |
Oh I see now, US citizens such as Schiff, Goldman,, Sachs, Zuckerberg, Siegel, etc etc etc. |
Eh? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Oh Jeremy..... on 13:09 - Mar 24 with 5666 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 19:18 - Mar 23 by BackToRussia |
I think we can definitely say it was a very bad idea of Corbyn to defend it. But then again, he could well have not been aware.
You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this. I mean, I do, anyway. |
You’re a good bloke BTR but you are in serious danger of turning into somebody is an apologist for a man who is an apologist for anti Semitism. You can’t keep falling back onto the same default line every time Jezza or the Labour party are involved in yet another instance of anti Semitism.
You do it every time this issue is raised.
The question has to be asked; do you seriously not see that since Jezza became Labour leader the party has been gripped by numerous cases of anti Semitism. Or is the fact that you believe Jezza will deliver youa socialist utopia enough for you to look the other way?
If the mural story was an isolated incident then you could be generous and say he was bloody stupid. But it’s yet another example of a patter and that pattern has lead to anti Semitism becoming prevalent in the Labour party since Corbyn was elected leader in 2015.
Since Corbyn became Labour leader thousands of Labour members have been investigated or suspended over allegations of antisemitism. This was unheard of in the Labour party before Jezza became leader.
The day before the mural story broke another story got a brief mention. Corbyn had been outed as being a member of another anti semitic facebook page. Just two weeks after he was outed as being a member of a secret group for two years that had numerous posts of anti semitic abuse and holocaust denials. Jezza’s excuse. I didn’t see any anti semitic posts.
To be caught in one anti semitic facebook group may be careless; two looks like something a little more sinister.
You mention that Corbyn launched an inquiry into anti Semitism and believe, therefore, that he can hardly be accused of encouraging it. He was pressured into launching it after burying his head in the sand for weeks after this sort of stuff was doing the rounds on social media by labour members:
“Hitler was a Zionist God, If it wasn’t for my man Hitler the Jews would have wiped out Palestine years ago, posting a cartoon bemoaning the emphasis schools place on teaching the Holocaust with the heading "and the six million Zionists that were killed.", posting cartoons of hooked nose Jews with blood dripping from their mouths in the style of Nazi 1930’s propaganda. labelling anyone who is Jewish as a “ZIO”, What do you know about Jews? They have big noses and they support Spurs. Using words like "solution" and "transportation" in relation to Jewish people”
So Jezza brought in Shami Chakrabarti to conduct a whitewash and just a few weeks later gave her a seat in the House of Lords and a place in the Labour shadow cabinet.
Just think about that for a minute.
Imagine endless displays of racism from members of the Tory party on social media had been surfacing for months and Theresa May did nothing about it, before eventualy bowing to pressure from her black and Asian members to conduct an inquiry. Imagine then that Mrs May appointed a right wing Judge to conduct an inquiry who then delivered a whitewash. Just a few weeks later she then appoints this judge to the House of Lords and makes him Attorney General. You would be one of the first in here to shout out Tory corruption. And I would be joining you in doing so.
So please Corbynistas. No more using the Chakrabarti report as a defence of Jezza and anti smitism.
Moving on from the Chakrabarti report the House of Commons all party select committee on home affairs branded elements of Corbyn’s labour party as being institutionally anti-Semitic.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/136/136.pdf
The report then went on to say that Corbyn showed a "lack of consistent leadership on this issue, and his reluctance to separate antisemitism from other forms of racism, has created what some have referred to as a ‘safe space’ for those with vile attitudes towards Jewish people. This situation has been further exacerbated by the Party’s demonstrable incompetence at dealing with members accused of antisemitism".
It also says "Jewish Labour MPs have been subject to appalling levels of abuse, including antisemitic death threats from individuals purporting to be supporters of Mr Corbyn."
Since the HOC report was published another report by the Campaign against Anti Semitism found that officials (people elected to various positions and committees in the Labour party) from the Labour party were 8 times more likely to be anti semitic than officials from any other political party. The report also said that Labour voters are no more likely to be anti semitic than voters of other parties and that it showed how the Labour party has fallen out of step with its core supporters, who are generally less likely to hold anti-Semitic beliefs.
