"Visual Table" 17:09 - Oct 17 with 6092 views | Kropotkin123 | 16 Ipswich 15 Hull 13 Lincoln 12 Peterborough 11 Sunderland, Plymouth 10 Doncaster, Gillingham 9 Accrington 8 Portsmouth, Wimbledon, Bristol Rovers 7 Crewe, Fleetwood, Charlton 6 Shrewsbury, Swindon, Wigan 5 Milton Keynes 4 Blackpool, Burton, Northampton, Rochdale 3 Oxford ... | |
| | |
"Visual Table" on 20:49 - Oct 17 with 2247 views | Stenvict |
"Visual Table" on 20:27 - Oct 17 by Nthsuffolkblue | Ah, so the table should be altered to reflect points per game. |
The season should just be ended now on PPG | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 22:13 - Oct 17 with 2227 views | Swansea_Blue | Have you got an audible version? | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 23:08 - Oct 17 with 2217 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 20:06 - Oct 17 by jeera | It's rather rude to criticise someone else's efforts don't you think though. No one has to open the thread. |
I appreciate that mate. Although I'd be tempted to down vote my original post, I was questioning the purpose of it when doing it. I'm surprised and interested to see how it has managed to get to a 2nd page. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 23:12 - Oct 17 with 2209 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
"Visual Table" on 23:08 - Oct 17 by Kropotkin123 | I appreciate that mate. Although I'd be tempted to down vote my original post, I was questioning the purpose of it when doing it. I'm surprised and interested to see how it has managed to get to a 2nd page. |
Personally, I appreciated it. I just think most people would like you to be putting a lot more space in after our name at the top. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 23:59 - Oct 17 with 2181 views | hoppy |
"Visual Table" on 23:12 - Oct 17 by Nthsuffolkblue | Personally, I appreciated it. I just think most people would like you to be putting a lot more space in after our name at the top. |
Work in progress... I'm sure it's possible to increase the gap - maybe over the next week? | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 01:05 - Oct 18 with 2155 views | jeera |
"Visual Table" on 23:12 - Oct 17 by Nthsuffolkblue | Personally, I appreciated it. I just think most people would like you to be putting a lot more space in after our name at the top. |
Likewise, I thought it a good idea. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 08:24 - Oct 18 with 2110 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 20:07 - Oct 17 by hoppy | Now there's a challenge... could this get to 10 pages? |
I'm aiming for it to be bigger than the US Election Mega Thread | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 14:41 - Jan 15 with 1997 views | Kropotkin123 | 42 Lincoln City 38 Hull City 35 Portsmouth 33 Doncaster, Peterborough, Accrington, Charlton 32 Ipswich Town 31 Crewe Alexandra 30 Sunderland 29 Fleetwood 28 Oxford Utd 27 Blackpool 26 Gillingham, Plymouth 25 Milton Keynes 24 Shrewsbury 22 Bristol Rovers, Northampton 21 Rochdale, AFC Wimbledon 20 Swindon Town 19 Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
"Visual Table" on 14:43 - Jan 15 with 1989 views | itfcjoe |
"Visual Table" on 14:41 - Jan 15 by Kropotkin123 | 42 Lincoln City 38 Hull City 35 Portsmouth 33 Doncaster, Peterborough, Accrington, Charlton 32 Ipswich Town 31 Crewe Alexandra 30 Sunderland 29 Fleetwood 28 Oxford Utd 27 Blackpool 26 Gillingham, Plymouth 25 Milton Keynes 24 Shrewsbury 22 Bristol Rovers, Northampton 21 Rochdale, AFC Wimbledon 20 Swindon Town 19 Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion |
Doesn't really work with such a discrepancy in games played | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 14:44 - Jan 15 with 1984 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 14:43 - Jan 15 by itfcjoe | Doesn't really work with such a discrepancy in games played |
Yeah, not sure why anyone would bother doing this in the first place, let alone at this particular moment in time. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 15:21 - Jan 15 with 1959 views | bluefunk | wtf does that mean | | | |
"Visual Table" on 15:26 - Jan 15 with 1957 views | Swansea_Blue |
"Visual Table" on 14:43 - Jan 15 by itfcjoe | Doesn't really work with such a discrepancy in games played |
Quite. We've still got to lose our games in hand yet. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 16:40 - Jan 15 with 1925 views | TJS | Adjusted table with all games in hand played at current PPG 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth 42 Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham 28 Plymouth Argyle 28 Bristol Rovers 28 Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale 24 AFC Wimbledon 24 Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town 22 Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion [Post edited 15 Jan 2021 16:42]
| | | |
"Visual Table" on 16:44 - Jan 15 with 1916 views | Keno | I have a question Is it good or bad that we are top? | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:27 - Jan 15 with 1884 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 16:44 - Jan 15 by Keno | I have a question Is it good or bad that we are top? |
