| Is this now our strongest side? 11:17 - Jan 14 with 892 views | Smithy |
Holy
Vincent-Young Chambers Woolfenden Earl Garbutt
Downes Huws
Judge
Norwood Jackson
Subs: Norris, Wilson, Skuse, Dozzell, Bishop, Sears, Keane
Others: Kenlock, Donacien, Edwards, Rowe, Nolan |  |
| |  |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:19 - Jan 14 with 883 views | Superfrans |
With a caveat being that none of us (I would wager) have yet seen Earl play, that would be my first choice XI... possibly with Nolan or Bishop instead of Judge. |  |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:20 - Jan 14 with 869 views | Smithy |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:19 - Jan 14 by Superfrans |
With a caveat being that none of us (I would wager) have yet seen Earl play, that would be my first choice XI... possibly with Nolan or Bishop instead of Judge. |
Yep agree with Bishop/Judge, but Nolan wouldn't get near the first 11 for me | |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:24 - Jan 14 with 842 views | BiGDonnie |
I'd swap Keane for one of the strikers. |  |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:28 - Jan 14 with 829 views | Superfrans |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:20 - Jan 14 by Smithy |
Yep agree with Bishop/Judge, but Nolan wouldn't get near the first 11 for me |
He's been one of our best players this season imho. | |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:29 - Jan 14 with 824 views | Bluefish |
That is the same side that I posted in September as our strongest side except Skuse for Earl and moving Woolf over |  |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:32 - Jan 14 with 810 views | Steve_M |
If we ignore the penalty for a moment (and it was stupid) then one of the reasons we had a base to play from the back was Wilson's no nonsense defending. Worth keeping that in mind for some games. |  |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:35 - Jan 14 with 790 views | StokieBlue |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:28 - Jan 14 by Superfrans |
He's been one of our best players this season imho. |
I don't think that's right.
He's consistent but his play is not what is required. He takes the ball and either passes it straight back in the same direction or backwards. He slows us down and offers very little going forward.
He's miles away from Huws even at this stage of his comeback.
SB [Post edited 14 Jan 2020 11:36]
|  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:36 - Jan 14 with 787 views | Superfrans |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:32 - Jan 14 by Steve_M |
If we ignore the penalty for a moment (and it was stupid) then one of the reasons we had a base to play from the back was Wilson's no nonsense defending. Worth keeping that in mind for some games. |
I've been less impressed with Wilson in recent weeks. He was excellent earlier in the season, before signing his new contract. But less so since November... | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:37 - Jan 14 with 779 views | Bluefish |
| Is this now our strongest side? on 11:36 - Jan 14 by Superfrans |
I've been less impressed with Wilson in recent weeks. He was excellent earlier in the season, before signing his new contract. But less so since November... |
He wasn't excellent at all I have no idea why people were saying that. He has always been limited cheap cover | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
