| Is this allowed? 10:43 - Dec 12 with 1031 views | Ryorry |
|  |
| |  |
| Is this allowed? on 10:45 - Dec 12 with 996 views | Herbivore |
The short answer appears to be 'no' from what I've read. |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 10:48 - Dec 12 with 983 views | DanTheMan |
Saw this doing the rounds. Seen very differing opinions on whether she has broken the law. |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 10:50 - Dec 12 with 966 views | BackToRussia |
It's the Beeb wot won it [Post edited 12 Dec 2019 10:51]
|  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 10:57 - Dec 12 with 935 views | Ryorry |
| Is this allowed? on 10:48 - Dec 12 by DanTheMan |
Saw this doing the rounds. Seen very differing opinions on whether she has broken the law. |
Saw one saying this so far breaches rules that it actually invalidates the GE, which should therefore be declared void! | |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 11:33 - Dec 12 with 837 views | chicoazul |
Anything that annoys Andrew Adonis is alright by me. |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 11:41 - Dec 12 with 825 views | homer_123 |
| Is this allowed? on 10:57 - Dec 12 by Ryorry |
Saw one saying this so far breaches rules that it actually invalidates the GE, which should therefore be declared void! |
We cant agree on a 2nd ref let alone a second GE...lol |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 12:04 - Dec 12 with 796 views | Guthrum |
She reported a general impression based on what she had been told by people who made estimates based on glimpses of rapidly counted pieces of paper* representing a portion of the vote in some areas.
It's debateable what, if any, effect this will have on voting. It might encourage more to turn out, or it might go the other way, thinking they've already won/lost.
Still very naughty and she could well find herself in trouble personally (altho previous penalties for revealing postal vote numbers only amounted to a caution). But no real justification for challenging the result.
* I've done trying to work out the result from the verification counting. Almost impossible to be anywhere near accurate, given you're attempting to spot crosses against names looking over someone's shoulder while they count and stack them into bundles of 50 (not sorted by candidate at that stage) as fast as possible. |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 12:24 - Dec 12 with 749 views | baxterbasics |
This certainly isn't:
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Is this allowed? on 12:30 - Dec 12 with 711 views | Pinewoodblue |
Yes it is allowed. Fully entitled to take the matter up with Police and with BBC chairman. It is still a free country. |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 12:43 - Dec 12 with 676 views | Bluefish |
| Is this allowed? on 10:45 - Dec 12 by Herbivore |
The short answer appears to be 'no' from what I've read. |
Does it really matter or is just being blown up out of proportion to use as an excuse? |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 12:57 - Dec 12 with 632 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Is this allowed? on 12:24 - Dec 12 by baxterbasics |
This certainly isn't:
|
Not working this election for the first time in years so my memory may be a bit rusty but isn’t this fine - so long as not intimidating anyone* I thought it was ok to campaign outside a polling station, just not within one?
*only watched video with sound off at work so assume this isn’t the case |  |
| |
| Is this allowed? on 13:03 - Dec 12 with 591 views | mrshallisfit |
| Is this allowed? on 11:33 - Dec 12 by chicoazul |
Anything that annoys Andrew Adonis is alright by me. |
And there you have it. What a cretin you are. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
