I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ 22:48 - Oct 5 with 1927 views | Ftnfwest | I’m not exactly a Leicester fan but that was ridiculous. How can the mighty VAR not overturn that? Mane just stuck his foot on the floor, twisted it a bit and fell over | | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 23:24 - Oct 5 with 1831 views | leftback | But albrighton kicked him | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 23:31 - Oct 5 with 1809 views | Ftnfwest |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 23:24 - Oct 5 by leftback | But albrighton kicked him |
You must be right as Mane was in complete agony after Albrighton touched him, until the decision was confirmed | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 01:53 - Oct 6 with 1689 views | Illinoisblue | Penalty all day long. | |
| |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:11 - Oct 6 with 1524 views | StokieBlue |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 23:31 - Oct 5 by Ftnfwest | You must be right as Mane was in complete agony after Albrighton touched him, until the decision was confirmed |
I've not seen it but since when did someone have to be hurt for it to be a penalty? SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:19 - Oct 6 with 1503 views | Ftnfwest |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:11 - Oct 6 by StokieBlue | I've not seen it but since when did someone have to be hurt for it to be a penalty? SB |
Not being questioned. Merely pointing out he was in agony, briefly | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:19 - Oct 6 with 1509 views | itfcjoe |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 01:53 - Oct 6 by Illinoisblue | Penalty all day long. |
Really?! He gets a tap on his standing leg, then takes the ball away with his other one before chucking himself to the ground | |
| |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:46 - Oct 6 with 1428 views | DarkHorse | It was both a penalty and a dive. | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 09:22 - Oct 6 with 1352 views | Herbivore |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:46 - Oct 6 by DarkHorse | It was both a penalty and a dive. |
How so? Contact does not equal a foul. Football is a contact sport. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 09:32 - Oct 6 with 1323 views | Ftnfwest |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 09:22 - Oct 6 by Herbivore | How so? Contact does not equal a foul. Football is a contact sport. |
Indeed. In any event i guess what I was originally driving at is that ultimately VAR can tell us when someone’s toenail is offside 30 seconds before a ‘goal’ is scored but not when someone’s blatantly play acting | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 09:43 - Oct 6 with 1299 views | m14_blue |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 08:19 - Oct 6 by itfcjoe | Really?! He gets a tap on his standing leg, then takes the ball away with his other one before chucking himself to the ground |
This. If any contact between legs in the box is now a pen then they need to make that clear in the rules. He wasn’t impeded in any way and threw himself to the ground 2 seconds later. VAR will pick up the slightest contact and therefore back up the decision but that’s not the sport I want football to be. | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 10:52 - Oct 6 with 1243 views | The_Last_Baron |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 01:53 - Oct 6 by Illinoisblue | Penalty all day long. |
Was it bullocks. A terrible decision. | |
| |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 12:59 - Oct 6 with 1169 views | Wickets | Bit of a trick one as Mane did get caught but it took 10 seconds for him to decide to hit the deck ! | | | |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 13:23 - Oct 6 with 1145 views | Trequartista |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 23:24 - Oct 5 by leftback | But albrighton kicked him |
The contact was not enough to impede him. | |
| |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 13:24 - Oct 6 with 1144 views | Herbivore |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 13:23 - Oct 6 by Trequartista | The contact was not enough to impede him. |
Correct. Blimey, we agree on something. | |
| |
I’ve only just seen this Liverpool ‘penalty’ on 13:25 - Oct 6 with 1143 views | Trequartista | VAR won't overturn anything where there is contact. "There was contact" is one of the big problems of the modern game. The rules are there to stop a player *impeding* another player. As soon as you say that "there was contact" means it is a foul, you just permit players falling to the ground when they were not actually impeded, as was the case with Mane's ridiculous dive. | |
| |
| |