| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? 17:02 - Mar 2 with 19663 views | Bluefish |
Worse than Hurst.
Time to accept the mistake, he is not the man to rebuild us |  |
| |  |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:04 - Mar 2 with 8264 views | BlueBadger |
Nah, we'll win the division on the strength of Improved Performances and how many trophy winning players get invited to nice dinners at PR. |  |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:06 - Mar 2 with 8205 views | Mach_foreignBlue |
Players need to look at themselves too. |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 with 8167 views | jasondozzell |
Ridiculous post. Not Lambert's fault! [Post edited 2 Mar 2019 17:08]
|  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 with 8160 views | Bluefish |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:06 - Mar 2 by Mach_foreignBlue |
Players need to look at themselves too. |
If they aren't good enough he shouldn't pick them, that is how it works. | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 with 8156 views | floridaboy |
Worst then Hurst. Really!! The damage was done before Lambert was appointed.
Pretty certain if Lambert had been here from the start of the season not many of the players that Hurst signed would be at the club now. That is a gurantee!!!
Hurst screwed our club. Live with it! |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 with 8135 views | BlueBadger |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 by Bluefish |
If they aren't good enough he shouldn't pick them, that is how it works. |
Trouble is, the ones they're keeping out are even worse. | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 with 8130 views | RegencyBlue |
So who is, bearing in mind he will have to labour under the Evans regime? |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:08 - Mar 2 with 8087 views | chicoazul |
I'm not there yet Blubbers but im almost with you. Someone else said that he has had a rotten hand dealt with the injuries we've had and this feels like a fair point. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:09 - Mar 2 with 8051 views | Mullysplace1 |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 by floridaboy |
Worst then Hurst. Really!! The damage was done before Lambert was appointed.
Pretty certain if Lambert had been here from the start of the season not many of the players that Hurst signed would be at the club now. That is a gurantee!!!
Hurst screwed our club. Live with it! |
The fans screwed our club when they got on Micks back! |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:09 - Mar 2 with 8052 views | Bluefish |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:04 - Mar 2 by BlueBadger |
Nah, we'll win the division on the strength of Improved Performances and how many trophy winning players get invited to nice dinners at PR. |
The sad thing is many are happy now and will give me abuse for pointing out the poor job Lambert has done. They would rather lose games than accept what has happened | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:09 - Mar 2 with 8006 views | Mach_foreignBlue |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 by Bluefish |
If they aren't good enough he shouldn't pick them, that is how it works. |
Hang on we've had plenty of 'experts ' here saying that Chambers, Knudsen and Skuse are essential players for this team. Those 'experts' should shut up too ! | | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 with 7936 views | Bluefish |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:07 - Mar 2 by floridaboy |
Worst then Hurst. Really!! The damage was done before Lambert was appointed.
Pretty certain if Lambert had been here from the start of the season not many of the players that Hurst signed would be at the club now. That is a gurantee!!!
Hurst screwed our club. Live with it! |
He wasn't even here long enough to cause that level of damage. Lambert has no excuses now, he's had long enough and cant beat Reading at home. We had more hope under Hurst | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 with 7935 views | Oxford_Blue |
Knee jerk post.
Lambert was appointed really to take us back up. He’s done the tbefore.
Sacking him would be inane | | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 with 7923 views | urbanblue |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:08 - Mar 2 by chicoazul |
I'm not there yet Blubbers but im almost with you. Someone else said that he has had a rotten hand dealt with the injuries we've had and this feels like a fair point. |
Not just the injuries .. most of the players he inherited are not good enough and he knows that. He's doing the best with what he's got.
Looking forward to him building his own team. |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 with 7915 views | BlueySwede |
Sigh...
Lambert can´t perform miracles, this team is just too bad.
Performances have improved a little bit, the atmosphere and togetherness seem to have improved as well.
Looking forward to seeing what Lambert can do for us next season. | | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:12 - Mar 2 with 7904 views | Bluefish |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 by Oxford_Blue |
Knee jerk post.
Lambert was appointed really to take us back up. He’s done the tbefore.
Sacking him would be inane |
He has scraped 2 one nil wins, Jewell was better than him | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:12 - Mar 2 with 7883 views | RegencyBlue |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:09 - Mar 2 by Mullysplace1 |
The fans screwed our club when they got on Micks back! |
With Evans of course being completely blameless! | | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:13 - Mar 2 with 7848 views | Trequartista |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 by Oxford_Blue |
Knee jerk post.
Lambert was appointed really to take us back up. He’s done the tbefore.
Sacking him would be inane |
He was appointed to keep us in this division. If we were appointing someone to be successful in League One, we might as well have kept the current League One manager of the year. |  |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:13 - Mar 2 with 7831 views | Bluefish |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:11 - Mar 2 by urbanblue |
Not just the injuries .. most of the players he inherited are not good enough and he knows that. He's doing the best with what he's got.
Looking forward to him building his own team. |
Players like quaner or Elder? | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:15 - Mar 2 with 7767 views | Trequartista |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:12 - Mar 2 by Bluefish |
He has scraped 2 one nil wins, Jewell was better than him |
I haven't done the maths, but I wonder where we'd now be in the table if we appointed a manager who acheived Jewell's win rate at Town (34%) | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:16 - Mar 2 with 7715 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:12 - Mar 2 by Bluefish |
He has scraped 2 one nil wins, Jewell was better than him |
With considerably better players. No comparison really. Give us all a rest |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:18 - Mar 2 with 7600 views | The_Major |
Righto, let's get rid of him then, shall we? And please advise who we should get instead, or indeed who would be willing to come here. Is Mr Curbishley still living in Woodbridge?
Sheesh. A combination of Guardiola, Wenger and Fergie holding a seance to talk to Shanks and Sir Bobby couldn't have turned this around, I'm afraid. |  | | |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:18 - Mar 2 with 7567 views | Herbivore |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:09 - Mar 2 by Bluefish |
The sad thing is many are happy now and will give me abuse for pointing out the poor job Lambert has done. They would rather lose games than accept what has happened |
Give it a fooking rest you clown. Supporting Town isn't about trying to score cheap points over your fellow fans. It's pathetic. |  |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:20 - Mar 2 with 7472 views | Bluefish |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:18 - Mar 2 by Herbivore |
Give it a fooking rest you clown. Supporting Town isn't about trying to score cheap points over your fellow fans. It's pathetic. |
Typical victim mentality from you. The OTT support for Lambert is about point scoring and not accepting how wrong they have it. Time to put the club 1st and accept how bad he has been | |
| |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:21 - Mar 2 with 7432 views | Trequartista |
| Is there any point in keeping Lambert on? on 17:18 - Mar 2 by The_Major |
Righto, let's get rid of him then, shall we? And please advise who we should get instead, or indeed who would be willing to come here. Is Mr Curbishley still living in Woodbridge?
Sheesh. A combination of Guardiola, Wenger and Fergie holding a seance to talk to Shanks and Sir Bobby couldn't have turned this around, I'm afraid. |
I don't think some better transfer window signings and 6 wins in 20 games is beyond the capabilities of most decent managers. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
