| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. 09:39 - Jan 12 with 1520 views | hoppy |
Thank you in advance. |  |
| |  |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 09:42 - Jan 12 with 1507 views | Bluefish |
Hopefully marcus will put another call in |  |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:10 - Jan 12 with 1461 views | strikalite |
That'll be the same starting eleven three games running, maybe he's got the message at last, don't fix it if it isn't broken..
He simply has too many choices really... |  | | |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:19 - Jan 12 with 1443 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:10 - Jan 12 by strikalite |
That'll be the same starting eleven three games running, maybe he's got the message at last, don't fix it if it isn't broken..
He simply has too many choices really... |
I don't think he does have too many choices, most of the first XI picks itself.
Need to stick wih a consistent team, and forget the narrative that goes with the daft rotation policy.
He does have the self imposed fixture pile up in a few weeks, but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. |  |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:21 - Jan 12 with 1436 views | Herbivore |
I do wonder if Huws will be up for another start after completing 90 minutes yesterday. I hope he is but we'll see. If not then Skuse is a perfectly capable deputy. |  |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:27 - Jan 12 with 1417 views | Bluefish |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:21 - Jan 12 by Herbivore |
I do wonder if Huws will be up for another start after completing 90 minutes yesterday. I hope he is but we'll see. If not then Skuse is a perfectly capable deputy. |
As we know I am a big Skuse fan but he will change the dynamic a fair bit from Huws. I would rather utilise Bishop instead. If we are settled on 532 then Dozzell and Skuse are going to struggle to play in midfield because they need to play further up the pitch. Skuse will contest the 3rd CB place with Wilson but Andre looks lost in our plan A | |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:29 - Jan 12 with 1411 views | Herbivore |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:27 - Jan 12 by Bluefish |
As we know I am a big Skuse fan but he will change the dynamic a fair bit from Huws. I would rather utilise Bishop instead. If we are settled on 532 then Dozzell and Skuse are going to struggle to play in midfield because they need to play further up the pitch. Skuse will contest the 3rd CB place with Wilson but Andre looks lost in our plan A |
Huws mostly sat deep yesterday as he had to cover for the overlapping centre backs. His role yesterday was not dissimilar to Skuse's, albeit he used the ball better than Skuse does. Bishop coming in would definitely unbalance us as we'd lose too much defensive solidity in the middle. | |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:29 - Jan 12 with 1410 views | BLUEBEAT |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:27 - Jan 12 by Bluefish |
As we know I am a big Skuse fan but he will change the dynamic a fair bit from Huws. I would rather utilise Bishop instead. If we are settled on 532 then Dozzell and Skuse are going to struggle to play in midfield because they need to play further up the pitch. Skuse will contest the 3rd CB place with Wilson but Andre looks lost in our plan A |
I tend to agree. Skuse does slow the tempo of the game right down. The most refreshing part for me from yesterday’s performance was the noticeable speed crank-up. |  |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:33 - Jan 12 with 1402 views | Bluefish |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:29 - Jan 12 by Herbivore |
Huws mostly sat deep yesterday as he had to cover for the overlapping centre backs. His role yesterday was not dissimilar to Skuse's, albeit he used the ball better than Skuse does. Bishop coming in would definitely unbalance us as we'd lose too much defensive solidity in the middle. |
I don't agree, in the 1st half Emyr played further up in a conventional CM 2 and that is where the damage was done. It was later that he dropped and Skuse was a great replacement. With 5 at the back we don't need the cdm cover we need to get the midfield further up and have clear support for the forwards. If you compare the role judge had yesterday to the one Nolan was having to play they are poles apart. Judge was there to link and float whereas Nolan was there to be defending high up and supporting the midfield. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:34 - Jan 12 with 1392 views | Herbivore |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:33 - Jan 12 by Bluefish |
I don't agree, in the 1st half Emyr played further up in a conventional CM 2 and that is where the damage was done. It was later that he dropped and Skuse was a great replacement. With 5 at the back we don't need the cdm cover we need to get the midfield further up and have clear support for the forwards. If you compare the role judge had yesterday to the one Nolan was having to play they are poles apart. Judge was there to link and float whereas Nolan was there to be defending high up and supporting the midfield. |
Disagree. | |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:36 - Jan 12 with 1390 views | Dyland |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:29 - Jan 12 by Herbivore |
Huws mostly sat deep yesterday as he had to cover for the overlapping centre backs. His role yesterday was not dissimilar to Skuse's, albeit he used the ball better than Skuse does. Bishop coming in would definitely unbalance us as we'd lose too much defensive solidity in the middle. |
Dozzers would also slot into the Huws role.
