Labour should have walked this election. 13:39 - Dec 5 with 5944 views | usm | It was/is there for the taking, but Corbyn is simply unelectable. Far too much of a risk, economically and security so it looks like its going to be the Tories again, largely due to the lack of a viable alternative. | |
| | |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:46 - Dec 6 with 690 views | Herbivore |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:40 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue | all the ifs has looked at is how labour will fund it. they haven't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences. |
That's not all they've looked out, but you are rather mypoic in your seeking and digesting of news and analysis. | |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:47 - Dec 6 with 688 views | lowhouseblue |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:46 - Dec 6 by Herbivore | That's not all they've looked out, but you are rather mypoic in your seeking and digesting of news and analysis. |
link? | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:49 - Dec 6 with 676 views | BLUEGOLD |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:36 - Dec 6 by ZedRodgers | And that the current Chancellor is so fiscally astute that he was at Deutsche Bank in 2008 handing out subprime mortgages. |
But it was all labours fault. They made him do it. | | | |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:50 - Dec 6 with 673 views | footers |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:37 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue | i have shown my working on multiple threads. if you take an economy at full employment and pump in a £trillion of new spending it won't end well. the £ will fall, interest rates will rise, prises will rise, private investment will collapse. there isn't an economic model in existence that won't show that outcome. and your only defence is 'well, in practice they won't manage to spend everything they've promised". jeez. |
Again, your support for Brexit runs counter to all of that. The pound has fallen dramatically and 'investment' is now foreign interests purchasing undervalued UK assets. But you don't have a defence at all for your reckless economic strategy. Maybe because it's completely stupid. Jeez. | |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:51 - Dec 6 with 667 views | Herbivore |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:47 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue | link? |
Do your own work. They published what the parties' spending would look like should we not get a comprehensive free trade deal with the EU, which we don't have time to achieve under the Tory manifesto, and it leads to far greater borrowing under the Tories than under Labour. | |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:55 - Dec 6 with 654 views | lowhouseblue |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:50 - Dec 6 by footers | Again, your support for Brexit runs counter to all of that. The pound has fallen dramatically and 'investment' is now foreign interests purchasing undervalued UK assets. But you don't have a defence at all for your reckless economic strategy. Maybe because it's completely stupid. Jeez. |
err, right, ok then. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:59 - Dec 6 with 644 views | lowhouseblue |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:51 - Dec 6 by Herbivore | Do your own work. They published what the parties' spending would look like should we not get a comprehensive free trade deal with the EU, which we don't have time to achieve under the Tory manifesto, and it leads to far greater borrowing under the Tories than under Labour. |
so they haven't produced an economic forecast of macro performance under corbyn. just to be clear. [Post edited 6 Dec 2019 12:59]
| |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:00 - Dec 6 with 638 views | Herbivore |
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:59 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue | so they haven't produced an economic forecast of macro performance under corbyn. just to be clear. [Post edited 6 Dec 2019 12:59]
|
There go those goalposts...... | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:04 - Dec 6 with 630 views | lowhouseblue |
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:00 - Dec 6 by Herbivore | There go those goalposts...... |
me: "all the ifs has looked at is how labour will fund it. they haven't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences." you: "That's not all they've looked out" but we then establish that the ifs hasn't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences. so how do goalposts come into it? | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:11 - Dec 6 with 618 views | Herbivore |
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:04 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue | me: "all the ifs has looked at is how labour will fund it. they haven't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences." you: "That's not all they've looked out" but we then establish that the ifs hasn't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences. so how do goalposts come into it? |
We were talking about comparisons with a Tory Brexit. Your myopia is quite staggering. They are small goalposts but all the better for you to move easily. | |
| |
| |