Add to this is the fact that Labour have readmitted holocaust deniers back into their ranks after they were suspended when the leadership of the party was more moderate. What sort of signal does that send out?
Why do these vile racists feel comfortable in a Corbyn lead Labour party? It’s the leader. Corbyn. He has cosied up to some of the most vile anti semites and holocaust deniers you could imagine.
Lets see what Jezza had to say about Raed Salah’, an Islamist who has been accused of spreading the Blood Libel (an old antisemitic conspiracy that Jews use the blood of gentile children to make their bread). This nasty piece of work is a straight-up Jew hater.
Corbyn said in 2012, ‘Salah is far from a dangerous man’, even though Salah was first charged with inciting anti-Jewish racism and violence in January 2008. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said ‘Salah is a very honoured citizen’, even though, as I said a couple of paragraphs up, that Salah was found guilty of spreading the blood libel. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said: ‘Salah represents his people extremely well’, even though after 9/11 Salah wrote “ 4,000 Jews who work every day at the Twin Towers were warned to be absent from their work on September 11, 2001”. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said ‘Salah’s is a voice that must be heard’ even though he has called homosexuality a ‘great crime’. Nice.
Corbyn said ‘I look forward to giving you tea on the terrace because you deserve it!’ Do you honestly believe that someone with those homophobic and anti-Semitic views is worthy of tea on the terrace?
Corbyn’s reply when challenged on what he had said about Salah? “He never said anything anti-Semitic in front of me”
Moving on. Corbyn wrote in defence of a vicar who suggested that 9/11 was an inside job by the Jews.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3191393/Jeremy-Corbyn-defended-controver
Another example, just in case you aren’t convinced that Corbyn is complicit in the rise of anti semtism in the Labour party. Corbyn was also a long-time backer of an anti-Israel group founded by Paul Eisen, attending its events long after Eisen had outed himself as a Holocaust denier. Eisen claims Corbyn donated money to him. Corbyn says he may have given him money but can’t remember.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/20/jeremy-corbyns-10-year-association-g
The group run by Eisen, was suspended by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign over its anti-Semitism. Corbyn continued his support for Eisen’s DYR for a further six years. Corbyn attended a meeting organised by Eisen just two years before becoming Labour leader and seven years after Eisen had outed himself as a holocaust denier. Jezza’s most recent comment on Eisen? He hadn’t made him aware he was a holocaust denier. Even though he publicly louted himself as such and his group had been expelled by the mainstream Palestinian movement.
So he’s defended an anti semitic mural because he didn’t look closely enough at it to see the anti Semitism, he’s a member for two years of a secret anti semitic facebook group but he never saw any anti semitic posts, he praises an anti semitic hate preacher but never heard him say anything anti semitic and he attends and speaks at events organised by a holocaust denier but wasn’t aware he was a holocaust denier.
Can you honestly keep defending this sort of stuff? I’d say that anyone who does so needs to have a serious look at themselves and their views. Is a bit of Jew hate just a small price to pay for Comrade Corbyn ushering in a socialist utopia?
Even more worrying is that rather taking the allegations with any seriousness your first thought is “You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this. I mean, I do, anyway.”
Imagine had somebody found a facebook post revealing Thresa May had defended a racist mural in East London in 2012, had attended several meetings organised by Tommy Robinson, had praised the leaders of the Klu Klux Klan as “voices that deserved to be heard” and had been outed ass a member of a secret racist facebook group. Would your first thought have been ““You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this”? |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 15:27 - Mar 24 with 5607 views | No9 |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 13:09 - Mar 24 by GlasgowBlue |
You’re a good bloke BTR but you are in serious danger of turning into somebody is an apologist for a man who is an apologist for anti Semitism. You can’t keep falling back onto the same default line every time Jezza or the Labour party are involved in yet another instance of anti Semitism.
You do it every time this issue is raised.
The question has to be asked; do you seriously not see that since Jezza became Labour leader the party has been gripped by numerous cases of anti Semitism. Or is the fact that you believe Jezza will deliver youa socialist utopia enough for you to look the other way?
If the mural story was an isolated incident then you could be generous and say he was bloody stupid. But it’s yet another example of a patter and that pattern has lead to anti Semitism becoming prevalent in the Labour party since Corbyn was elected leader in 2015.
