| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) 13:10 - Sep 15 with 4644 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
|  |
| |  |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:10 - Sep 15 with 3110 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
| |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:13 - Sep 15 with 3069 views | Metal_Hacker |
If we lose one I can live with it to be fair , lose both and I'd be pretty upset |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:13 - Sep 15 with 3069 views | Warkystache |
Back in League One next season then...... |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:16 - Sep 15 with 3035 views | Herbivore |
Don't know how legit that is but at that price I'd probably sell. I rate Jackson and think he has the potential to be a very effective right sided forward in our 4-3-3 but Lambert clearly doesn't see it that way. Is Jackson worth more to us than £2.5m as a central striker in a 4-3-3? Very doubtful. Pocket the money and use what little budget we have left to sign someone more suited to the central role, even if only on loan. |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:17 - Sep 15 with 3022 views | Chrisd |
£2.5m is a decent return for us on a player many thought was too pricey at £1.6m. Disappointing to see him go, if the story is true, but it seems once PL has made his mind up he's not one for turning. |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:17 - Sep 15 with 3015 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
I actually rate him more than most but it’s evident that he doesn’t really fit into what Lambert wants us to do. So that’s great news if true |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:21 - Sep 15 with 2956 views | gordon |
Think he's decent enough too but that's a reasonable price, and turning a profit on a Paul Hurst signing is not to be sniffed at. |  | | |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:23 - Sep 15 with 2931 views | BiGDonnie |
I'm starting the motor up now, where does Kayden need picking up from? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:23 - Sep 15 with 2932 views | J2BLUE |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:17 - Sep 15 by Chrisd |
£2.5m is a decent return for us on a player many thought was too pricey at £1.6m. Disappointing to see him go, if the story is true, but it seems once PL has made his mind up he's not one for turning. |
This is why Evans' lack of investment in the Championship was so baffling. Fee inflation means if even one signing does half decent they'll likely go for a lot more.
All too late now. |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 with 2817 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Yes please!!
But cannot believe that story is true, £2.5m?! Really?! |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 with 2817 views | tractordownsouth |
Absolutely no point in selling him. Whilst we have a technically gifted team, we are desperately lacking pace and Jackson would be well suited to playing wide in the front 3. Besides, with the salary cap we can’t get anyone better in anyway.
£2.5m is good money but not if we can’t use it properly |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:35 - Sep 15 with 2785 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 by tractordownsouth |
Absolutely no point in selling him. Whilst we have a technically gifted team, we are desperately lacking pace and Jackson would be well suited to playing wide in the front 3. Besides, with the salary cap we can’t get anyone better in anyway.
£2.5m is good money but not if we can’t use it properly |
The salary cap doesn't prevent us going and getting the best 19/20 year old from League 1 / 2.
That should be our next move. |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:36 - Sep 15 with 2785 views | StokieBlue |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 by Wallingford_Boy |
Yes please!!
But cannot believe that story is true, £2.5m?! Really?! |
Jackson has consistently been one of our best players last season.
Baffling posts from you today. First you think the match against Fulham is important so Norwood shouldn't play and then you posted in the news comments that Jackson is behind Drinan in the pecking order.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:36 - Sep 15 with 2782 views | ITFC_96 |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:35 - Sep 15 by Marshalls_Mullet |
The salary cap doesn't prevent us going and getting the best 19/20 year old from League 1 / 2.
That should be our next move. |
Why would we buy new 19/20 year olds when we are already trying to send them out on loan? | | | |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:36 - Sep 15 with 2777 views | PositivelyPortman |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 by Wallingford_Boy |
Yes please!!
But cannot believe that story is true, £2.5m?! Really?! |
You and Default are crazy. He was joint leading scorer for us last season, and you know full well he’ll be replaced by a has been crock on loan. Some people.  |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:37 - Sep 15 with 2759 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 by tractordownsouth |
Absolutely no point in selling him. Whilst we have a technically gifted team, we are desperately lacking pace and Jackson would be well suited to playing wide in the front 3. Besides, with the salary cap we can’t get anyone better in anyway.
