Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) 20:43 - Mar 7 with 478 views | noggin | | |
| | |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:44 - Mar 7 with 472 views | pointofblue | Jagger? Hucknall? Avory? | |
| |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:44 - Mar 7 with 472 views | artsbossbeard | Me, it's inescapable stuff, in fairness. | |
| Please note: prior to hitting the post button, I've double checked for anything that could be construed as "Anti Semitic" and to the best of my knowledge it isn't. Anything deemed to be of a Xenophobic nature is therefore purely accidental or down to your own misconstruing. | Poll: | Raining in IP8 - shall I get the washing in? |
| |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:47 - Mar 7 with 450 views | noggin |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:44 - Mar 7 by artsbossbeard | Me, it's inescapable stuff, in fairness. |
It was sh1t under Mick though. Get over it. | |
| |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:47 - Mar 7 with 444 views | Warkystache |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:44 - Mar 7 by artsbossbeard | Me, it's inescapable stuff, in fairness. |
I called Judge a useless Mick a few times. I'm not even sure he is, either. Did he play for ROI? | |
| |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:48 - Mar 7 with 437 views | jas0999 | No. Neither do the 10k or so who walked away under his later year management. | | | |
Anyone mentioned Mick today? (n/t) on 20:48 - Mar 7 with 437 views | jeera | Are you taking the mick? | |
| |
| |