| on 16:57 - Jan 30 with 4893 views | _ |
|  | |  |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:02 - Jan 30 with 4855 views | jjblue84 |
The no deal vote is not legally binding...so we leave, and let the EU enjoy their forthcoming massive recession!! |  | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:04 - Jan 30 with 4867 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:02 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
The no deal vote is not legally binding...so we leave, and let the EU enjoy their forthcoming massive recession!! |
By that logic, the ((edit: withdrawal, not indy)) referendum itself was also not legally binding either, it was advisory [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:19]
|  |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:05 - Jan 30 with 4859 views | strikalite |
Why on earth would we show the EU leaders that we're not interested in a no deal?? Can someone explain...that's like showing the poker table our hand, no? |  | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:07 - Jan 30 with 4838 views | jjblue84 |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:04 - Jan 30 by wkj |
By that logic, the ((edit: withdrawal, not indy)) referendum itself was also not legally binding either, it was advisory [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:19]
|
You’ve managed to cram about 3 errors into one sentence, I have to admire that reply!! | | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:07 - Jan 30 with 4854 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:05 - Jan 30 by strikalite |
Why on earth would we show the EU leaders that we're not interested in a no deal?? Can someone explain...that's like showing the poker table our hand, no? |
I think it comes down to, a pro remain government showing the EU they don't want to leave, but also don't want to pointedly betray the voters. | |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:09 - Jan 30 with 4837 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:07 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
You’ve managed to cram about 3 errors into one sentence, I have to admire that reply!! |
Incorrect - Parliament is sovereign, the voters are not - Parliament are not legally obligated to honour the referendum results pure and simple, it just wouldn't be very wise for to ignore the vote. [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:10]
| |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:13 - Jan 30 with 4817 views | baxterbasics |
You've exposed the futility of legislating against a 'no deal' scenario. To avoid it you need to have an actual viable deal on the table. No-deal is the default position until Parliament can agree on something that the EU will also accept. Even if the only way out is an A50 extension, this still requires every member state to agree.
Clock is ticking. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:14 - Jan 30 with 4793 views | jjblue84 |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:09 - Jan 30 by wkj |
Incorrect - Parliament is sovereign, the voters are not - Parliament are not legally obligated to honour the referendum results pure and simple, it just wouldn't be very wise for to ignore the vote. [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:10]
|
They passed it into law! So we’re leaving March 29 unless the law is changed! | | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:16 - Jan 30 with 4786 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:14 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
They passed it into law! So we’re leaving March 29 unless the law is changed! |
Which you have highlighted the golden issue there yourself : unless the law is changed. Moving the goalposts is something this parliament likes to do quite often on both sides after all. | |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:18 - Jan 30 with 4773 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:07 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
You’ve managed to cram about 3 errors into one sentence, I have to admire that reply!! |
Wrong. |  |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:20 - Jan 30 with 4753 views | The_Last_Baron |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:04 - Jan 30 by wkj |
By that logic, the ((edit: withdrawal, not indy)) referendum itself was also not legally binding either, it was advisory [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:19]
|
You misunderstand.
The referendum act was put through Parliament, it became law.
This amendment you're talking about is meaningless.
The two amendments last night which could have led to statute were the Cooper amendment and the Grieve amendment. Both were thankfully defeated relatively comfortably. Roll on 29th March. |  |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:23 - Jan 30 with 4730 views | Pinewoodblue |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:09 - Jan 30 by wkj |
Incorrect - Parliament is sovereign, the voters are not - Parliament are not legally obligated to honour the referendum results pure and simple, it just wouldn't be very wise for to ignore the vote. [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:10]
|
Some motions put to Parliament are binding but others are not. The no deal amendment was not binding. The government have been defeated on a number of motions in recent months, all of a non binding nature. Conservative policy, when they know they wouldn't win such a vote has been to abstain. |  |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:26 - Jan 30 with 4725 views | Basuco |
It should be down to the UK public to vote on the brexit deal as it stands or stay in the EU, at least this time we will know for sure what we are voting on, unlike the lies and deceit from both sides before the last vote. |  | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:27 - Jan 30 with 4719 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:26 - Jan 30 by Basuco |
It should be down to the UK public to vote on the brexit deal as it stands or stay in the EU, at least this time we will know for sure what we are voting on, unlike the lies and deceit from both sides before the last vote. |
Here is the thing, Brexit has been totally upside down - a lot of the planning and groundwork should have been in place before the ballot was constructed - it was not, so, 2 months of confusion remains following nearly 2 years of futility. [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:28]
| |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:30 - Jan 30 with 4707 views | No9 |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:02 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
The no deal vote is not legally binding...so we leave, and let the EU enjoy their forthcoming massive recession!! |
Er, can you explain that?
I don't think you understand what's going on do you? | | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:34 - Jan 30 with 4676 views | jjblue84 |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:30 - Jan 30 by No9 |
Er, can you explain that?
I don't think you understand what's going on do you? |
What bit are you struggling with, love? | | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:35 - Jan 30 with 4688 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:34 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
What bit are you struggling with, love? |
Pure WUM [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:35]
| |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:39 - Jan 30 with 4671 views | SpruceMoose |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:35 - Jan 30 by wkj |
Pure WUM [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 17:35]
|
Whack him on the div list mate. I've coughed up funnier and more insightful things than him. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:44 - Jan 30 with 4659 views | wkj |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:39 - Jan 30 by SpruceMoose |
Whack him on the div list mate. I've coughed up funnier and more insightful things than him. |
Good call | |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:44 - Jan 30 with 4661 views | No9 |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:34 - Jan 30 by jjblue84 |
What bit are you struggling with, love? |
The last bit Susie | | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 18:41 - Jan 30 with 4588 views | pickles110564 |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 17:30 - Jan 30 by No9 |
Er, can you explain that?
I don't think you understand what's going on do you? |
To be fair Ireland is looking at a recession if there is a no deal.
A lot of countries in Europe are already if not close to being bankrupt. |  | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 18:42 - Jan 30 with 4590 views | Pecker |
If they want a hard border, let Europe build it and man it. If we say we are not going to have one, what can they do. |  | | |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 18:43 - Jan 30 with 4577 views | SpruceMoose |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 18:42 - Jan 30 by Pecker |
If they want a hard border, let Europe build it and man it. If we say we are not going to have one, what can they do. |
Jesus wept. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 18:45 - Jan 30 with 4573 views | Durovigutum |
| So if EU says no more talks, and No-deal was voted against on 18:42 - Jan 30 by Pecker |
If they want a hard border, let Europe build it and man it. If we say we are not going to have one, what can they do. |
Sue us under international law. [Post edited 30 Jan 2019 18:45]
|  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