Since Corbyn became Labour leader thousands of Labour members have been investigated or suspended over allegations of antisemitism. This was unheard of in the Labour party before Jezza became leader.
The day before the mural story broke another story got a brief mention. Corbyn had been outed as being a member of another anti semitic facebook page. Just two weeks after he was outed as being a member of a secret group for two years that had numerous posts of anti semitic abuse and holocaust denials. Jezza’s excuse. I didn’t see any anti semitic posts.
To be caught in one anti semitic facebook group may be careless; two looks like something a little more sinister.
You mention that Corbyn launched an inquiry into anti Semitism and believe, therefore, that he can hardly be accused of encouraging it. He was pressured into launching it after burying his head in the sand for weeks after this sort of stuff was doing the rounds on social media by labour members:
“Hitler was a Zionist God, If it wasn’t for my man Hitler the Jews would have wiped out Palestine years ago, posting a cartoon bemoaning the emphasis schools place on teaching the Holocaust with the heading "and the six million Zionists that were killed.", posting cartoons of hooked nose Jews with blood dripping from their mouths in the style of Nazi 1930’s propaganda. labelling anyone who is Jewish as a “ZIO”, What do you know about Jews? They have big noses and they support Spurs. Using words like "solution" and "transportation" in relation to Jewish people”
So Jezza brought in Shami Chakrabarti to conduct a whitewash and just a few weeks later gave her a seat in the House of Lords and a place in the Labour shadow cabinet.
Just think about that for a minute.
Imagine endless displays of racism from members of the Tory party on social media had been surfacing for months and Theresa May did nothing about it, before eventualy bowing to pressure from her black and Asian members to conduct an inquiry. Imagine then that Mrs May appointed a right wing Judge to conduct an inquiry who then delivered a whitewash. Just a few weeks later she then appoints this judge to the House of Lords and makes him Attorney General. You would be one of the first in here to shout out Tory corruption. And I would be joining you in doing so.
So please Corbynistas. No more using the Chakrabarti report as a defence of Jezza and anti smitism.
Moving on from the Chakrabarti report the House of Commons all party select committee on home affairs branded elements of Corbyn’s labour party as being institutionally anti-Semitic.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/136/136.pdf
The report then went on to say that Corbyn showed a "lack of consistent leadership on this issue, and his reluctance to separate antisemitism from other forms of racism, has created what some have referred to as a ‘safe space’ for those with vile attitudes towards Jewish people. This situation has been further exacerbated by the Party’s demonstrable incompetence at dealing with members accused of antisemitism".
It also says "Jewish Labour MPs have been subject to appalling levels of abuse, including antisemitic death threats from individuals purporting to be supporters of Mr Corbyn."
Since the HOC report was published another report by the Campaign against Anti Semitism found that officials (people elected to various positions and committees in the Labour party) from the Labour party were 8 times more likely to be anti semitic than officials from any other political party. The report also said that Labour voters are no more likely to be anti semitic than voters of other parties and that it showed how the Labour party has fallen out of step with its core supporters, who are generally less likely to hold anti-Semitic beliefs.
Add to this is the fact that Labour have readmitted holocaust deniers back into their ranks after they were suspended when the leadership of the party was more moderate. What sort of signal does that send out?
Why do these vile racists feel comfortable in a Corbyn lead Labour party? It’s the leader. Corbyn. He has cosied up to some of the most vile anti semites and holocaust deniers you could imagine.
Lets see what Jezza had to say about Raed Salah’, an Islamist who has been accused of spreading the Blood Libel (an old antisemitic conspiracy that Jews use the blood of gentile children to make their bread). This nasty piece of work is a straight-up Jew hater.
Corbyn said in 2012, ‘Salah is far from a dangerous man’, even though Salah was first charged with inciting anti-Jewish racism and violence in January 2008. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said ‘Salah is a very honoured citizen’, even though, as I said a couple of paragraphs up, that Salah was found guilty of spreading the blood libel. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said: ‘Salah represents his people extremely well’, even though after 9/11 Salah wrote “ 4,000 Jews who work every day at the Twin Towers were warned to be absent from their work on September 11, 2001”. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said ‘Salah’s is a voice that must be heard’ even though he has called homosexuality a ‘great crime’. Nice.