£2.5m is good money but not if we can’t use it properly |
Absolutely correct but if his manager doesn't rate him in that position ..then surely we sell ? | |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:40 - Sep 15 with 2718 views | BiGDonnie |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 by tractordownsouth |
Absolutely no point in selling him. Whilst we have a technically gifted team, we are desperately lacking pace and Jackson would be well suited to playing wide in the front 3. Besides, with the salary cap we can’t get anyone better in anyway.
£2.5m is good money but not if we can’t use it properly |
Not sure if we've seen the same Jackson play because the one I've seen would be a shockingly bad winger with his touch, reading of the game and final product. One of the worst first touches I've ever seen on a professional football pitch.
£2.5m is quality business. [Post edited 15 Sep 2020 13:52]
| |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:40 - Sep 15 with 2709 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:36 - Sep 15 by ITFC_96 |
Why would we buy new 19/20 year olds when we are already trying to send them out on loan? |
The 19/20 year olds eyed for loans are midfielders and we have an over loaded midfield.
Buying the highly rated 19/20 year olds that are ready for first team action in areas we were in need is a sensible model. | |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:42 - Sep 15 with 2679 views | ITFC_96 |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:40 - Sep 15 by Marshalls_Mullet |
The 19/20 year olds eyed for loans are midfielders and we have an over loaded midfield.
Buying the highly rated 19/20 year olds that are ready for first team action in areas we were in need is a sensible model. |
The squad is overloaded in every position except defence... | | | |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:43 - Sep 15 with 2667 views | MonkeyAlan |
Sell sell sell. I'd snap their hands off if they are that desperate to pay that sort of money for him. He isn't worth a pickled egg and a bag of crisps to be honest. |  | | |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:46 - Sep 15 with 2640 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:42 - Sep 15 by ITFC_96 |
The squad is overloaded in every position except defence... |
I wouldn't say we were over loaded up front to be fair :
Hawkins (target man / not prolific goal scorer really)
Norwood (jury is out)
Drinan (unproven)
Jackson (seemingly wants away) | |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:46 - Sep 15 with 2642 views | bournemouthblue |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:33 - Sep 15 by tractordownsouth |
Absolutely no point in selling him. Whilst we have a technically gifted team, we are desperately lacking pace and Jackson would be well suited to playing wide in the front 3. Besides, with the salary cap we can’t get anyone better in anyway.
£2.5m is good money but not if we can’t use it properly |
A lack of pace was evident on Saturday
But then again Otobor is available at the end of September on a free, if we were to sell Jackson and replace him with someone like that, we could do far worse? |  |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:47 - Sep 15 with 2626 views | BiGDonnie |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:36 - Sep 15 by PositivelyPortman |
You and Default are crazy. He was joint leading scorer for us last season, and you know full well he’ll be replaced by a has been crock on loan. Some people. |
£2.5m for a striker who couldn't control a bad of sand...
Deal. | |
| |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:52 - Sep 15 with 2562 views | MonkeyAlan |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:46 - Sep 15 by Metal_Hacker |
I wouldn't say we were over loaded up front to be fair :
Hawkins (target man / not prolific goal scorer really)
Norwood (jury is out)
Drinan (unproven)
Jackson (seemingly wants away) |
Sears is a striker. People forget that. He is wasted out wide. Would score a lot more if he actually got to play in his preferred position. Has never had a real run through the middle. And won't with Lambert's preferred system | | | |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:55 - Sep 15 with 2533 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Jackson £2.5m to Birmingham (n/t) on 13:52 - Sep 15 by MonkeyAlan |
Sears is a striker. People forget that. He is wasted out wide. Would score a lot more if he actually got to play in his preferred position. Has never had a real run through the middle. And won't with Lambert's preferred system |
Not so sure but seems he's being played out wide anyway.I don't doubt his goal scoring ability but I think he'd get more cutting on from the left that up top
Would Sears be able to battle against some of the lumps we sit sat at the back in this league ? I'm skeptical to be fair | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
