Shame Watford were already down 15:23 - Jan 12 with 1225 views | Bluefish | It would have been a great escape | |
| | |
Shame Watford were already down on 15:50 - Jan 12 with 1148 views | ronnyd | They,re not that far adrift though. In fact, as it stands, they are out of the bottom three. [Post edited 12 Jan 2020 15:59]
| | | |
Shame Watford were already down on 15:54 - Jan 12 with 1120 views | SitfcB | Yeah, can’t see Pearson saving them. Their fans have been great as well. | |
| |
Shame Watford were already down on 15:59 - Jan 12 with 1084 views | SE1blue |
Shame Watford were already down on 15:54 - Jan 12 by SitfcB | Yeah, can’t see Pearson saving them. Their fans have been great as well. |
I'd like to see Bournemouth go down. And possibly West Ham. I've assumed that Norwich have already thrown in the towel. | |
| |
Shame Watford were already down on 16:02 - Jan 12 with 1067 views | Dubtractor | Whilst Lambert did a poor job last season, you can't ignore that Watford have a decent squad of players, whereas Lambert inherited Hurst's League one/two allstars. | |
| |
Shame Watford were already down on 16:16 - Jan 12 with 989 views | Steve_M |
Shame Watford were already down on 16:02 - Jan 12 by Dubtractor | Whilst Lambert did a poor job last season, you can't ignore that Watford have a decent squad of players, whereas Lambert inherited Hurst's League one/two allstars. |
It's Blubbers, of course he can. | |
| |
Shame Watford were already down on 16:41 - Jan 12 with 881 views | ronnyd |
Shame Watford were already down on 16:31 - Jan 12 by SitfcB | |
Your point? | | | |
Shame Watford were already down on 17:36 - Jan 12 with 748 views | catch74 |
Shame Watford were already down on 16:41 - Jan 12 by ronnyd | Your point? |
Have a think about the point the OP is trying to make. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Shame Watford were already down on 17:38 - Jan 12 with 738 views | m14_blue | We won 4-1 yesterday. Any danger of just giving it a rest for a couple of days at least? | | | |
| |