Corbyn said ‘I look forward to giving you tea on the terrace because you deserve it!’ Do you honestly believe that someone with those homophobic and anti-Semitic views is worthy of tea on the terrace?
Corbyn’s reply when challenged on what he had said about Salah? “He never said anything anti-Semitic in front of me”
Moving on. Corbyn wrote in defence of a vicar who suggested that 9/11 was an inside job by the Jews.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3191393/Jeremy-Corbyn-defended-controver
Another example, just in case you aren’t convinced that Corbyn is complicit in the rise of anti semtism in the Labour party. Corbyn was also a long-time backer of an anti-Israel group founded by Paul Eisen, attending its events long after Eisen had outed himself as a Holocaust denier. Eisen claims Corbyn donated money to him. Corbyn says he may have given him money but can’t remember.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/20/jeremy-corbyns-10-year-association-g
The group run by Eisen, was suspended by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign over its anti-Semitism. Corbyn continued his support for Eisen’s DYR for a further six years. Corbyn attended a meeting organised by Eisen just two years before becoming Labour leader and seven years after Eisen had outed himself as a holocaust denier. Jezza’s most recent comment on Eisen? He hadn’t made him aware he was a holocaust denier. Even though he publicly louted himself as such and his group had been expelled by the mainstream Palestinian movement.
So he’s defended an anti semitic mural because he didn’t look closely enough at it to see the anti Semitism, he’s a member for two years of a secret anti semitic facebook group but he never saw any anti semitic posts, he praises an anti semitic hate preacher but never heard him say anything anti semitic and he attends and speaks at events organised by a holocaust denier but wasn’t aware he was a holocaust denier.
Can you honestly keep defending this sort of stuff? I’d say that anyone who does so needs to have a serious look at themselves and their views. Is a bit of Jew hate just a small price to pay for Comrade Corbyn ushering in a socialist utopia?
Even more worrying is that rather taking the allegations with any seriousness your first thought is “You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this. I mean, I do, anyway.”
Imagine had somebody found a facebook post revealing Thresa May had defended a racist mural in East London in 2012, had attended several meetings organised by Tommy Robinson, had praised the leaders of the Klu Klux Klan as “voices that deserved to be heard” and had been outed ass a member of a secret racist facebook group. Would your first thought have been ““You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this”? |
Would, or do you defend the alleged racist comments by the tories against the mayor of London? |  | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 23:18 - Mar 24 with 5557 views | BackToRussia |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 13:09 - Mar 24 by GlasgowBlue |
You’re a good bloke BTR but you are in serious danger of turning into somebody is an apologist for a man who is an apologist for anti Semitism. You can’t keep falling back onto the same default line every time Jezza or the Labour party are involved in yet another instance of anti Semitism.
You do it every time this issue is raised.
The question has to be asked; do you seriously not see that since Jezza became Labour leader the party has been gripped by numerous cases of anti Semitism. Or is the fact that you believe Jezza will deliver youa socialist utopia enough for you to look the other way?
If the mural story was an isolated incident then you could be generous and say he was bloody stupid. But it’s yet another example of a patter and that pattern has lead to anti Semitism becoming prevalent in the Labour party since Corbyn was elected leader in 2015.
Since Corbyn became Labour leader thousands of Labour members have been investigated or suspended over allegations of antisemitism. This was unheard of in the Labour party before Jezza became leader.
The day before the mural story broke another story got a brief mention. Corbyn had been outed as being a member of another anti semitic facebook page. Just two weeks after he was outed as being a member of a secret group for two years that had numerous posts of anti semitic abuse and holocaust denials. Jezza’s excuse. I didn’t see any anti semitic posts.
To be caught in one anti semitic facebook group may be careless; two looks like something a little more sinister.
