By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I don’t like how it’s been cropped as like that does look bad, but the cartoonist, I presume deliberately, included Johnson in full which somewhat changes it
I personally would say it is crass, but not sure why it is racist
tut tut. How did you think your selective editing was not going to be exposed. pic.twitter.com/EQZliFYjRE
— EllyDavis 🇬🇧 🔶 (@EllyDavis) March 8, 2020
No! The context is that they think she evil and If my thinking is right, the racist part is that the cow is sacred in her religion but It wasn’t probably even thought of by the cartoonist so how can it be racist?
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:28 - Mar 9 by itfcjoe
I don’t like how it’s been cropped as like that does look bad, but the cartoonist, I presume deliberately, included Johnson in full which somewhat changes it
I personally would say it is crass, but not sure why it is racist
tut tut. How did you think your selective editing was not going to be exposed. pic.twitter.com/EQZliFYjRE
— EllyDavis 🇬🇧 🔶 (@EllyDavis) March 8, 2020
Oh Boris is a bull too....shame!
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:29 - Mar 9 by stickymockwell
No! The context is that they think she evil and If my thinking is right, the racist part is that the cow is sacred in her religion but It wasn’t probably even thought of by the cartoonist so how can it be racist?
Steve Bell has form for racist cartoons so to say that her religion didn’t come into his thinking is naive.
I don’t see any difference between this portrayal of Hindi woman and that of Serena Williams last year.
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:28 - Mar 9 by itfcjoe
I don’t like how it’s been cropped as like that does look bad, but the cartoonist, I presume deliberately, included Johnson in full which somewhat changes it
I personally would say it is crass, but not sure why it is racist
tut tut. How did you think your selective editing was not going to be exposed. pic.twitter.com/EQZliFYjRE
— EllyDavis 🇬🇧 🔶 (@EllyDavis) March 8, 2020
If a cartoonist drew Diane Abbott as a monkey but also included Corbyn portrayed in the same way next to her, would that change it?
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:40 - Mar 9 by GlasgowBlue
A bull is sacred in Priti Patel’s religion. Bell is not a stupid man.
What was your view of the Serena Williams cartoon?
[Post edited 9 Mar 2020 7:41]
That clearly also drew on racist tropes. Are Asian people ever referred to as bulls as a way of demeaning them? Are they frequently portrayed as bulls as a means of dehumanising them? I'm not aware that they are.
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:43 - Mar 9 by Herbivore
That clearly also drew on racist tropes. Are Asian people ever referred to as bulls as a way of demeaning them? Are they frequently portrayed as bulls as a means of dehumanising them? I'm not aware that they are.
It would be offensive to portray a Jew or a Muslim as a pig. Portraying a Hindi as a cow/bull applies equally imo.
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:43 - Mar 9 by Herbivore
That clearly also drew on racist tropes. Are Asian people ever referred to as bulls as a way of demeaning them? Are they frequently portrayed as bulls as a means of dehumanising them? I'm not aware that they are.
Whilst this is a reply to you, it’s a request to the wider board community, please don’t feed the monkey.
If he drew Patel as a monkey it would change things....epic fail GB.
The British Tamil Conservatives added: ‘This cartoon is offensive on every level. — It’s anti-Hindu. It portrays the Home Secretary, of Hindu origin as a cow. A sacred symbol for Hindus. — Its racist and — misogynist. It’s plainly unacceptable! It may constitute a hate crime.’
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:55 - Mar 9 by GlasgowBlue
The British Tamil Conservatives added: ‘This cartoon is offensive on every level. — It’s anti-Hindu. It portrays the Home Secretary, of Hindu origin as a cow. A sacred symbol for Hindus. — Its racist and — misogynist. It’s plainly unacceptable! It may constitute a hate crime.’
Which....
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:55 - Mar 9 by GlasgowBlue
The British Tamil Conservatives added: ‘This cartoon is offensive on every level. — It’s anti-Hindu. It portrays the Home Secretary, of Hindu origin as a cow. A sacred symbol for Hindus. — Its racist and — misogynist. It’s plainly unacceptable! It may constitute a hate crime.’
....makes them wrong....
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:55 - Mar 9 by GlasgowBlue
The British Tamil Conservatives added: ‘This cartoon is offensive on every level. — It’s anti-Hindu. It portrays the Home Secretary, of Hindu origin as a cow. A sacred symbol for Hindus. — Its racist and — misogynist. It’s plainly unacceptable! It may constitute a hate crime.’
...too!
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Is this cartoon racist? on 07:50 - Mar 9 by GlasgowBlue
[Post edited 9 Mar 2020 8:01]
A little ironic.
You might want to leave a little longer for these sort of retorts. It might otherwise give the impression that you’ve prepared them in advance, which isn’t a great look.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
