| The new norm appears to be 10:57 - Jun 19 with 3679 views | Bluefish |
anti anti racism
What a world 🌎 |  |
| |  |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:56 - Jun 19 with 620 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:52 - Jun 19 by sparks |
You called me "Stephen Yaxley-Lennon" and then went on to make general accusations that people were playing down racism when they were plainly not doing anything of the sort... |
The punishment was over the top but we are not playing it down.....OK then
The SYL was as tongue in cheek as a comment can clearly get but i am sorry if you didn't take it that way. For the recofd here I don't actually think you are him but I do think he would have shared your view on this particular incident. This does not mean I believe that you share all views | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:56 - Jun 19 with 621 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:45 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
you keep saying gdpr. Do you understand that gdpr is about protected personal information and none was used. Social media policy is highly probable because it is such a catch all policy but to keep quoting gdpr shows that you don't understand it |
I gave GDPR training at my last place of employment mate, I'm well versed.
There are various control measures put in place to avoid potential GDPR breaches, these include things such as social media policy which by your own admission you almost certainly broke. Due to being a trainer and GDPR being a large part of my workload I tend to look at potential breaches/near misses just as seriously as breaches, that's how I maintain a high standard of work.
I've previously used a green, amber, red style chart of potential breaches and your comments would have been well within the amber zone.
If your post had happened and been reported to my place of work you would have been written up for a "near miss" and face a disciplinary.
You're obviously aware it's not the way a School governor should be conducting himself in public, hence requesting the post to be removed.
Similarly, I'm sure you'll be aware of the huge ramifications of any potential breach, again I use the word potential, as you are correct to highlight that no breach had yet taken place. [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 11:59]
|  | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:58 - Jun 19 with 605 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:56 - Jun 19 by Libero |
I gave GDPR training at my last place of employment mate, I'm well versed.
There are various control measures put in place to avoid potential GDPR breaches, these include things such as social media policy which by your own admission you almost certainly broke. Due to being a trainer and GDPR being a large part of my workload I tend to look at potential breaches/near misses just as seriously as breaches, that's how I maintain a high standard of work.
I've previously used a green, amber, red style chart of potential breaches and your comments would have been well within the amber zone.
If your post had happened and been reported to my place of work you would have been written up for a "near miss" and face a disciplinary.
You're obviously aware it's not the way a School governor should be conducting himself in public, hence requesting the post to be removed.
Similarly, I'm sure you'll be aware of the huge ramifications of any potential breach, again I use the word potential, as you are correct to highlight that no breach had yet taken place. [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 11:59]
|
I'm dizzy after that | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:00 - Jun 19 with 592 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:58 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
I'm dizzy after that |
If you or any one at your School require further GDPR or Safeguarding refreshers I'm available at a very reasonable rate, it appears there's a potential gap in the governors training. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:02 - Jun 19 with 585 views | sparks |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:56 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
The punishment was over the top but we are not playing it down.....OK then
The SYL was as tongue in cheek as a comment can clearly get but i am sorry if you didn't take it that way. For the recofd here I don't actually think you are him but I do think he would have shared your view on this particular incident. This does not mean I believe that you share all views |
A tongue in cheek comment. Comparing someone to an overt racist thug?
Perhaps the kid's comment was tongue in cheek. I am sorry if people didnt take it that way. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:02 - Jun 19 with 580 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:00 - Jun 19 by Libero |
If you or any one at your School require further GDPR or Safeguarding refreshers I'm available at a very reasonable rate, it appears there's a potential gap in the governors training. |
to be fair it was wooly enough to be perfect for training and guidance in the education system | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:03 - Jun 19 with 572 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:02 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
to be fair it was wooly enough to be perfect for training and guidance in the education system |
Oh dear. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:03 - Jun 19 with 570 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:02 - Jun 19 by sparks |
A tongue in cheek comment. Comparing someone to an overt racist thug?
Perhaps the kid's comment was tongue in cheek. I am sorry if people didnt take it that way. |
spectacular stuff
At least you aren't playing it down | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The new norm appears to be on 12:11 - Jun 19 with 534 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:44 - Jun 19 by GlasgowBlue |
Who did this? |
I didn't see any evidence of it. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:11 - Jun 19 with 535 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:56 - Jun 19 by Libero |
I gave GDPR training at my last place of employment mate, I'm well versed.
There are various control measures put in place to avoid potential GDPR breaches, these include things such as social media policy which by your own admission you almost certainly broke. Due to being a trainer and GDPR being a large part of my workload I tend to look at potential breaches/near misses just as seriously as breaches, that's how I maintain a high standard of work.
I've previously used a green, amber, red style chart of potential breaches and your comments would have been well within the amber zone.
If your post had happened and been reported to my place of work you would have been written up for a "near miss" and face a disciplinary.
You're obviously aware it's not the way a School governor should be conducting himself in public, hence requesting the post to be removed.
Similarly, I'm sure you'll be aware of the huge ramifications of any potential breach, again I use the word potential, as you are correct to highlight that no breach had yet taken place. [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 11:59]
|
You are both right, GDPR comes in regarding BF's access to the source of the data, ie, on which system was the data stored and how secure it was, as a Governor I suspect that was covered as that would have been in the agreement signed when BF became a Governor, but as for sharing that data publicy himself, that's where the Social Media Policy kicks in.
Don't forget, the GDPR rules apply to TWTD as well, so our information needs to be kept secure, and when we start sharing other poster's details, Phil must be tearing out what little hair he has left.
