| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) 15:41 - Dec 26 with 2148 views | Coco |
|  |
| |  |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:46 - Dec 26 with 1925 views | Terry_Nutkins |
Is that serious? |  |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:48 - Dec 26 with 1903 views | Coco |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:46 - Dec 26 by Terry_Nutkins |
Is that serious? |
Yep and seriously why the hell not? | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:03 - Dec 26 with 1800 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:48 - Dec 26 by Coco |
Yep and seriously why the hell not? |
I think we should stick with Lambert for the time being, however...
Burley as DoF all day long. Not convinced by Dyer though, maybe as assistant first. With Colin for 18 months |  |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:04 - Dec 26 with 1787 views | gerryitfc |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:03 - Dec 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
I think we should stick with Lambert for the time being, however...
Burley as DoF all day long. Not convinced by Dyer though, maybe as assistant first. With Colin for 18 months |
Lambert is not going to change though and he is a big part of our dire form. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:06 - Dec 26 with 1776 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:04 - Dec 26 by gerryitfc |
Lambert is not going to change though and he is a big part of our dire form. |
And Evans is not going to sack him. Have you learnt nothing about his track record. When we can't mathematically go up, he might think about it.
Until then, it'll be Lambert until at least Easter, get used to it. | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:08 - Dec 26 with 1766 views | gerryitfc |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:06 - Dec 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
And Evans is not going to sack him. Have you learnt nothing about his track record. When we can't mathematically go up, he might think about it.
Until then, it'll be Lambert until at least Easter, get used to it. |
He'll be gone before Easter if this form continues. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:56 - Dec 26 with 1649 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:48 - Dec 26 by Coco |
Yep and seriously why the hell not? |
Laughable.
Neither have anything going other than emotions of the fans and when the results are bad, the same fans will respond emotionally again and call for them to be sacked.
We might as well get Mick Mills and Paul Mariner. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:20 - Dec 26 with 1529 views | TractorWood |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:48 - Dec 26 by Coco |
Yep and seriously why the hell not? |
Dyer has never managed at a proper level and Burley hasn't managed in 10 years. Never appoint managers with a nostalgic heart. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:26 - Dec 26 with 1494 views | Terry_Nutkins |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 15:48 - Dec 26 by Coco |
Yep and seriously why the hell not? |
Because i don't believe in making any hiring decision in any walk of life or role on just having a punt based on absolutely no recent or relevant track record.
That's before i even get to the weird mindset of sacking a manager who has us in 2nd. It's just weird. Everyone is making decisions on emotions in their head. We're in rubbish form. It happens and its p'ing me right off but we're not sacking people in 2nd for god sake.
Lamberts needs to arrest the form but he's got the time, resources and experience to do it. | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:32 - Dec 26 with 1467 views | MrTown |
I would actually have Burley and Dyer. |  |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:35 - Dec 26 with 1451 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:32 - Dec 26 by MrTown |
I would actually have Burley and Dyer. |
Putting emotions aside, name three objective reasons why they would be successful. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:37 - Dec 26 with 1424 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:35 - Dec 26 by Oxford_Blue |
Putting emotions aside, name three objective reasons why they would be successful. |
I am starting to think you might be Paul Lambert |  |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:38 - Dec 26 with 1420 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:32 - Dec 26 by MrTown |
I would actually have Burley and Dyer. |
What about Butch? |  | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:43 - Dec 26 with 1387 views | TractorWood |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:37 - Dec 26 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
I am starting to think you might be Paul Lambert |
It's a totally valid question. We aren't progressing under Lambert but a nostalgic appointment based on absolutely no valid rationale is not the answer. | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:44 - Dec 26 with 1387 views | oneoffposter |
Can I just point out that Burley And Dyer Get on about as well as Ryan Giggs and his brother?? | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:46 - Dec 26 with 1370 views | MrTown |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:35 - Dec 26 by Oxford_Blue |
Putting emotions aside, name three objective reasons why they would be successful. |
I can’t. I didn’t say they would be actually, purely on emotions basis  .
Having said that, should Lambert to leave I cannot think of too many names that spring to mind. Maybe Nigel Adkins, did a very good job at Hull under terrible ownership (albeit with Grosiki and Bowen). | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 18:13 - Dec 26 with 1286 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 17:37 - Dec 26 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
I am starting to think you might be Paul Lambert |
Anyone who defends Evans is accused of being Evans. Anyone who takes a different view is told they are PL.
Strange. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 19:22 - Dec 26 with 1134 views | vapour_trail |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 18:13 - Dec 26 by Oxford_Blue |
Anyone who defends Evans is accused of being Evans. Anyone who takes a different view is told they are PL.
Strange. |
That is incorrect. You have made it up.
I thought you dealt with facts? |  |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 19:37 - Dec 26 with 1074 views | deano85 |
Burley and Holland on the other hand...
But seriously, i think we can all agree PLs not getting sacked....
Wether he will quit however...?
Also unlikely
But i bet Evans is on the phone now offering him a sports direct voucher war chest! | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 21:42 - Dec 26 with 968 views | The_Last_Baron |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:08 - Dec 26 by gerryitfc |
He'll be gone before Easter if this form continues. |
If this form continues he won't last until the end of January. |  |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 21:46 - Dec 26 with 959 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 19:22 - Dec 26 by vapour_trail |
That is incorrect. You have made it up.
I thought you dealt with facts? |
I’ve been accused of “being Evans” several times by pointing us he subsidises the club’s losses (there’s a fact for you).
I’ve been accused of being Lambert above. There’s another fact. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 21:51 - Dec 26 with 943 views | Coco |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 16:56 - Dec 26 by Oxford_Blue |
Laughable.
Neither have anything going other than emotions of the fans and when the results are bad, the same fans will respond emotionally again and call for them to be sacked.
We might as well get Mick Mills and Paul Mariner. |
Our record of hiring managers with ‘proven track records’ has been outstanding right? Let’s try something new with the support of something tested.
Lee Bowyer had no previous record in management
Where was Farke from?
Time we went back to what we’re good at, giving people a chance! | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 22:02 - Dec 26 with 916 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 21:51 - Dec 26 by Coco |
Our record of hiring managers with ‘proven track records’ has been outstanding right? Let’s try something new with the support of something tested.
Lee Bowyer had no previous record in management
Where was Farke from?
Time we went back to what we’re good at, giving people a chance! |
When it’s your millions at stake, I wonder whether you would take the same view.
In fact, Magilton had no record at all and was given a chance. The fans turned against him and wanted him sacked. McCarthy had a good record and now clearly did well with what he had - but the fans wanted him out. Hurst was a young and unproven manager and he was given a chance. He was a disaster and was sacked after just 14 games.
The evidence doesn’t support the idea that we don’t given untested managers a chance and it doesn’t support the idea that experienced managers are treated fairly either.
We are second. We are half way through the season. To sack lambert is really very stupid.
To appoint Burley would be a massive error. He hasn’t managed for 15 years. It would simply be harking back to a different era. | | | |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 22:11 - Dec 26 with 900 views | vapour_trail |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 21:46 - Dec 26 by Oxford_Blue |
I’ve been accused of “being Evans” several times by pointing us he subsidises the club’s losses (there’s a fact for you).
I’ve been accused of being Lambert above. There’s another fact. |
Still bo11ocls mate. Aren’t you a lawyer? | |
| |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 22:14 - Dec 26 with 878 views | Oxford_Blue |
| Dyer with Burley please. (n/t) on 22:11 - Dec 26 by vapour_trail |
Still bo11ocls mate. Aren’t you a lawyer? |
Ok so “every” was an overstatement. You’re right. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
