So, just to recap?... 23:10 - Jun 18 with 1401 views | Marshalls_Mullet | ...was their penalty given without the need for VAR? And the first have penalty appeal for Kane was referred to VAR and not given. Only in Russia eh!! | |
| | |
So, just to recap?... on 23:25 - Jun 18 with 1365 views | StokieBlue | Well, given our recent relationship with Russia it's not that surprising if Putin plays his hand during our matches. <insert conspiracy theory here> SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
So, just to recap?... on 23:58 - Jun 18 with 1304 views | Stewart27 | Wasn’t referred to VAR. That’s the issue. | | | |
So, just to recap?... on 00:07 - Jun 19 with 1298 views | factual_blue | And Stone's header was over the line for the first goal before the keeper palmed it out on to Kane's boot. | |
| |
So, just to recap?... on 05:39 - Jun 19 with 1216 views | leftback |
So, just to recap?... on 00:07 - Jun 19 by factual_blue | And Stone's header was over the line for the first goal before the keeper palmed it out on to Kane's boot. |
Except it wasn’t....... there’s no grey area with this, as buzzer will go on refs wrist if ball crossses line | | | |
So, just to recap?... on 06:28 - Jun 19 with 1180 views | bluelou |
So, just to recap?... on 23:58 - Jun 18 by Stewart27 | Wasn’t referred to VAR. That’s the issue. |
Actually both their penalty and our shout were reviewed by VAR and in both cases the result was that the ref hadn’t missed anything. How the didn’t give the two against Kane, I’ll never know. What I dislike about VAR is that it seems the more your team appeal for it the more likely is you’ll get a referral. | |
| |
So, just to recap?... on 07:15 - Jun 19 with 1143 views | Pendejo | Let's put it in the simplist of terms;- Their penalty; our defender's arm went inadvertently across his opponent who would not have made it to the ball Our "non" penalties; full on WWE body slams employed by defenders | |
| |
| |