Obviously this could ruffle a few feathers or go unnoticed.
It is a shame however that it is viewed on the finance side, he mentions value and profit and fair share, much more than talent, progression and promotion. And never really touched on entertainment.
I said a couple of years ago on here, I wouldn’t care if we never spent £1m on another player, if it meant our team was a mix of old heads, and young legs. Seeing our academy provide the base of our team should always be the goal.
Sadly some of our better prospects move before they even earn a squad number.
What does that say about those who aren’t pinched by the big clubs? It doesn’t mean they aren’t good enough, but it does mean that in the eyes of the financial team that maybe they aren’t so saleable. |  |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
