15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City 20:54 - Sep 20 with 5399 views | MaySixth | The Times online now and in print tomorrow | |
| | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 20:56 - Sep 20 with 5017 views | Superfrans | “Facing” - that means they may be docked 15 points, but may not. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 20:58 - Sep 20 with 5004 views | patrickswell | They’ll probably have 3 back after September 29.... Would put them 13 points behind us, if true. | | | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:01 - Sep 20 with 4969 views | J2BLUE | These things never seem to actually happen. I'll believe it when I see it. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:01 - Sep 20 with 4972 views | itfcjoe | I don’t care how we stay up this year as long as we do, so this is good for us Arry strikes again | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:03 - Sep 20 with 4946 views | ElderGrizzly | 15 of a maximum of 21pt penalty for breaking FFP rules
Points penalties like this are required to make FFP have any teeth. Forest and Derby next? [Post edited 20 Sep 2018 21:04]
| | | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:06 - Sep 20 with 4914 views | Bent_double |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 20:56 - Sep 20 by Superfrans | “Facing” - that means they may be docked 15 points, but may not. |
Can't see it happening, but would be very happy if it did - not because it helps us, but because it will finally mean that the FL are enforcing FFP and that we were right to stick to it. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:37 - Sep 20 with 4729 views | ITFC_Forever | How can they be punished for a crime committed in the past by a rule / penalty introduced today? | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:49 - Sep 20 with 4654 views | Superfrans |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:37 - Sep 20 by ITFC_Forever | How can they be punished for a crime committed in the past by a rule / penalty introduced today? |
The rules have always existed. The penalty has just been changed. It’s like if you were done for speeding (the offence being last month, but the ticket arriving today) and they upgraded the punishment, you would be subject to the new punishment. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:49 - Sep 20 with 4648 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:37 - Sep 20 by ITFC_Forever | How can they be punished for a crime committed in the past by a rule / penalty introduced today? |
That is also true. The penalty should be that which was in the legislation at the time of the offence. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:01 - Sep 20 with 4558 views | ITFC_Forever |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:49 - Sep 20 by Superfrans | The rules have always existed. The penalty has just been changed. It’s like if you were done for speeding (the offence being last month, but the ticket arriving today) and they upgraded the punishment, you would be subject to the new punishment. |
Surely you can only be subject to the punishment that was in place at the time? | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:12 - Sep 20 with 4492 views | Pinewoodblue |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:03 - Sep 20 by ElderGrizzly | 15 of a maximum of 21pt penalty for breaking FFP rules
Points penalties like this are required to make FFP have any teeth. Forest and Derby next? [Post edited 20 Sep 2018 21:04]
|
Presumably six points for breaking the rules last season, remember it is aggregated over 3 years, wit the other 9 to follow if they do the same this season. They won't be the last. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:13 - Sep 20 with 4478 views | ElderGrizzly |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:12 - Sep 20 by Pinewoodblue | Presumably six points for breaking the rules last season, remember it is aggregated over 3 years, wit the other 9 to follow if they do the same this season. They won't be the last. |
The spending by Forest this season will take them over the limit. They are just gambling on going up so the fine won’t matter | | | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:22 - Sep 20 with 4420 views | factual_blue | Or, after prolonged discussions and threats of litigation, an addition of five points. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:26 - Sep 20 with 4399 views | Vic | It won’t happen. Sadly. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:39 - Sep 20 with 4335 views | blueconscience |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:26 - Sep 20 by Vic | It won’t happen. Sadly. |
Exactly, if they deduct points from one team for overspending, over half the teams in the division should also face a points deduction. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:41 - Sep 20 with 4322 views | Binner | I like OP's title line. Its like the 1970s teleprinter at 5 o'clock on a Saturday when there was a big score... Ipswich 7 (seven) West Bromwich 0 | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 23:01 - Sep 20 with 4229 views | Horseboy |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:13 - Sep 20 by ElderGrizzly | The spending by Forest this season will take them over the limit. They are just gambling on going up so the fine won’t matter |
Are you certain about this accusation? I'm interested, can you provide a breakdown of there accounts against available losses of 39 million over 3 years please? | | | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 23:01 - Sep 20 with 4226 views | ElderGrizzly |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:39 - Sep 20 by blueconscience | Exactly, if they deduct points from one team for overspending, over half the teams in the division should also face a points deduction. |
Only if they break the rules. We are overspending in theory. Our wage bill alone is about £5m more than our income | | | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 23:20 - Sep 20 with 4153 views | Coastalblue | If they start hitting lots of teams hard, then we could end up with a top half finish this season.* *Actually I don't think we'll be that far away anyway as long as we show some patience. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 23:56 - Sep 20 with 4075 views | Guthrum | FFP finally grows teeth. Maybe. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 08:03 - Sep 21 with 3785 views | Currie10 |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 21:01 - Sep 20 by itfcjoe | I don’t care how we stay up this year as long as we do, so this is good for us Arry strikes again |
I love how Redknapp gets the blame for clueless people who don't understand football paying obscene money like it's his fault. It's the clubs fault. | | | |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 08:31 - Sep 21 with 3703 views | itfcjoe |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 08:03 - Sep 21 by Currie10 | I love how Redknapp gets the blame for clueless people who don't understand football paying obscene money like it's his fault. It's the clubs fault. |
He does seem to have a way of getting owners to spend silly money and leaving them in difficult. I agree it is the owners fault though ultimately for doing so - he just seems to leave a path of financial ruin behind him | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 08:32 - Sep 21 with 3698 views | ArnieM | The EFL is toothless. So it won’t happen. | |
| |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 08:43 - Sep 21 with 3664 views | Radlett_blue |
15 (FIFTEEN) point deduction for Birmingham City on 22:41 - Sep 20 by Binner | I like OP's title line. Its like the 1970s teleprinter at 5 o'clock on a Saturday when there was a big score... Ipswich 7 (seven) West Bromwich 0 |
I struggled with the switch from the teleprinter to the vidiprinter, myself. I also miss Button "B". [Post edited 21 Sep 2018 8:44]
| |
| |
| |