You mention that Corbyn launched an inquiry into anti Semitism and believe, therefore, that he can hardly be accused of encouraging it. He was pressured into launching it after burying his head in the sand for weeks after this sort of stuff was doing the rounds on social media by labour members:
“Hitler was a Zionist God, If it wasn’t for my man Hitler the Jews would have wiped out Palestine years ago, posting a cartoon bemoaning the emphasis schools place on teaching the Holocaust with the heading "and the six million Zionists that were killed.", posting cartoons of hooked nose Jews with blood dripping from their mouths in the style of Nazi 1930’s propaganda. labelling anyone who is Jewish as a “ZIO”, What do you know about Jews? They have big noses and they support Spurs. Using words like "solution" and "transportation" in relation to Jewish people”
So Jezza brought in Shami Chakrabarti to conduct a whitewash and just a few weeks later gave her a seat in the House of Lords and a place in the Labour shadow cabinet.
Just think about that for a minute.
Imagine endless displays of racism from members of the Tory party on social media had been surfacing for months and Theresa May did nothing about it, before eventualy bowing to pressure from her black and Asian members to conduct an inquiry. Imagine then that Mrs May appointed a right wing Judge to conduct an inquiry who then delivered a whitewash. Just a few weeks later she then appoints this judge to the House of Lords and makes him Attorney General. You would be one of the first in here to shout out Tory corruption. And I would be joining you in doing so.
So please Corbynistas. No more using the Chakrabarti report as a defence of Jezza and anti smitism.
Moving on from the Chakrabarti report the House of Commons all party select committee on home affairs branded elements of Corbyn’s labour party as being institutionally anti-Semitic.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/136/136.pdf
The report then went on to say that Corbyn showed a "lack of consistent leadership on this issue, and his reluctance to separate antisemitism from other forms of racism, has created what some have referred to as a ‘safe space’ for those with vile attitudes towards Jewish people. This situation has been further exacerbated by the Party’s demonstrable incompetence at dealing with members accused of antisemitism".
It also says "Jewish Labour MPs have been subject to appalling levels of abuse, including antisemitic death threats from individuals purporting to be supporters of Mr Corbyn."
Since the HOC report was published another report by the Campaign against Anti Semitism found that officials (people elected to various positions and committees in the Labour party) from the Labour party were 8 times more likely to be anti semitic than officials from any other political party. The report also said that Labour voters are no more likely to be anti semitic than voters of other parties and that it showed how the Labour party has fallen out of step with its core supporters, who are generally less likely to hold anti-Semitic beliefs.
Add to this is the fact that Labour have readmitted holocaust deniers back into their ranks after they were suspended when the leadership of the party was more moderate. What sort of signal does that send out?
Why do these vile racists feel comfortable in a Corbyn lead Labour party? It’s the leader. Corbyn. He has cosied up to some of the most vile anti semites and holocaust deniers you could imagine.
Lets see what Jezza had to say about Raed Salah’, an Islamist who has been accused of spreading the Blood Libel (an old antisemitic conspiracy that Jews use the blood of gentile children to make their bread). This nasty piece of work is a straight-up Jew hater.
Corbyn said in 2012, ‘Salah is far from a dangerous man’, even though Salah was first charged with inciting anti-Jewish racism and violence in January 2008. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said ‘Salah is a very honoured citizen’, even though, as I said a couple of paragraphs up, that Salah was found guilty of spreading the blood libel. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said: ‘Salah represents his people extremely well’, even though after 9/11 Salah wrote “ 4,000 Jews who work every day at the Twin Towers were warned to be absent from their work on September 11, 2001”. Do you think that sends out a signal to the anti-Semites that the Labour party is a home for them?
Corbyn said ‘Salah’s is a voice that must be heard’ even though he has called homosexuality a ‘great crime’. Nice.
Corbyn said ‘I look forward to giving you tea on the terrace because you deserve it!’ Do you honestly believe that someone with those homophobic and anti-Semitic views is worthy of tea on the terrace?
