Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
About time they came off for bad light 18:51 - Sep 6 with 544 viewsFtnfwest

Roy was struggling but never saw the one that bowled him and even Stokes was getting hit on the gloves by 82 mph bouncers. Not enough I’m afraid unless Stokes blasts another 100
0
About time they came off for bad light on 19:55 - Sep 6 with 487 viewsBloomBlue

Not sure you can blame bad light for Roy's inability to test bat. Needs to be dropped now, great at limited overs, lacking at test level.
0
About time they came off for bad light on 20:45 - Sep 6 with 457 viewsBrianTablet

Surely there's enough light from his flashes outside off stump

"......Paul Mariner......John Wark...... Brian Tablet...errrrrrr Talbot"
Poll: In a hellish scenario, would you rather...

0
About time they came off for bad light on 20:56 - Sep 6 with 446 viewsFtnfwest

About time they came off for bad light on 19:55 - Sep 6 by BloomBlue

Not sure you can blame bad light for Roy's inability to test bat. Needs to be dropped now, great at limited overs, lacking at test level.


Indeed not good enough. I felt slightly sorry for him when they said how terrible he was on the box and then when bairstow walked in kept going on about how gloomy it was and what a difficult period it was for him to come into. Stokes is world class and he was getting hit.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024