| CONCEDED FIVE V LINCOLN! LINCOLN!! 16:53 - Dec 29 with 726 views | Coco |
I suppose we have no divine right. |  |
| |  |
| CONCEDED FIVE V LINCOLN! LINCOLN!! on 17:02 - Dec 29 with 646 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
We do have no divine right.
A defence of Garbutt, Chambers, Woolfenden and Donacien …
changed to Garbutt, Chambers, Woolfenden and Edwards!
changed to Garbutt, Chambers, Wilson and Woolfenden.
He had Kenlock available (which then releases Garbutt and gives his defensive ability in the midfield) but what was the thinking behind Sears on for Donacien. Get Wilson on then instead.
Conceding 5 against an out-of-form Lincoln side is woeful. We did score 3 and have some striking options now but that defending was not good enough, even taking into account we were chasing the game. |  |
| |
| CONCEDED FIVE V LINCOLN! LINCOLN!! on 17:43 - Dec 29 with 575 views | Coco |
| CONCEDED FIVE V LINCOLN! LINCOLN!! on 17:02 - Dec 29 by Nthsuffolkblue |
We do have no divine right.
A defence of Garbutt, Chambers, Woolfenden and Donacien …
changed to Garbutt, Chambers, Woolfenden and Edwards!
changed to Garbutt, Chambers, Wilson and Woolfenden.
He had Kenlock available (which then releases Garbutt and gives his defensive ability in the midfield) but what was the thinking behind Sears on for Donacien. Get Wilson on then instead.
Conceding 5 against an out-of-form Lincoln side is woeful. We did score 3 and have some striking options now but that defending was not good enough, even taking into account we were chasing the game. |
Nobody has a divine right. It’s up to the manager to get a performance. Right? | |
| |
| CONCEDED FIVE V LINCOLN! LINCOLN!! on 17:47 - Dec 29 with 545 views | jas0999 |
It’s just a blip - or at least that’s what PL thinks. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
