McGuinness 15:38 - Oct 20 with 884 views | townman1986 | Any thoughts as a temporary striker by all accounts good in the air | | | | |
McGuinness on 15:45 - Oct 20 with 860 views | StokieBlue | Is that the primary criteria for our central striker? SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
McGuinness on 16:13 - Oct 20 with 800 views | Tractorchef | Funnily enough I was discussing this at half time on Saturday, like you say good in the air, good with the ball at his feet. Seemed a better option than Judge. Though we then came out in the second half and won so maybe, just maybe Lambert is better placed to make these kind of decisions than I am! | | | |
McGuinness on 16:48 - Oct 20 with 733 views | monty_radio |
McGuinness on 16:13 - Oct 20 by Tractorchef | Funnily enough I was discussing this at half time on Saturday, like you say good in the air, good with the ball at his feet. Seemed a better option than Judge. Though we then came out in the second half and won so maybe, just maybe Lambert is better placed to make these kind of decisions than I am! |
It surprises me how seldom managers consider moving certain defenders forward in a crisis when they're perfectly happy to play strikers and central midfielders on the wing, more natural wingers further back and many a full back in the centre. I agree in principle with what Herbie said in an earlier thread re square pegs in round holes, but when needs must why not pitch a ball-playing defender further forward as a hold-up player. Bam Bam did it, Hawkins reportedly can do it - even Micky Stockwell bagged a brace while deployed there. Meanwhile, whatever possessed anybody to think that Judge, notorious for chasing the ball all over the pitch, would stay put as a fulcrum for the front line? - false nine must mean something, but surely some of the potential for the "nine" bit should be in evidence? | |
| |
McGuinness on 17:31 - Oct 20 with 656 views | Pilgrimblue |
McGuinness on 16:48 - Oct 20 by monty_radio | It surprises me how seldom managers consider moving certain defenders forward in a crisis when they're perfectly happy to play strikers and central midfielders on the wing, more natural wingers further back and many a full back in the centre. I agree in principle with what Herbie said in an earlier thread re square pegs in round holes, but when needs must why not pitch a ball-playing defender further forward as a hold-up player. Bam Bam did it, Hawkins reportedly can do it - even Micky Stockwell bagged a brace while deployed there. Meanwhile, whatever possessed anybody to think that Judge, notorious for chasing the ball all over the pitch, would stay put as a fulcrum for the front line? - false nine must mean something, but surely some of the potential for the "nine" bit should be in evidence? |
If Hawkins isn't available then why not move Chambers to lead the attack, I think he's quite enjoy himself! That would mean either Donacian or McGuiness would fill in at RB. | | | |
McGuinness on 17:47 - Oct 20 with 622 views | AlexGreen | To be fair he has made one first team start in his entire career, in the U23s against us in the cup. I'd be wary of playing a19yr old on-loan defender upfront on his own in his first ever league match in his life! If he's played the full 90 and we're chasing a goal in injury time then throw him up top to win the flick-on, but other than that seems almost unfair on him. | |
| |
McGuinness on 17:55 - Oct 20 with 610 views | Wickets |
McGuinness on 15:45 - Oct 20 by StokieBlue | Is that the primary criteria for our central striker? SB |
Maybe not but it is a help ! | | | |
McGuinness on 18:01 - Oct 20 with 588 views | Wickets | Hawkins on the bench tonight . | | | |
McGuinness on 18:32 - Oct 20 with 545 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
McGuinness on 17:47 - Oct 20 by AlexGreen | To be fair he has made one first team start in his entire career, in the U23s against us in the cup. I'd be wary of playing a19yr old on-loan defender upfront on his own in his first ever league match in his life! If he's played the full 90 and we're chasing a goal in injury time then throw him up top to win the flick-on, but other than that seems almost unfair on him. |
That wasn't a first team fixture for him, was it? So the young lad has never played a first team fixture at any level for anyone. | |
| |
| |