Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal 19:50 - Mar 26 with 2032 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior | Yes or no? | | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:50 - Mar 26 with 2025 views | J2BLUE | No. Second referendum is though. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:53 - Mar 26 with 2005 views | Bluefish |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:50 - Mar 26 by J2BLUE | No. Second referendum is though. |
That is revoke | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:54 - Mar 26 with 1998 views | Swansea_Blue | I’d say no. On the basis that no deal is still the legal default. And neither have a cat in hell’s chance by the look of it. So equally ‘no’. I wish someone had the balls to say ‘look, this is all based on a pack of lies and illegal campaigning, and we now know is baseless self-harming. Let’s call the whole thing off’. Nobody will though. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:54 - Mar 26 with 1997 views | J2BLUE |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:53 - Mar 26 by Bluefish | That is revoke |
Thought he meant revoked by parliament without a referendum as per the options they are predicted to vote on. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:56 - Mar 26 with 1992 views | allezlesbleus |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:54 - Mar 26 by Swansea_Blue | I’d say no. On the basis that no deal is still the legal default. And neither have a cat in hell’s chance by the look of it. So equally ‘no’. I wish someone had the balls to say ‘look, this is all based on a pack of lies and illegal campaigning, and we now know is baseless self-harming. Let’s call the whole thing off’. Nobody will though. |
My thoughts exactly. The whole thing has been a complete and utter shambles, from start to finish. | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:56 - Mar 26 with 1990 views | Suffolktractor | Don’t ask ‘yes or no’ questions, if we don’t like the answer we will just ignore it anyway. | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:57 - Mar 26 with 1973 views | Bluefish |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:54 - Mar 26 by J2BLUE | Thought he meant revoked by parliament without a referendum as per the options they are predicted to vote on. |
He probably did, I wasn't criticising i was just joining the dots. No chance a 2nd referendum with remain as an option would see leave win again | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:58 - Mar 26 with 1971 views | giant_stow |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:56 - Mar 26 by Suffolktractor | Don’t ask ‘yes or no’ questions, if we don’t like the answer we will just ignore it anyway. |
The can be a rubbish innit, especially on complicated stuff. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:58 - Mar 26 with 1969 views | JakeITFC | Yes, massively. | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:59 - Mar 26 with 1959 views | BloomBlue |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:53 - Mar 26 by Bluefish | That is revoke |
No a second referendum wouldn't include a remain option so it's not the same. | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:00 - Mar 26 with 1951 views | Bluefish |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:59 - Mar 26 by BloomBlue | No a second referendum wouldn't include a remain option so it's not the same. |
You don't know that. The result will be that softest option on the paper. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:00 - Mar 26 with 1954 views | Suffolktractor |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:54 - Mar 26 by Swansea_Blue | I’d say no. On the basis that no deal is still the legal default. And neither have a cat in hell’s chance by the look of it. So equally ‘no’. I wish someone had the balls to say ‘look, this is all based on a pack of lies and illegal campaigning, and we now know is baseless self-harming. Let’s call the whole thing off’. Nobody will though. |
Not sure all the people that voted leave did so due to lies and illegal campaigning. Some of them have opinions and can think for themselves. | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:00 - Mar 26 with 1949 views | J2BLUE |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 19:59 - Mar 26 by BloomBlue | No a second referendum wouldn't include a remain option so it's not the same. |
You're a muppet if you believe that. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:04 - Mar 26 with 1935 views | Bluefish |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:00 - Mar 26 by Suffolktractor | Not sure all the people that voted leave did so due to lies and illegal campaigning. Some of them have opinions and can think for themselves. |
The portion that voted leave due to believing the lies will change to remain or not vote. The rest that voted due to being racists or little englanders will still vote leave. The majority of the population will vote remain | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:08 - Mar 26 with 1916 views | Suffolktractor |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:04 - Mar 26 by Bluefish | The portion that voted leave due to believing the lies will change to remain or not vote. The rest that voted due to being racists or little englanders will still vote leave. The majority of the population will vote remain |
Good news, from your maths that means racism is a minority thing in this country. | | | |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:12 - Mar 26 with 1909 views | Bluefish |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:08 - Mar 26 by Suffolktractor | Good news, from your maths that means racism is a minority thing in this country. |
It is | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 21:17 - Mar 26 with 1803 views | BlueBadger | Sadly, probably no. Because 'revoke' would involve leadership on both sides of the house putting the country before their own petty concerns. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 21:19 - Mar 26 with 1799 views | BlueBadger |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:00 - Mar 26 by Suffolktractor | Not sure all the people that voted leave did so due to lies and illegal campaigning. Some of them have opinions and can think for themselves. |
The fact that a large number listened to the likes of Boris and seem reluctant to change their minds in the face of the accumulated evidence that it's a patently stupid idea suggests otherwise, I fear. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 21:33 - Mar 26 with 1775 views | factual_blue | It depends. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 21:43 - Mar 26 with 1755 views | factual_blue |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 20:00 - Mar 26 by Suffolktractor | Not sure all the people that voted leave did so due to lies and illegal campaigning. Some of them have opinions and can think for themselves. |
Your last five words were incorrectly included. | |
| |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 22:26 - Mar 26 with 1712 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Quick question is revoke more likely than no deal on 21:19 - Mar 26 by BlueBadger | The fact that a large number listened to the likes of Boris and seem reluctant to change their minds in the face of the accumulated evidence that it's a patently stupid idea suggests otherwise, I fear. |
This is my fear. We live in our echo chambers and enjoy the polls that suit our own views so we tend to think a second referendum would favour remain. However, few of the leave voters I know have actually changed their minds, or if they have they are keeping very quiet about it. Even some who I suspect may have voted remain argue that the democratic thing is to leave because that was the result of the referendum. I would be no more sure of remain as the outcome of a second referendum than the first time round (although I was surprised that time). I think a lot would depend on the wording on the ballot paper. What gets me is still this tribalist "we won, you lost" rather than any thought or suggestion of what is for the best. There would be 2 potential disasters if a second referendum happened. One is a vote for a hard Brexit (if it were offered) or a similar 48-52 type outcome. The other would be a remain 52%-leave 48% type outcome. What a mess it all is. That said, I think it should be put back to the electorate now there is some clarity over what leave might mean. e.g. May deal v remain or two options remain v leave followed by May deal v no deal. Hopefully there will be an even softer option on the table by the time it goes to a referendum if it does. More likely a softer option might gain a consensus in parliament in my opinion but who really knows. | |
| |
| |