Corbyn’s reply when challenged on what he had said about Salah? “He never said anything anti-Semitic in front of me”
Moving on. Corbyn wrote in defence of a vicar who suggested that 9/11 was an inside job by the Jews.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3191393/Jeremy-Corbyn-defended-controver
Another example, just in case you aren’t convinced that Corbyn is complicit in the rise of anti semtism in the Labour party. Corbyn was also a long-time backer of an anti-Israel group founded by Paul Eisen, attending its events long after Eisen had outed himself as a Holocaust denier. Eisen claims Corbyn donated money to him. Corbyn says he may have given him money but can’t remember.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/20/jeremy-corbyns-10-year-association-g
The group run by Eisen, was suspended by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign over its anti-Semitism. Corbyn continued his support for Eisen’s DYR for a further six years. Corbyn attended a meeting organised by Eisen just two years before becoming Labour leader and seven years after Eisen had outed himself as a holocaust denier. Jezza’s most recent comment on Eisen? He hadn’t made him aware he was a holocaust denier. Even though he publicly louted himself as such and his group had been expelled by the mainstream Palestinian movement.
So he’s defended an anti semitic mural because he didn’t look closely enough at it to see the anti Semitism, he’s a member for two years of a secret anti semitic facebook group but he never saw any anti semitic posts, he praises an anti semitic hate preacher but never heard him say anything anti semitic and he attends and speaks at events organised by a holocaust denier but wasn’t aware he was a holocaust denier.
Can you honestly keep defending this sort of stuff? I’d say that anyone who does so needs to have a serious look at themselves and their views. Is a bit of Jew hate just a small price to pay for Comrade Corbyn ushering in a socialist utopia?
Even more worrying is that rather taking the allegations with any seriousness your first thought is “You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this. I mean, I do, anyway.”
Imagine had somebody found a facebook post revealing Thresa May had defended a racist mural in East London in 2012, had attended several meetings organised by Tommy Robinson, had praised the leaders of the Klu Klux Klan as “voices that deserved to be heard” and had been outed ass a member of a secret racist facebook group. Would your first thought have been ““You have to question why people are trawling through Facebook to find stuff like this”? |
Obviously I will not be addressing every point in this. But my basic position is that this has clearly come from the right wing, and I do not trust you lot to bring any valid criticism to the table. A smear campaign was obviously started as soon as Corbyn was elected because he was seen as dangerous to the establishment. You lot are now the boys who cried wolf, and it's too bad too sad if you've picked the only valid criticism of Corbyn at the end of your campaign. The radical left can fall prey to hate speech because of their political hatred of Israel which is clearly ridiculous. I imagine Corbyn has by necessity had to operate in circles where elements like that operate, similarly to how right-wing parties have the taint of racism about them, like how the Tories have to associate with UKIPers. And I think Corbyn is naive in the extreme. You clearly see this as a cynical racist operating, as per your Jewish Chronicle link. I truly believe that from Corbyn's other actions it would be honestly absurd to think he was an antisemite. [Post edited 24 Mar 2018 23:35]
|  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:10 - Mar 25 with 5497 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 23:18 - Mar 24 by BackToRussia |
Obviously I will not be addressing every point in this. But my basic position is that this has clearly come from the right wing, and I do not trust you lot to bring any valid criticism to the table. A smear campaign was obviously started as soon as Corbyn was elected because he was seen as dangerous to the establishment. You lot are now the boys who cried wolf, and it's too bad too sad if you've picked the only valid criticism of Corbyn at the end of your campaign. The radical left can fall prey to hate speech because of their political hatred of Israel which is clearly ridiculous. I imagine Corbyn has by necessity had to operate in circles where elements like that operate, similarly to how right-wing parties have the taint of racism about them, like how the Tories have to associate with UKIPers. And I think Corbyn is naive in the extreme. You clearly see this as a cynical racist operating, as per your Jewish Chronicle link. I truly believe that from Corbyn's other actions it would be honestly absurd to think he was an antisemite. [Post edited 24 Mar 2018 23:35]
|
“Obviously I will not be addressing every point in this”
Every Point? You haven’t event bothered to address, debate or challenge a single point. Instead you excuse blatant racism and dismiss it as a right wing smear. Despite the accusations and concerns coming from a great number of Labour MP’s and members. Some of whom are Jewish and some who are not. You are turning a a blind eye to racism. Frankly, you should be ashamed
First they came for the Jews....... [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 9:11]
| |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:22 - Mar 25 with 5490 views | BackToRussia |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:10 - Mar 25 by GlasgowBlue |
“Obviously I will not be addressing every point in this”
Every Point? You haven’t event bothered to address, debate or challenge a single point. Instead you excuse blatant racism and dismiss it as a right wing smear. Despite the accusations and concerns coming from a great number of Labour MP’s and members. Some of whom are Jewish and some who are not. You are turning a a blind eye to racism. Frankly, you should be ashamed
First they came for the Jews....... [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 9:11]
|
So we've finally reached the Corbyn is a Nazi stage. Was waiting for that! | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:49 - Mar 25 with 5472 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:22 - Mar 25 by BackToRussia |
So we've finally reached the Corbyn is a Nazi stage. Was waiting for that! |
No Corbyn isn’t a Nazi. He isn’t an anti semite. Far worse than that. He has turn a blind eye to anti semitism over the decades because he found allies in holocaust deniers and anti semites in his pet causes. He has allowed this cancer to spread in a party that before he became leader, had a record of equality and inclusiveness that was streets ahead of any other party in this country. And in two years he has destroyed that reputation.
