Forum | This might be of interest - on the assumptions that go into models of diseases by Steve_M

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

This might be of interest - on the assumptions that go into models of diseases 12:26 - Apr 1 with 349 views

Why it's hard to get right and how changing one or two variables can have a big impact.

https://unherd.com/2020/04/how-likely-are-you-to-die-of-coronavirus/?=frlh

Poll:	When are the squad numbers out?
Blog:	Cycle of Hurt

This might be of interest - on the assumptions that go into models of diseases on 12:32 - Apr 1 with 314 views

Ewan_Oozami

"Professor Jason Oke"

This is not a day to be posting stuff from people with a name like his, no matter how serious it is!

	Just one small problem; sell their houses to who, Ben? Fcking Aquaman?
Poll:	What else could go on top of the cake apart from icing and a cherry?

This might be of interest - on the assumptions that go into models of diseases on 13:33 - Apr 1 with 282 views

Bluesquid

An interesting article and also interesting is that Our World in Data (OWID) who are mentioned in the article had stopped relying on World Health Organization (WHO) data for its models, citing errors and other factors.

"Since March 18 it became unfortunately impossible to rely on the WHO data to understand how the pandemic is developing over time. With Situation Report 58 the WHO shifted the reporting cutoff time from 0900 CET to 0000 CET. This means that comparability is compromised because there is an overlap between these two WHO data publications (Situation Reports 57 and 58)."

"Additionally we found many errors in the data published by the WHO when we went through all the daily Situation Reports. We immediately notified the WHO and are in close contact with the WHO’s team to correct the errors that we pointed out to them."

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread