| Surprised 11:44 - Oct 4 with 1554 views | portmanroadblue |
No one has mentioned the possible sending off of the MK goalscorer?
Also, how poor the ref was, couple of times we had good tackles pulled up in good positions.
Overall, felt a lot of town players were under par yesterday, Holy, woeful with crosses, Chambers seemed to bottle it against Harvie after the of the ball incident, midfield went missing, poor distribution on numerous occassions, no real urgency or movement from Edwards or Sears when we won the ball back unexpectantly and injuries to Ward and Downes didnt help.
Only real standouts for me was Toto and Hawkins. |  | | |  |
| Surprised on 12:08 - Oct 4 with 1092 views | BrixtonBlue |
I did.
My position is if something is bad enough that it's worthy of a yellow - but it happens in an off-the-ball incident - then it must be pretty close to a red. I also pithily said that you could bet your bottom dollar it would've been red if it was the other way round, sod's law and all that.
The commentators were wondering if it should've been a red too.
Hard to say without seeing it but the chances must've been very high. |  |
| |
| Surprised on 12:25 - Oct 4 with 1060 views | portmanroadblue |
| Surprised on 12:08 - Oct 4 by BrixtonBlue |
I did.
My position is if something is bad enough that it's worthy of a yellow - but it happens in an off-the-ball incident - then it must be pretty close to a red. I also pithily said that you could bet your bottom dollar it would've been red if it was the other way round, sod's law and all that.
The commentators were wondering if it should've been a red too.
Hard to say without seeing it but the chances must've been very high. |
Sorry, must have missed your comment, I think the 4th official brought it to the refs attention, but as you say, if it warrented a card, it had to be red. | | | |
| Surprised on 12:34 - Oct 4 with 1038 views | ArnieM |
.....perhaps that's because a lot of Town fans only want to criticize anything ITFC? |  |
| |
| Surprised on 12:39 - Oct 4 with 1033 views | portmanroadblue |
| Surprised on 12:34 - Oct 4 by ArnieM |
.....perhaps that's because a lot of Town fans only want to criticize anything ITFC? |
Sad, but true. | | | |
| Surprised on 13:07 - Oct 4 with 987 views | Wickets |
Quite strange the comments from the MK Commentators thought it could have been a Red,or so i'm told, Suffolk missed it and said Chambo went down unchallenged at first ! |  | | |
| Surprised on 13:13 - Oct 4 with 986 views | PhilTWTD |
| Surprised on 12:25 - Oct 4 by portmanroadblue |
Sorry, must have missed your comment, I think the 4th official brought it to the refs attention, but as you say, if it warrented a card, it had to be red. |
The whole incident was hopelessly refereed. I saw Harvie kick Chambers right in front of the dugouts. Referee let play carry on for a minute or so, Nsiala tried to put the ball out of play, Lewington deliberately kept it in at which point the ref decided to blow his whistle for the injury, spoke at length to the fourth official, eventually booked Harvie and awarded us a free-kick. Should definitely have been a red. |  | | |
| Surprised (n/t) on 13:15 - Oct 4 with 969 views | longtimefan |
| Surprised on 13:07 - Oct 4 by Wickets |
Quite strange the comments from the MK Commentators thought it could have been a Red,or so i'm told, Suffolk missed it and said Chambo went down unchallenged at first ! |
I was listening to the MK commentary at that point (only found out how to change it later thanks to a post on here) and both commentators were adamant it should have been a red. [Post edited 4 Oct 2020 13:17]
|  | | |
| Surprised on 13:53 - Oct 4 with 919 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
It’s hard to mention or analyse something that no one saw.
No one can say what happened when they didn’t see it on camera. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Surprised on 13:54 - Oct 4 with 917 views | Herbivore |
| Surprised on 12:25 - Oct 4 by portmanroadblue |
Sorry, must have missed your comment, I think the 4th official brought it to the refs attention, but as you say, if it warrented a card, it had to be red. |
Based on what? |  |
| |
| Surprised on 14:02 - Oct 4 with 896 views | SamWhiteUK |
| Surprised on 13:53 - Oct 4 by TheTrueBlue1878 |
It’s hard to mention or analyse something that no one saw.