I gave you a list of examples where he has done this and you couldn’t even muster a single rebuttal. You just don’t care. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:54 - Mar 25 with 5468 views | BackToRussia |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:49 - Mar 25 by GlasgowBlue |
No Corbyn isn’t a Nazi. He isn’t an anti semite. Far worse than that. He has turn a blind eye to anti semitism over the decades because he found allies in holocaust deniers and anti semites in his pet causes. He has allowed this cancer to spread in a party that before he became leader, had a record of equality and inclusiveness that was streets ahead of any other party in this country. And in two years he has destroyed that reputation.
I gave you a list of examples where he has done this and you couldn’t even muster a single rebuttal. You just don’t care. |
Where things have been brought to his attention he has explained himself. You have essentially trawled through his life to find instances where he has had perhaps overly close or suspicious associations in large groups which include individual racists for instance and said "That doesn't look good." He has never politically been actually active with holocaust deniers. That would mean working with them, sharing their views and supporting them publicly. You want guilt by association. Corbyn could probably do more to expel members who are found guilty of racism quicker or more severely, but a lot of is mindless rank and file on Twitter. I am sure MPs got abused before Corbyn was leader. I am sure they realised the political capital they could make out of it after the fact too. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:58 - Mar 25 with 5460 views | lowhouseblue |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:49 - Mar 25 by GlasgowBlue |
No Corbyn isn’t a Nazi. He isn’t an anti semite. Far worse than that. He has turn a blind eye to anti semitism over the decades because he found allies in holocaust deniers and anti semites in his pet causes. He has allowed this cancer to spread in a party that before he became leader, had a record of equality and inclusiveness that was streets ahead of any other party in this country. And in two years he has destroyed that reputation.
I gave you a list of examples where he has done this and you couldn’t even muster a single rebuttal. You just don’t care. |
once someone assumes: "a smear campaign was obviously started as soon as corbyn was elected because he was seen as dangerous to the establishment" it gives them free rein to ignore everything that's inconvenient. any analysis of his past is a smear. any analysis of the people and groups he has been close to for the past 30 years is a smear. everything inconvenient is a smear.
sadly some of us knew he existed before 2015. [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 10:14]
|  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:02 - Mar 25 with 5455 views | BackToRussia |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:58 - Mar 25 by lowhouseblue |
once someone assumes: "a smear campaign was obviously started as soon as corbyn was elected because he was seen as dangerous to the establishment" it gives them free rein to ignore everything that's inconvenient. any analysis of his past is a smear. any analysis of the people and groups he has been close to for the past 30 years is a smear. everything inconvenient is a smear.
sadly some of us knew he existed before 2015. [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 10:14]
|
Well if you want to be taken seriously, you probably should have not been political children for the last three years. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:12 - Mar 25 with 5446 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:02 - Mar 25 by BackToRussia |
Well if you want to be taken seriously, you probably should have not been political children for the last three years. |
Do you realise how foolish you are making yourself look.
Cirbyn has aciutaetd himself with terrorists, holocaust deniers and anti semites over the last thirty years. His leadership has coincided with the Labour Party being gripped by almost daily revelations of anti semitism. But because of how you perceive some posters behaviour on a football internet message board you are going to turn a blind eye to it all.
