Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Second time Sunderland have gazumped us while we dithered if it’s true. (n/t) 12:45 - May 23 with 616 viewsITFC_Forever


P 1118, W 498, D 285, L 335, F 1699, A 1352
Blog: Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

0
Second time Sunderland have gazumped us while we dithered if it’s true. (n/t) on 12:47 - May 23 with 593 viewsIllinoisblue

Ah; Kevin Phillips...... what might have been

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

0
Second time Sunderland have gazumped us while we dithered if it’s true. (n/t) on 12:49 - May 23 with 568 viewsSteve_M

Second time Sunderland have gazumped us while we dithered if it’s true. (n/t) on 12:47 - May 23 by Illinoisblue

Ah; Kevin Phillips...... what might have been


Although that came down to the tribunal rules ultimately. We could only have one transfer subject to one and Tony Vaughan's transfer was already pending (we got a good amount of money for him at least).

Poll: When are the squad numbers out?
Blog: Cycle of Hurt

0
Second time Sunderland have gazumped us while we dithered if it’s true. (n/t) on 12:58 - May 23 with 514 viewsArcher4721

Second time Sunderland have gazumped us while we dithered if it’s true. (n/t) on 12:49 - May 23 by Steve_M

Although that came down to the tribunal rules ultimately. We could only have one transfer subject to one and Tony Vaughan's transfer was already pending (we got a good amount of money for him at least).


Sheepshanks would't pay the extra 25k Watford wanted....The rest is history.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024