No one can say what happened when they didn’t see it on camera. |
Phil said he saw it |  | | |
| Surprised (n/t) on 14:03 - Oct 4 with 895 views | Wickets |
| Surprised (n/t) on 13:15 - Oct 4 by longtimefan |
I was listening to the MK commentary at that point (only found out how to change it later thanks to a post on here) and both commentators were adamant it should have been a red. [Post edited 4 Oct 2020 13:17]
|
Yes my son who was also on the MK commentary said the same . | | | |
| Surprised on 14:05 - Oct 4 with 890 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Surprised on 13:54 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Based on what? |
Looks like you've chosen the wrong hill to die on here fella!  | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:07 - Oct 4 with 887 views | PhilTWTD |
| Surprised on 13:54 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Based on what? |
I'm pretty sure deliberately kicking someone off the ball is a red card offence! | | | |
| Surprised on 14:08 - Oct 4 with 881 views | Dubtractor |
| Surprised on 14:02 - Oct 4 by SamWhiteUK |
Phil said he saw it |
I think Phil was probably there, so not relying on the pretty poor camera work. It wasn't shown on camera. |  |
| |
| Surprised on 14:08 - Oct 4 with 876 views | Ely_Blue |
| Surprised on 14:07 - Oct 4 by PhilTWTD |
I'm pretty sure deliberately kicking someone off the ball is a red card offence! |
Ouch!
As the kids would say “you just got burned” 🔥🔥 |  |
| |
| Surprised on 14:08 - Oct 4 with 875 views | Herbivore |
| Surprised on 14:07 - Oct 4 by PhilTWTD |
I'm pretty sure deliberately kicking someone off the ball is a red card offence! |
Didn't see your post initially. Fair enough if you saw it and that's what happened, but you had people on here calling it a red without seeing it or hearing from anyone that had seen it. | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:10 - Oct 4 with 865 views | Herbivore |
| Surprised on 14:05 - Oct 4 by BrixtonBlue |
Looks like you've chosen the wrong hill to die on here fella! |
Yeah, this really doesn't prove your point. You said it was a red without having seen it or listening to anyone who had seen it. You didn't even know it was a kick at the time. | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:11 - Oct 4 with 863 views | Ely_Blue |
| Surprised on 14:08 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Didn't see your post initially. Fair enough if you saw it and that's what happened, but you had people on here calling it a red without seeing it or hearing from anyone that had seen it. |
..... [Post edited 4 Oct 2020 14:13]
| |
| |
| Surprised on 14:11 - Oct 4 with 863 views | PhilTWTD |
| Surprised on 14:08 - Oct 4 by Dubtractor |
I think Phil was probably there, so not relying on the pretty poor camera work. It wasn't shown on camera. |
I think only me and the MK Dons commentator seemed to see it as there were a few asking what had happened in the press box. I just happened to catch it. | | | |
| Surprised on 14:11 - Oct 4 with 860 views | Herbivore |
| Surprised on 14:11 - Oct 4 by Ely_Blue |
..... [Post edited 4 Oct 2020 14:13]
|
Great contribution. | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:14 - Oct 4 with 845 views | Ely_Blue |
| Surprised on 14:11 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Great contribution. |
Pot-kettle-black. Oh the irony 😂😂😂 | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:14 - Oct 4 with 840 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Surprised on 14:08 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Didn't see your post initially. Fair enough if you saw it and that's what happened, but you had people on here calling it a red without seeing it or hearing from anyone that had seen it. |
As I said to you yesterday, if something's bad enough that it warrants a yellow (i.e. it's deliberate) and it's also off the ball, then there's a very very high chance it should be a red. I can't really think of why it would be a yellow.
You said my view didn't make any sense and I had "lost my head."
I'm going to sit here smugly while I wait for your contrition | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:15 - Oct 4 with 832 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Surprised on 14:10 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Yeah, this really doesn't prove your point. You said it was a red without having seen it or listening to anyone who had seen it. You didn't even know it was a kick at the time. |
Best to stop digging now champ. | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:21 - Oct 4 with 817 views | Herbivore |
| Surprised on 14:14 - Oct 4 by BrixtonBlue |
As I said to you yesterday, if something's bad enough that it warrants a yellow (i.e. it's deliberate) and it's also off the ball, then there's a very very high chance it should be a red. I can't really think of why it would be a yellow.
You said my view didn't make any sense and I had "lost my head."
I'm going to sit here smugly while I wait for your contrition |
Kicking someone is a red card whether it's off the ball or not. You said it was a red without knowing what happened. That's just silly. If it's as Phil described then it's a red, but you've only just become aware of that information. | |
| |
| Surprised on 14:36 - Oct 4 with 778 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Surprised on 14:21 - Oct 4 by Herbivore |
Kicking someone is a red card whether it's off the ball or not. You said it was a red without knowing what happened. That's just silly. If it's as Phil described then it's a red, but you've only just become aware of that information. |
My point was if it was worthy of a yellow it was worthy of a red, whatever it was. I didn't need to see it to reach that conclusion, and I've been proved right.
What flavour of humble pie would you like? I've got better at cooking since lockdown. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
