Forum | Can we all agree that Ross isnâ€™t the man we thought? by DanFord

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Can we all agree that Ross isnâ€™t the man we thought? 19:06 - May 23 with 1187 views

He’s clearly spoken to Sunderland before permission was granted. He couldn’t have been oblivious to that. Given how St Mirren have acted with class and allowed him to speak with us and Barnsley plus they’ve offered him a new deal as well it’s pretty poor how he’s conducted himself.

Poll:

Would you be willing to consider a new club crest?

-1

Can we all agree that Ross isn’t the man we thought? on 19:09 - May 23 with 1174 views

FrimleyBlue

Not really. Hes on hols. Could easily be his agents fed him aline of contact granted.. these are the terms offered etc.

Also.. if the release clause is true. Permission isnt needed.

	Waka waka eh eh
Poll:	We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog:	Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

Can we all agree that Ross isn’t the man we thought? on 19:12 - May 23 with 1148 views

wkj

whether its him, his agent, or the lizard people, this whole saga has some how managed to trump the boIIocks that was the George Boyd/Taylor double swoop in terms of flouncing, misplaced hope, drama.

It does seem on their forums that the Jack Ross love is starting to turn a bit ugly at St M who seem to just want someone in place and confirmed so they can look forward to next season, kind of like us

[Post edited 23 May 2018 19:16]

	Crybaby
Poll:	Who do you want to have win the playoffs then?
Blog:	The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

Can we all agree that Ross isn’t the man we thought? on 19:13 - May 23 with 1135 views

VeryStableGenius

As he has just won the Scottish equivalent of the Vanarama National, League 1 is probably a better match for him. Next.

Can we all agree that Ross isn’t the man we thought? on 19:58 - May 23 with 1026 views

braveblue

Sour grapes?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread