| Good news. Chambers at right back. 15:52 - Jan 11 with 5231 views | braveblue |
I really can’t believe I am reading this so often. He was so bad in that position teams used to target him!!!! |  | | |  |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:52 - Jan 11 with 5210 views | JammyDodgerrr |
It really is quite the turn of events. He will be even worse now, especially how with Lambert likes his full backs to play. No chance he will play there. |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:55 - Jan 11 with 5189 views | Herbivore |
He wasn't bad. We were top 6 with him there and with an attacking full back on the other side he was fine and gave us good balance. He's a better CB and also his legs have gone a little bit so I wouldn't want him there now but to say he was awful is pure revisionism. |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:16 - Jan 11 with 5118 views | SWGF |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:55 - Jan 11 by Herbivore |
He wasn't bad. We were top 6 with him there and with an attacking full back on the other side he was fine and gave us good balance. He's a better CB and also his legs have gone a little bit so I wouldn't want him there now but to say he was awful is pure revisionism. |
I believe the reason why we were top six was more to do with the centre forward scoring 27 league goals |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:24 - Jan 11 with 5078 views | LeagueOne |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:16 - Jan 11 by SWGF |
I believe the reason why we were top six was more to do with the centre forward scoring 27 league goals |
Yup, and one of the reasons we weren't top two was the amount of silly goals we gave away, which cost us - that Mings, Berra, Smith, Chambo and Gerken were all guilty of at times. |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:29 - Jan 11 with 5053 views | unstableblue |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:55 - Jan 11 by Herbivore |
He wasn't bad. We were top 6 with him there and with an attacking full back on the other side he was fine and gave us good balance. He's a better CB and also his legs have gone a little bit so I wouldn't want him there now but to say he was awful is pure revisionism. |
Herbivore - he wasn’t a disaster as you say. But as soon as he was up against a tricky and/or fast winger he would get skinned. |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:33 - Jan 11 with 5028 views | Superfrans |
A. who has been saying Chambers will move to full back? I’ve not seen that.
B. He was full back in the defence which helped get us into the play-offs. He can’t have been that bad. [Post edited 11 Jan 2019 16:34]
|  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:37 - Jan 11 with 4987 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:33 - Jan 11 by Superfrans |
A. who has been saying Chambers will move to full back? I’ve not seen that.
B. He was full back in the defence which helped get us into the play-offs. He can’t have been that bad. [Post edited 11 Jan 2019 16:34]
|
A lot of the team for saturday threads feature heavy amounts of Chambers at RB. | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:38 - Jan 11 with 4982 views | BlueBadger |
Look on the bright side, he'll be closer to the side of the pitch so that you'll find it easier to imagine him saying naughty words. [Post edited 11 Jan 2019 16:38]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:39 - Jan 11 with 4973 views | BlueBadger |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:29 - Jan 11 by unstableblue |
Herbivore - he wasn’t a disaster as you say. But as soon as he was up against a tricky and/or fast winger he would get skinned. |
So, pretty much like every other right back we've had since David Wright? | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:41 - Jan 11 with 4953 views | bongoblue91 |
Absolute madness, I’ve been thinking the same thing! Like you said teams targeted him and I would put it down to being the reason we didn’t finish top 2! Mick was slated by fans for constantly playing him there! People forget so quickly! | | | |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:46 - Jan 11 with 4919 views | Superfrans |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:37 - Jan 11 by JammyDodgerrr |
A lot of the team for saturday threads feature heavy amounts of Chambers at RB. |
Daft. Won’t happen.
For a start, Pennington is more of a full-back in recent seasons, if we want to switch one across to take out Spence.
That said, I’d take anyone over Spence atm. | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:47 - Jan 11 with 4910 views | unstableblue |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:39 - Jan 11 by BlueBadger |
So, pretty much like every other right back we've had since David Wright? |
Absolutely 100% correct.
It’s the shame of the club.
No decent right back since Wright.
No truly creative “grab the game by the scruff of the neck” since Magilton. Albeit I do think Garvan have ot a good go... but just came up short.
No town manager of recent years can be deemed a success while these fundamental roles have remained unfulfilled. | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:24 - Jan 11 with 4798 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:46 - Jan 11 by Superfrans |
Daft. Won’t happen.
For a start, Pennington is more of a full-back in recent seasons, if we want to switch one across to take out Spence.
That said, I’d take anyone over Spence atm. |
I think this is the root of the idea that Chambo may be going back to rb. It's an 'anyone but Spence' viewpoint. Which could well be in vain as Lambo has been supportive and played him when he didn't have to. There could be a player in there still, he's got a great pedigree which seems at odds with him being found out so often. A bit of an enigma. |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:29 - Jan 11 with 4768 views | BlueBadger |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:41 - Jan 11 by bongoblue91 |
Absolute madness, I’ve been thinking the same thing! Like you said teams targeted him and I would put it down to being the reason we didn’t finish top 2! Mick was slated by fans for constantly playing him there! People forget so quickly! |
It's alright, like the man swearing at fans, it's only happening in his head. | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:30 - Jan 11 with 4756 views | MrTown |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:55 - Jan 11 by Herbivore |
He wasn't bad. We were top 6 with him there and with an attacking full back on the other side he was fine and gave us good balance. He's a better CB and also his legs have gone a little bit so I wouldn't want him there now but to say he was awful is pure revisionism. |
Have a day off. |  |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:30 - Jan 11 with 4754 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:47 - Jan 11 by unstableblue |
Absolutely 100% correct.
It’s the shame of the club.
No decent right back since Wright.
No truly creative “grab the game by the scruff of the neck” since Magilton. Albeit I do think Garvan have ot a good go... but just came up short.
No town manager of recent years can be deemed a success while these fundamental roles have remained unfulfilled. |
Oh, I don't know. Bowyer could grab people by the scruff of the neck... | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:36 - Jan 11 with 4725 views | BlueBadger |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:37 - Jan 11 by JammyDodgerrr |
A lot of the team for saturday threads feature heavy amounts of Chambers at RB. |
So, essentially, the OP is getting upset about something that is highly unlikey to happen? | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:40 - Jan 11 with 4715 views | BlueBadger |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:55 - Jan 11 by Herbivore |
He wasn't bad. We were top 6 with him there and with an attacking full back on the other side he was fine and gave us good balance. He's a better CB and also his legs have gone a little bit so I wouldn't want him there now but to say he was awful is pure revisionism. |
You're forgetting the most important thing in all of this. HE was one of Mick's key men. | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 18:47 - Jan 11 with 4592 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:30 - Jan 11 by MrTown |
Have a day off. |
He’s on one today. |  | | |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 18:48 - Jan 11 with 4588 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 15:55 - Jan 11 by Herbivore |
He wasn't bad. We were top 6 with him there and with an attacking full back on the other side he was fine and gave us good balance. He's a better CB and also his legs have gone a little bit so I wouldn't want him there now but to say he was awful is pure revisionism. |
Haha! He was awful, skinned constantly. We had a striker smashing goals in, that’s why we were top 6. | | | |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 19:01 - Jan 11 with 4541 views | blueislander |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 17:30 - Jan 11 by Swansea_Blue |
Oh, I don't know. Bowyer could grab people by the scruff of the neck... |
Keane ruined Garvan | | | |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 19:03 - Jan 11 with 4529 views | BlueBadger |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 19:01 - Jan 11 by blueislander |
Keane ruined Garvan |
In a very real sense, Keane is responsible for the mess we find ourselves in now. Had he not wasted his transfer fund so spectacularly, managers following him would probably have had a bit more money to play with in the transfer market. | |
| |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 20:01 - Jan 11 with 4428 views | Ely_Blue |
| Good news. Chambers at right back. on 16:29 - Jan 11 by unstableblue |
Herbivore - he wasn’t a disaster as you say. But as soon as he was up against a tricky and/or fast winger he would get skinned. |
So no different to what we have been playing with all season then! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
