| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 21:53 - May 17 with 1289 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
I think we could all do it cheaper if we didn't do it right......slice and dice, slice and dice! And then it becomes too difficult to put it back together again. |  |
|  |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 22:01 - May 17 with 1282 views | TractorWood |
The NHS negligence bill this year alone will £1.6 billion. People need to leave aside the political bs and admit it's completely unsustainable in a country with an aging population. No progress will be made until people stop weaponising the electorate by emotional blackmail. [Post edited 17 May 2018 22:05]
|  |
| |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 22:12 - May 17 with 1258 views | No9 |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 22:01 - May 17 by TractorWood |
The NHS negligence bill this year alone will £1.6 billion. People need to leave aside the political bs and admit it's completely unsustainable in a country with an aging population. No progress will be made until people stop weaponising the electorate by emotional blackmail. [Post edited 17 May 2018 22:05]
|
What is your proposal ? let people die in the street?
Before you propose private insurance do you know what exclusions means? |  | | |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 22:14 - May 17 with 1257 views | No9 |
The issue here is that the contracts have been badly negotiated to allow these private companies to walk away without any penalty | | | |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 06:38 - May 18 with 1183 views | TractorWood |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 22:12 - May 17 by No9 |
What is your proposal ? let people die in the street?
Before you propose private insurance do you know what exclusions means? |
We either scale it back to a system that still serves the vulnerable and emergencies based on a limited funding model or we fund the living daylights out if it and demand it be fit for purpose. Ie. 30 minutes waiting time in A&E and operations within a month.
The issue at the moment is that it's short of funding needed to be a full service health system with an aging population and people have unrealistic expectations of it. It's one of the biggest employers in the world and already has the budget of a medium sized country's GDP, the problem with funding the daylights out of it, is that it would probably bankrupt the country.
Instead people will continue to not engage with sorting it out and we'll continue to be stuck in a cycle where it's at breaking point, then gets a bit of money, then it gets some cuts, then it's at breaking point. Rinse and repeat. [Post edited 18 May 2018 6:40]
| |
| |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 07:21 - May 18 with 1146 views | BlueBadger |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 22:01 - May 17 by TractorWood |
The NHS negligence bill this year alone will £1.6 billion. People need to leave aside the political bs and admit it's completely unsustainable in a country with an aging population. No progress will be made until people stop weaponising the electorate by emotional blackmail. [Post edited 17 May 2018 22:05]
|
The bill for running the internal market will be, at a conservative estimate, over twice that. That's a lot of money wasted of solicitors, accountants and middle managers that could actually fund direct patient care or education initiatives that would do a lot more in reducing the negligence bill than spending a lot of money asking Crapita to cut corners. |  |
| |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 07:22 - May 18 with 1144 views | BlueBadger |
| The Efficient Private Sector strikes gain part 58695960707 on 06:38 - May 18 by TractorWood |
We either scale it back to a system that still serves the vulnerable and emergencies based on a limited funding model or we fund the living daylights out if it and demand it be fit for purpose. Ie. 30 minutes waiting time in A&E and operations within a month.
The issue at the moment is that it's short of funding needed to be a full service health system with an aging population and people have unrealistic expectations of it. It's one of the biggest employers in the world and already has the budget of a medium sized country's GDP, the problem with funding the daylights out of it, is that it would probably bankrupt the country.
Instead people will continue to not engage with sorting it out and we'll continue to be stuck in a cycle where it's at breaking point, then gets a bit of money, then it gets some cuts, then it's at breaking point. Rinse and repeat. [Post edited 18 May 2018 6:40]
|
The annual funding deficit currently runs to around £4bn a year. Coincidentally, this number is what administering the process of tendering services out to people like Crapita to run them badly costs. And that's BEFORE you factor in costs like sorting it out AFTER people like Crapita have f*cked it up. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
