Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Labour should have walked this election. 13:39 - Dec 5 with 5944 viewsusm

It was/is there for the taking, but Corbyn is simply unelectable.
Far too much of a risk, economically and security so it looks like its going to be the Tories again, largely due to the lack of a viable alternative.

FOYSC
Poll: Did Broad just get a hat trick without realising ?

1
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:46 - Dec 6 with 690 viewsHerbivore

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:40 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue

all the ifs has looked at is how labour will fund it. they haven't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences.


That's not all they've looked out, but you are rather mypoic in your seeking and digesting of news and analysis.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:47 - Dec 6 with 688 viewslowhouseblue

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:46 - Dec 6 by Herbivore

That's not all they've looked out, but you are rather mypoic in your seeking and digesting of news and analysis.


link?

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

0
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:49 - Dec 6 with 676 viewsBLUEGOLD

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:36 - Dec 6 by ZedRodgers

And that the current Chancellor is so fiscally astute that he was at Deutsche Bank in 2008 handing out subprime mortgages.


But it was all labours fault. They made him do it.
1
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:50 - Dec 6 with 673 viewsfooters

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:37 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue

i have shown my working on multiple threads. if you take an economy at full employment and pump in a £trillion of new spending it won't end well. the £ will fall, interest rates will rise, prises will rise, private investment will collapse. there isn't an economic model in existence that won't show that outcome.

and your only defence is 'well, in practice they won't manage to spend everything they've promised". jeez.


Again, your support for Brexit runs counter to all of that. The pound has fallen dramatically and 'investment' is now foreign interests purchasing undervalued UK assets.

But you don't have a defence at all for your reckless economic strategy. Maybe because it's completely stupid. Jeez.

footers KC - Prosecution Barrister - Friend to all
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

1
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:51 - Dec 6 with 667 viewsHerbivore

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:47 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue

link?


Do your own work. They published what the parties' spending would look like should we not get a comprehensive free trade deal with the EU, which we don't have time to achieve under the Tory manifesto, and it leads to far greater borrowing under the Tories than under Labour.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:55 - Dec 6 with 654 viewslowhouseblue

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:50 - Dec 6 by footers

Again, your support for Brexit runs counter to all of that. The pound has fallen dramatically and 'investment' is now foreign interests purchasing undervalued UK assets.

But you don't have a defence at all for your reckless economic strategy. Maybe because it's completely stupid. Jeez.


err, right, ok then.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-1
Labour should have walked this election. on 12:59 - Dec 6 with 644 viewslowhouseblue

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:51 - Dec 6 by Herbivore

Do your own work. They published what the parties' spending would look like should we not get a comprehensive free trade deal with the EU, which we don't have time to achieve under the Tory manifesto, and it leads to far greater borrowing under the Tories than under Labour.


so they haven't produced an economic forecast of macro performance under corbyn. just to be clear.
[Post edited 6 Dec 2019 12:59]

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-2
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:00 - Dec 6 with 638 viewsHerbivore

Labour should have walked this election. on 12:59 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue

so they haven't produced an economic forecast of macro performance under corbyn. just to be clear.
[Post edited 6 Dec 2019 12:59]


There go those goalposts......

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1
Login to get fewer ads

Labour should have walked this election. on 13:04 - Dec 6 with 630 viewslowhouseblue

Labour should have walked this election. on 13:00 - Dec 6 by Herbivore

There go those goalposts......


me: "all the ifs has looked at is how labour will fund it. they haven't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences."

you: "That's not all they've looked out"

but we then establish that the ifs hasn't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences. so how do goalposts come into it?

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

0
Labour should have walked this election. on 13:11 - Dec 6 with 618 viewsHerbivore

Labour should have walked this election. on 13:04 - Dec 6 by lowhouseblue

me: "all the ifs has looked at is how labour will fund it. they haven't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences."

you: "That's not all they've looked out"

but we then establish that the ifs hasn't looked at the wider macroeconomic consequences. so how do goalposts come into it?


We were talking about comparisons with a Tory Brexit. Your myopia is quite staggering. They are small goalposts but all the better for you to move easily.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024