By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Genuine and serious question. on 17:47 - Jan 4 by Swansea_Blue
Do you reckon? I'd hope not. We now he's not an adventurous chap be that'd be the equivalent of the mindset with Mick, but in a league lower and eqaully as likely to go the same way.
I genuinely think that’s the case.
A scenario like this.... 1 - Evans made it clear no major funds available 2 - Accepting promotion isn’t an easy grab 3 - Lambert saying he can make the club massive by using youth/no major signings/no major outlay 4 - But Lambert needs time 5 - Time more attractive to Evans than risky expenditure
Genuine and serious question. on 17:52 - Jan 4 by BLUEBEAT
I genuinely think that’s the case.
A scenario like this.... 1 - Evans made it clear no major funds available 2 - Accepting promotion isn’t an easy grab 3 - Lambert saying he can make the club massive by using youth/no major signings/no major outlay 4 - But Lambert needs time 5 - Time more attractive to Evans than risky expenditure
Genuine and serious question. on 17:25 - Jan 4 by 3_5_2
You are spot on but actually, how bad has it become where we are ship scared of Accringtin feckin Stanley!
[Post edited 4 Jan 2020 17:34]
I said this at work ... We are now a team scared of playing the likes of these teams ... I know teams raise their game against us & the so called " big teams" ... But surely our players & management staff must have pride & say things like " let's go out there & make a fooking statement to the league & other teams". I know one thing - THIS EFFING HURTS TO US FANS
1
Genuine and serious question. on 18:18 - Jan 4 with 612 views
Genuine and serious question. on 17:20 - Jan 4 by J2BLUE
We can only hope that the new deal was simply to try and stamp Lambert's authority on things. Perhaps it' little more than a slight pay increase and a set amount to pay him off?
Clutching at straws...
I think you are spot-on. There’s no way it is a five-year deal without there being a cheaper pay-off in the event of him being sacked. Smacks of the ‘eight-year’ deal Newcastle apparently gave Pardew, which was later proved to be nothing more than a rolling one-year contract. It’s all smoke and mirrors and has been since day one of Evans’ ownership.
0
Genuine and serious question. on 18:36 - Jan 4 with 556 views
Genuine and serious question. on 17:24 - Jan 4 by LankHenners
Even the 'league 1 tour p!ss the league' divs were always going to turn when they smelled a chance of a lack of promotion. I thought the goodwill he racked up was way out of proportion with what it should have been in the first place and I think we've seen the voice of the doubters getting stronger and picking up waverers to a point where the majority view is now, if not bluntly anti-Lambert, certainly tipping that way.
I think you'll find the majority view is limited to a handful of people on here. It's easy to lose sight of perspective when looking at in in isolation through a TWTD lens. There's plenty on the fence but not very many anti-Lambert and rightly so at this point in time.
I'd be surprised if we don't take 9 points form the next 3 games or rather, i demand 9 points from the next three games.
Genuine and serious question. on 18:36 - Jan 4 by Keaneish
I think you'll find the majority view is limited to a handful of people on here. It's easy to lose sight of perspective when looking at in in isolation through a TWTD lens. There's plenty on the fence but not very many anti-Lambert and rightly so at this point in time.
I'd be surprised if we don't take 9 points form the next 3 games or rather, i demand 9 points from the next three games.
You know that one of those 3 games is now away to Oxford?
0
Genuine and serious question. on 20:11 - Jan 4 with 477 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