Bishop for Judge.
Skuse is versatile enough to cover the deep midfield role and CB or even RB. |  |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:36 - Jan 12 with 1379 views | Bluefish |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:34 - Jan 12 by Herbivore |
Disagree. |
Fair enough. We aren't far off though | |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:40 - Jan 12 with 1368 views | Bluefish |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:36 - Jan 12 by Dyland |
Dozzers would also slot into the Huws role.
Bishop for Judge.
Skuse is versatile enough to cover the deep midfield role and CB or even RB. |
Agree that Skuse is versatile enough to do many roles but his tendency is deeper as is Dozzell. Dozzell also doesn't have the steel of Huws and Downes yesterday, they have a fantastic balance to the team. I also prefer Bishop deeper in CM, he does his best work in that crowd and being able to move us up the pitch by dropping a shoulder and driving into the space. The role Judge had yesterday is little intricate stuff, Teddy can do it but he is better at CM
Nice that we are starting to get a style and identity and we are putting player is positions for a change instead of trying to decide the shape afterwards | |
| |
| I don't disagree buh (n/t) on 10:41 - Jan 12 with 1350 views | Dyland |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:40 - Jan 12 by Bluefish |
Agree that Skuse is versatile enough to do many roles but his tendency is deeper as is Dozzell. Dozzell also doesn't have the steel of Huws and Downes yesterday, they have a fantastic balance to the team. I also prefer Bishop deeper in CM, he does his best work in that crowd and being able to move us up the pitch by dropping a shoulder and driving into the space. The role Judge had yesterday is little intricate stuff, Teddy can do it but he is better at CM
Nice that we are starting to get a style and identity and we are putting player is positions for a change instead of trying to decide the shape afterwards |
| |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 13:15 - Jan 12 with 1244 views | Bobbychase |
Playing a different side. I don't think he has to keep EXACTLY the same team every week. The opposition has different strengths and weaknesses which we can exploit/defend against |  |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 14:00 - Jan 12 with 1188 views | blueislander |
Hoppy. Did you listen to Tabby’s comments at the Exeter match? ‘Eee’s great is Taggy! |  | | |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 15:40 - Jan 12 with 1120 views | hoppy |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 13:15 - Jan 12 by Bobbychase |
Playing a different side. I don't think he has to keep EXACTLY the same team every week. The opposition has different strengths and weaknesses which we can exploit/defend against |
I get what you’re saying, but I think after yesterday’s performance and result, the same lineup would be the best bet, as many of them will have benefitted in confidence and could carry that into the next match. Concentrating more on our own strengths and letting the opposition worry about us for a change rather than messing around trying to counter the opposition - as that clearly hasn’t worked. Using this team for consecutive matches where possible will keep that momentum going. | |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 16:03 - Jan 12 with 1053 views | southnorfolkblue |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:21 - Jan 12 by Herbivore |
I do wonder if Huws will be up for another start after completing 90 minutes yesterday. I hope he is but we'll see. If not then Skuse is a perfectly capable deputy. |
Huws has been wrapped in cotton wool for long enough. Think it’s time for him to step up and show that he can play back to back games. | |
| |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 16:17 - Jan 12 with 1020 views | Herbivore |
| Same team Tuesday please, Paul. on 10:40 - Jan 12 by Bluefish |
Agree that Skuse is versatile enough to do many roles but his tendency is deeper as is Dozzell. Dozzell also doesn't have the steel of Huws and Downes yesterday, they have a fantastic balance to the team. I also prefer Bishop deeper in CM, he does his best work in that crowd and being able to move us up the pitch by dropping a shoulder and driving into the space. The role Judge had yesterday is little intricate stuff, Teddy can do it but he is better at CM
Nice that we are starting to get a style and identity and we are putting player is positions for a change instead of trying to decide the shape afterwards |
Ultimately I think our best side involves going to a 4-3-3 so we can have a midfield trio of Downes, Huws and Bishop, with a front three of Sears and Jackson either side of Keane or Norwood centrally. I still think unless we sign a ball playing left sided CB we're a bit unbalanced at the back. Accrington had nothing to hurt us yesterday but I wonder how sustainable it is for Chambers to bomb on as an overlapping CB in the same way he did yesterday. His legs are ageing and better sides would exploit that space. With what we have at our disposal currently I'd still prefer the a back four and a 4-3-3 formation. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