Seriously? | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:33 - Mar 25 with 5427 views | No9 |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 09:58 - Mar 25 by lowhouseblue |
once someone assumes: "a smear campaign was obviously started as soon as corbyn was elected because he was seen as dangerous to the establishment" it gives them free rein to ignore everything that's inconvenient. any analysis of his past is a smear. any analysis of the people and groups he has been close to for the past 30 years is a smear. everything inconvenient is a smear.
sadly some of us knew he existed before 2015. [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 10:14]
|
& yet much of the media & the politico's have become so obsessed with Mr Corbyn much of the real news (as opposed to what happened several years ago) is being ignored.
With the other things going on it is obvious Mr Coryn is the diversion rather than the story. It is these other things you shopuld be looking at | | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:38 - Mar 25 with 5427 views | BackToRussia |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:12 - Mar 25 by GlasgowBlue |
Do you realise how foolish you are making yourself look.
Cirbyn has aciutaetd himself with terrorists, holocaust deniers and anti semites over the last thirty years. His leadership has coincided with the Labour Party being gripped by almost daily revelations of anti semitism. But because of how you perceive some posters behaviour on a football internet message board you are going to turn a blind eye to it all.
Seriously? |
Not concerned by appearances. I have read and thought about the antisemitism and I do not believe Corbyn is an antisemite. He could perhaps more to distance himself from racist elements within the left-wing scene, but I also don't think it is his historical responsibility to apologise for every dubious association. Again, has he espoused racist views? Has he publicly supported racist views? Has he ever done anything in parliament that is racist? No. Has he condemned and acted upon things that have been brought to his attention? Yes, in every case, although some times too slowly.
And yes, I don't trust what you or lowhouse say, honestly, when it comes to Corbyn. [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 10:39]
| |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:46 - Mar 25 with 5416 views | No9 |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:38 - Mar 25 by BackToRussia |
Not concerned by appearances. I have read and thought about the antisemitism and I do not believe Corbyn is an antisemite. He could perhaps more to distance himself from racist elements within the left-wing scene, but I also don't think it is his historical responsibility to apologise for every dubious association. Again, has he espoused racist views? Has he publicly supported racist views? Has he ever done anything in parliament that is racist? No. Has he condemned and acted upon things that have been brought to his attention? Yes, in every case, although some times too slowly.
And yes, I don't trust what you or lowhouse say, honestly, when it comes to Corbyn. [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 10:39]
|
Isn't it blatantly obvious that Glasgow is peddling someone else material?
Maybe he is even paid, I suggest you take this for waht it is = RW propaganda | | | |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:52 - Mar 25 with 5408 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:38 - Mar 25 by BackToRussia |
Not concerned by appearances. I have read and thought about the antisemitism and I do not believe Corbyn is an antisemite. He could perhaps more to distance himself from racist elements within the left-wing scene, but I also don't think it is his historical responsibility to apologise for every dubious association. Again, has he espoused racist views? Has he publicly supported racist views? Has he ever done anything in parliament that is racist? No. Has he condemned and acted upon things that have been brought to his attention? Yes, in every case, although some times too slowly.
And yes, I don't trust what you or lowhouse say, honestly, when it comes to Corbyn. [Post edited 25 Mar 2018 10:39]
|
The most depressing thing about this, Owen Smith etc, etc....is the extent to which it shows that the labour right, in cahoots with a supportive media, (or the lowhouse wing) are, despite everything, still more interested in trying to take back the party rather than oppose the tories! Bunch of careerist, politico, dead beats! |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 11:22 - Mar 25 with 5397 views | lowhouseblue |
| Oh Jeremy..... on 10:33 - Mar 25 by No9 |
& yet much of the media & the politico's have become so obsessed with Mr Corbyn much of the real news (as opposed to what happened several years ago) is being ignored.
With the other things going on it is obvious Mr Coryn is the diversion rather than the story. It is these other things you shopuld be looking at |
the reason this stuff matters is that if you want to hold a government to account you need to start with a credible opposition. no sane person can believe that corbyn, mcdonnell, and abbott are a government in waiting. and if you judge them by the things they have previously said and the people they have associated themselves with, they aren't fit to govern. when people from the centre left are saying that you ought to realise there's an issue. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
