By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
So for all the fanfare about Lambert on 19:06 - Dec 15 by Eireannach_gorm
You are demonstrating yourself how ridiculous it is to use statistics based on small sample size to prove anything. Based on one win Lambert is now better than Hurst while previously he was worse.
How do you measure momentum statistically? I do agree with your sentiments though. If the gap gets too big it is bad from a psychological perspective ( also difficult to quantify ).
To say Hurst was better than Lambert was never the point I was making though...
Highlighting crass stupidity since sometime around 2010