My golden rule, don't post publicly what you wouldn't post on your own company's network, and if in doubt, don't post at all.. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:12 - Jun 19 with 513 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:11 - Jun 19 by Ewan_Oozami |
You are both right, GDPR comes in regarding BF's access to the source of the data, ie, on which system was the data stored and how secure it was, as a Governor I suspect that was covered as that would have been in the agreement signed when BF became a Governor, but as for sharing that data publicy himself, that's where the Social Media Policy kicks in.
Don't forget, the GDPR rules apply to TWTD as well, so our information needs to be kept secure, and when we start sharing other poster's details, Phil must be tearing out what little hair he has left.
My golden rule, don't post publicly what you wouldn't post on your own company's network, and if in doubt, don't post at all.. |
I needed someone else to help with the re-training at Blubbers School, you've got the gig. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:12 - Jun 19 with 514 views | sparks |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:03 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
spectacular stuff
At least you aren't playing it down |
You are not seriously saying that you don't see what I did there?
  | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:13 - Jun 19 with 512 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:11 - Jun 19 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I didn't see any evidence of it. |
Yeah pretty hard to see the thread that is still on the 1st page of the board | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:23 - Jun 19 with 485 views | PhilTWTD |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:13 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
Yeah pretty hard to see the thread that is still on the 1st page of the board |
To be fair, I can't see it. I'll remove it and have a word if you report the relevant posts. Really not playing by the rules to do that. |  | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:26 - Jun 19 with 473 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:23 - Jun 19 by PhilTWTD |
To be fair, I can't see it. I'll remove it and have a word if you report the relevant posts. Really not playing by the rules to do that. |
snitches get stitches ðŸ˜
Can't pull the wbole thread it has wonderful examples of people being massively wrong about PRP
https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/451547/page:4/#92
[Post edited 19 Jun 2020 12:27]
| |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:28 - Jun 19 with 451 views | Swansea_Blue |
| The new norm appears to be on 11:52 - Jun 19 by sparks |
You called me "Stephen Yaxley-Lennon" and then went on to make general accusations that people were playing down racism when they were plainly not doing anything of the sort... |
Do you prefer to go by your moniker Tommy Robinson?
*runs away*
Sorry, too good a cross not to tap in, and obviously in jest  |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:29 - Jun 19 with 447 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:13 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
Yeah pretty hard to see the thread that is still on the 1st page of the board |
Cant see it. | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:33 - Jun 19 with 441 views | Pinewoodblue |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:02 - Jun 19 by sparks |
A tongue in cheek comment. Comparing someone to an overt racist thug?
Perhaps the kid's comment was tongue in cheek. I am sorry if people didnt take it that way. |
Fortunately TWTD doesn’t have an all covering zero tolerance policy but relies on a common sense approach by contributors. Hence Bluefish rightly asked for his post to be removed, sadly he spoilt it by starting this thread. |  |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:37 - Jun 19 with 419 views | PhilTWTD |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:26 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
snitches get stitches ðŸ˜
Can't pull the wbole thread it has wonderful examples of people being massively wrong about PRP
https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/451547/page:4/#92
[Post edited 19 Jun 2020 12:27]
|
OK, I'll leave it and it doesn't appear to be anything particularly sinister or unpleasant - unlike some previous incidents along these lines including two which ended up being police matters - just a nosiness as far as I can see. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:39 - Jun 19 with 399 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:37 - Jun 19 by PhilTWTD |
OK, I'll leave it and it doesn't appear to be anything particularly sinister or unpleasant - unlike some previous incidents along these lines including two which ended up being police matters - just a nosiness as far as I can see. |
Nothing sinister? I didn't report it but that is a strange take. They are sad fooks but they were clearly trying to bully or intimidate, they didn't do a very good job of it but it was obviously the intention. | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:47 - Jun 19 with 376 views | PhilTWTD |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:39 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
Nothing sinister? I didn't report it but that is a strange take. They are sad fooks but they were clearly trying to bully or intimidate, they didn't do a very good job of it but it was obviously the intention. |
Didn't strike me as quite like that, even if I can see why you'd be uncomfortable. Don't think it's something I'd particularly like to see become a regular occurrence. | | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:51 - Jun 19 with 366 views | Bluefish |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:47 - Jun 19 by PhilTWTD |
Didn't strike me as quite like that, even if I can see why you'd be uncomfortable. Don't think it's something I'd particularly like to see become a regular occurrence. |
3 posters that all have exception with me gleefully pasing around a photo of me. As I said I'm not particularly bothered (more confused by it) but there was no doubt whatsoever what they were up to. They were literally doing it in a thread I was in amongst themselves | |
| |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:57 - Jun 19 with 344 views | Libero |
| The new norm appears to be on 12:51 - Jun 19 by Bluefish |
3 posters that all have exception with me gleefully pasing around a photo of me. As I said I'm not particularly bothered (more confused by it) but there was no doubt whatsoever what they were up to. They were literally doing it in a thread I was in amongst themselves |
Judging by the silly post that could have cost you your role as governor and now the revelation that strangers have managed to track you down and share photos of you online It's probably time you reviewed your security settings before things get out of hand for you.
Most Schools set out in their policy that you're to have all personal social media set to private if you are an employee/governor/etc.
Maybe it's also time to consider if being quite so outspoken and provocative online is worth jeopardising elements of your "real" life. [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 13:03]
| | | |
| The new norm appears to be on 13:01 - Jun 19 with 337 views | Herbivore |
So let me get this straight, Blubbers asked for a thread to be removed but has then decided to start a thread about the thread he asked to be removed? [Post edited 19 Jun 2020 13:11]
|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