Good question. It was good that we were top. It is not so good that we are no longer top. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:29 - Jan 15 with 1879 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 16:40 - Jan 15 by TJS | Adjusted table with all games in hand played at current PPG 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth 42 Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham 28 Plymouth Argyle 28 Bristol Rovers 28 Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale 24 AFC Wimbledon 24 Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town 22 Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion [Post edited 15 Jan 2021 16:42]
|
Adjusted "Visual Table" table with all games in hand played at current PPG 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth, Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham, Plymouth Argyle, Bristol Rovers, Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale, AFC Wimbledon, Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town, Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:34 - Jan 15 with 1866 views | Keno |
"Visual Table" on 17:29 - Jan 15 by Kropotkin123 | Adjusted "Visual Table" table with all games in hand played at current PPG 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth, Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham, Plymouth Argyle, Bristol Rovers, Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale, AFC Wimbledon, Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town, Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion |
Is this like schrodinger's league table? | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:34 - Jan 15 with 1866 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
"Visual Table" on 16:40 - Jan 15 by TJS | Adjusted table with all games in hand played at current PPG 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth 42 Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham 28 Plymouth Argyle 28 Bristol Rovers 28 Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale 24 AFC Wimbledon 24 Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town 22 Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion [Post edited 15 Jan 2021 16:42]
|
And to turn that into the visual version of the original (each point has a separate line so the more space, the bigger the gap: 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham Plymouth Argyle Bristol Rovers Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale AFC Wimbledon Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion (EDIT: Forgot to add the gap above Burton) [Post edited 15 Jan 2021 17:36]
| |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:35 - Jan 15 with 1860 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 15:21 - Jan 15 by bluefunk | wtf does that mean |
17th October called and wants their question back* *Sorry if that was a serious question and not a faux-windup | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:36 - Jan 15 with 1857 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 17:34 - Jan 15 by Nthsuffolkblue | And to turn that into the visual version of the original (each point has a separate line so the more space, the bigger the gap: 46 Lincoln City 45 Accrington Stanley 44 Hull City 42 Portsmouth Doncaster Rovers 40 Peterborough United 39 Ipswich Town 37 Charlton Athletic 36 Sunderland 34 Crewe Alexandra 33 Fleetwood Town 32 Oxford United 31 Blackpool 28 Gillingham Plymouth Argyle Bristol Rovers Shrewsbury Town 27 Milton Keynes Dons 24 Rochdale AFC Wimbledon Northampton Town 22 Swindon Town Wigan Athletic 16 Burton Albion (EDIT: Forgot to add the gap above Burton) [Post edited 15 Jan 2021 17:36]
|
Exactly! | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:39 - Jan 15 with 1854 views | Chrisd |
"Visual Table" on 18:56 - Oct 17 by GeoffSentence | Surprise to see Oxford there given they got to the play offs last year |
Oxford are just starting to get their act together, they've won their last 5 or 6 games in all competitions. They'll be ahead of us in a couple of games after being in the bottom half of the league for most of this season. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:40 - Jan 15 with 1853 views | Keno |
I get it now | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:43 - Jan 15 with 1848 views | Kropotkin123 |
"Visual Table" on 17:34 - Jan 15 by Keno | Is this like schrodinger's league table? |
Up until a point. I believe Schrodinger was proving quantum theory philosophers would never be relevant, but if the league was to end tomorrow, I'm sure even Phil will be quoting this new one in his ppg exposition. | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 17:46 - Jan 15 with 1844 views | jeera |
"Visual Table" on 17:34 - Jan 15 by Keno | Is this like schrodinger's league table? |
Is that us being both relegated and/or promoted at the same time? Until we open the box and realise we've sold a promising young player for peanuts? | |
| |
"Visual Table" on 19:43 - Jan 15 with 1812 views | bluefunk |
"Visual Table" on 17:35 - Jan 15 by Kropotkin123 | 17th October called and wants their question back* *Sorry if that was a serious question and not a faux-windup |
I’m really not clever enough to do attempt a wind up. I’ve read the whole thread now and it appears to be confirming that we aren’t very good. Did I get that right although perhaps the correct response is “pick any date from the last 3 years, they want their comment back” | | | |
| |