| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 19:20 - Jun 3 with 1139 views | GeoffSentence |
I don't see the problem here. His father may have built it without planning permission out of instinvtive concern for his son's living arrangements when oop North. The potential council tax avoidance would have simply been an oversight. It's what any parent would do for their child. In no way do they deserve to be sanctioned for it. |  |
|  |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 19:25 - Jun 3 with 1133 views | NBVJohn |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 19:20 - Jun 3 by GeoffSentence |
I don't see the problem here. His father may have built it without planning permission out of instinvtive concern for his son's living arrangements when oop North. The potential council tax avoidance would have simply been an oversight. It's what any parent would do for their child. In no way do they deserve to be sanctioned for it. |
.....and I’m sure Boris would go on record as fully endorsing this, now it’s time to move on...... |  | | |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 21:31 - Jun 3 with 1068 views | Basuco |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 19:25 - Jun 3 by NBVJohn |
.....and I’m sure Boris would go on record as fully endorsing this, now it’s time to move on...... |
It wouldn't surprise me if the "cottage" is not a cottage at all and not habitable for a family, so no planning breach and his family stayed in the main house with his parents. It will be interesting to see what the planning inspector finds when he goes to look at the property. |  | | |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 21:32 - Jun 3 with 1064 views | factual_blue |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 19:20 - Jun 3 by GeoffSentence |
I don't see the problem here. His father may have built it without planning permission out of instinvtive concern for his son's living arrangements when oop North. The potential council tax avoidance would have simply been an oversight. It's what any parent would do for their child. In no way do they deserve to be sanctioned for it. |
I'll put you down for second go on the bulldozer then shall I? |  |
| |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 00:08 - Jun 4 with 1005 views | Swansea_Blue |
Yeah, but what about Stephen Kinnock eh? |  |
| |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 01:01 - Jun 4 with 987 views | Rocky |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 19:25 - Jun 3 by NBVJohn |
.....and I’m sure Boris would go on record as fully endorsing this, now it’s time to move on...... |
"Let's get Cummings done." |  | | |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 08:52 - Jun 4 with 901 views | EdwardStone |
It is probably safe from demolition
If the building was constructed more than 10 years ago it is allowed to stay
If it was turned from a swimming pool into a residence more than 10 years ago, it will be allowed to continue as such
If it was converted to residential use less than 4 years ago it would be safe from enforcement, but only if it was someone's sole and permanent residence
The enforcement process might just be to insist that it is turned back into it's original use as a swimming pool
Or the Local Planning Authority might just issue a Certificate of Lawfulness, they have a lot of scope for manoeuvre in these types of case
So, hold back on hiring the bulldozer for a while |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 09:10 - Jun 4 with 880 views | Keno |
Sure the bulldozer will do the job?
Dynamite anyone? |  |
| |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 09:10 - Jun 4 with 880 views | GeoffSentence |
If he really was smart you would have thought he would have identified the planning permission issue as a risk to his story and adapted his story accordingly.
Oooh, I've had a thought. Perhaps he isn't as smart as he thinks he is. | |
| |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 09:11 - Jun 4 with 879 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Anybody want first go on the bulldozer? on 09:10 - Jun 4 by Keno |
Sure the bulldozer will do the job?
Dynamite anyone? |
Surely just hand it over to immigrants in need of housing? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
