| Sackings at Ipswich hospital 15:10 - May 19 with 2481 views | No9 |
just heard on the radio that a number of people at Ipswich hospital have been sacked for accessing Ed Sheerans perosnal details without good reason
|  | | |  |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 15:13 - May 19 with 2444 views | Pendejo |
Breach of the Data Protection Act |  |
| |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 15:15 - May 19 with 2430 views | bontcho |
1. Quite right too.
2. Creates some vacancies for Mrs Ross and others. |  |
| |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 15:19 - May 19 with 2427 views | MattinLondon |
Idiots.
Every time you use a NHS smart card your online history is logged and if you view records then you’re open to being challenged. |  | | |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 15:50 - May 19 with 2323 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 15:13 - May 19 by Pendejo |
Breach of the Data Protection Act |
Is it? What provision? Consent is given by patients for hoisitals to access and store their data.
I would imagine it is actually in relation to a branch of the hoisptial’s patient confidentiality policy. | | | |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 16:31 - May 19 with 2253 views | Pendejo |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 15:50 - May 19 by Oxford_Blue |
Is it? What provision? Consent is given by patients for hoisitals to access and store their data.
I would imagine it is actually in relation to a branch of the hoisptial’s patient confidentiality policy. |
A person has to have a legitimate need for the data for it to be accessed.
The patient's [implied] consent is given for a hospital to store certain data pertaining to visits, this data may only be accessed by someone with a legitimate need for the information.
The hospital's confidentiality policy, which would form part of an employment contract adds to that which is provided for in the act and would include such things not provided for under the Data Protection Act i.e. overheard conversations that may not form part of formal medical notes.
Thus a transgression under 2 counts.
1. Accessing the data without specific need > Breach DPA
2. Passing on the information to another party > Breach of PP
Hey, I'm no expert, you may well be more versed in law / Statutes etc and I could be completely wrong and you right... but what's a hoisptial? | |
| |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 17:37 - May 19 with 2136 views | BlueBadger |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 16:31 - May 19 by Pendejo |
A person has to have a legitimate need for the data for it to be accessed.
The patient's [implied] consent is given for a hospital to store certain data pertaining to visits, this data may only be accessed by someone with a legitimate need for the information.
The hospital's confidentiality policy, which would form part of an employment contract adds to that which is provided for in the act and would include such things not provided for under the Data Protection Act i.e. overheard conversations that may not form part of formal medical notes.
Thus a transgression under 2 counts.
1. Accessing the data without specific need > Breach DPA
2. Passing on the information to another party > Breach of PP
Hey, I'm no expert, you may well be more versed in law / Statutes etc and I could be completely wrong and you right... but what's a hoisptial? |
Essentially that^ |  |
| |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 17:38 - May 19 with 2137 views | BlueBadger |
Sounds fair enough to me. That's a gross breach of confidentiality. | |
| |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 17:51 - May 19 with 2110 views | longtimefan |
Actually one sacking of an admin person and one written warning for a member of medical staff. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital (n/t) on 17:57 - May 19 with 2100 views | WD19 |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 16:31 - May 19 by Pendejo |
A person has to have a legitimate need for the data for it to be accessed.
The patient's [implied] consent is given for a hospital to store certain data pertaining to visits, this data may only be accessed by someone with a legitimate need for the information.
The hospital's confidentiality policy, which would form part of an employment contract adds to that which is provided for in the act and would include such things not provided for under the Data Protection Act i.e. overheard conversations that may not form part of formal medical notes.
Thus a transgression under 2 counts.
1. Accessing the data without specific need > Breach DPA
2. Passing on the information to another party > Breach of PP
Hey, I'm no expert, you may well be more versed in law / Statutes etc and I could be completely wrong and you right... but what's a hoisptial? |
[Post edited 19 May 2018 17:57]
|  | | |
| Sackings at Ipswich hospital on 18:15 - May 19 with 2053 views | bluewein |
I was expecting you to blame this on the tories somehow... |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
