By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It was a fair question just found the awkward silence brilliant to listen to. At least he let you off the hook in the end Phil.
In my defence, for the first time in literally years I didn't write the team news piece mentioning ins and outs on Tuesday as I was running late due to getting stuck in traffic on the way. Having said that, I probably would have forgotten who was in and who was out by lunchtime today anyway.
0
Questions for Phil on 22:30 - Mar 14 with 706 views
In my defence, for the first time in literally years I didn't write the team news piece mentioning ins and outs on Tuesday as I was running late due to getting stuck in traffic on the way. Having said that, I probably would have forgotten who was in and who was out by lunchtime today anyway.
For 'stuck in traffic' read 'doing my hair'.
footers QC - Prosecution Barrister, Hasketon Law Chambers
In my defence, for the first time in literally years I didn't write the team news piece mentioning ins and outs on Tuesday as I was running late due to getting stuck in traffic on the way. Having said that, I probably would have forgotten who was in and who was out by lunchtime today anyway.
Is the "Mitchell brothers" thing with you and Watson real by the way or an internet myth?
To be fair, it is right for Phil to ask Lambert to justify the changes and perfectly fair for Lambert to forcefully defend them.
True, would have been fair on both fronts, and I think that's where PL thought I was going, but I was only really asking about Jonas given the comment he made after the game the other night.
1
Questions for Phil on 22:32 - Mar 14 with 701 views