| Expenditure 10:12 - Aug 2 with 1531 views | billlm |
Webster sold knight sold,flores sold,FIFA money,possibly Knudsen, huge savings on last season's wages and the possible incomings, I'm probably wrong but it dosent look like ME has spent to much this transfer window, if waghorn leaves ME looks like he will have a tidy profit in the bank, |  | | |  |
| Expenditure on 10:21 - Aug 2 with 1471 views | Reuser_is_God |
This is why I believe the signing of Nolan, Nsiala, Tilt & Jackson could happen without Waghorn going. |  |
| |
| Expenditure on 10:24 - Aug 2 with 1463 views | Darth_Koont |
Profit doesn't exist. Even if we're up on our transfer business we're just covering the continual losses.
But I'm sure the amount of money coming in has given Hurst more leeway. Certainly our transfer fee spending looks like it's increasing, perhaps even doubling or tripling at this rate. |  |
| |
| Expenditure on 10:30 - Aug 2 with 1408 views | Betablocker |
| Expenditure on 10:24 - Aug 2 by Darth_Koont |
Profit doesn't exist. Even if we're up on our transfer business we're just covering the continual losses.
But I'm sure the amount of money coming in has given Hurst more leeway. Certainly our transfer fee spending looks like it's increasing, perhaps even doubling or tripling at this rate. |
With expected wages going in the opposite direction id suggest.
So it fits the cost neutral 'model' Evans runs opposed to other owners in the league trying to over invest to better enable the possibilty of promotion. |  | | |
| Expenditure on 10:33 - Aug 2 with 1389 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Expenditure on 10:24 - Aug 2 by Darth_Koont |
Profit doesn't exist. Even if we're up on our transfer business we're just covering the continual losses.
But I'm sure the amount of money coming in has given Hurst more leeway. Certainly our transfer fee spending looks like it's increasing, perhaps even doubling or tripling at this rate. |
Waiting for the first posts to show of
" if only Mick had money like this to spend" |  |
| |
| Expenditure on 10:40 - Aug 2 with 1348 views | Darth_Koont |
| Expenditure on 10:30 - Aug 2 by Betablocker |
With expected wages going in the opposite direction id suggest.
So it fits the cost neutral 'model' Evans runs opposed to other owners in the league trying to over invest to better enable the possibilty of promotion. |
I think there's an argument to suggest that the sustainable approach is better for clubs and the game irrespective of FFP.
The big money spending seems to have succeeded and failed in equal measure with the difference that the debt is rarely reduced even with promotion and always increased massively with non-promotion let alone relegation.
I agree maybe an extra few million might be the happy medium to boost our chances of getting into contention without jeopardising our future. But I must admit I'd love it if clubs turned around in a few years' time and looked at our model (cost-neutral, academy focus, undervalued signings, patience) and thought this was the new way to go. | |
| |
| Expenditure on 10:43 - Aug 2 with 1326 views | Darth_Koont |
| Expenditure on 10:33 - Aug 2 by FrimleyBlue |
Waiting for the first posts to show of
" if only Mick had money like this to spend" |
Well, we'd have to wait a year or more to see if Hurst is even spending more money overall. It's certainly not meant to be a departure from ME's ongoing approach. | |
| |
| Expenditure on 10:46 - Aug 2 with 1308 views | Jon_456 |
| Expenditure on 10:24 - Aug 2 by Darth_Koont |
Profit doesn't exist. Even if we're up on our transfer business we're just covering the continual losses.
But I'm sure the amount of money coming in has given Hurst more leeway. Certainly our transfer fee spending looks like it's increasing, perhaps even doubling or tripling at this rate. |
Exactly this. This constant BS about ME not investing and taking money out of the club through player sales is becoming very tiring.. | | | |
| Expenditure on 11:50 - Aug 2 with 1201 views | Guthrum |
| Expenditure on 10:33 - Aug 2 by FrimleyBlue |
Waiting for the first posts to show of
" if only Mick had money like this to spend" |
I think to an extent he probably did have. It's not like we've blown enormous sums on individual players.
McCarthy always said there was no point in spending money unless he thought there were players worth it. When you're looking for experienced, but perhaps disregarded, Championship men, it's either freebies or very expensive (and we couldn't do the latter). Hurst is shopping in a market with somewhat higher starting threshold for fees, namely League One and Two prospects. Hence he's spent a little more. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Expenditure on 11:56 - Aug 2 with 1170 views | agentp |
That's an income of about £4.25m (roughly)
We've got Edwards Harrison and Chalobah. for around £2m (so far0 and looking at bringing in 3-4 more players regardless of Waghorn going. There should be an ap on your phone called calculator. | |
| |
| Expenditure on 12:32 - Aug 2 with 1094 views | flimflam |
MM signs a freebie experienced pro on 3yr contract on 13k per week = £2,028,000
PH signs league 1 player on 3yr contract, initial outlay 750k, 8k per week = £1,999,000
Outlay not a lot different just the way we are going about it. |  |
| All men and women are created, by the, you know the, you know the thing. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
