Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
FFS 21:01 - Oct 21 with 2777 viewsDarth_Koont


Pronouns: He/Him

0
FFS on 22:46 - Oct 21 with 797 viewsStokieBlue

FFS on 22:36 - Oct 21 by Darth_Koont

I haven’t gone in hard from day 1. I was supportive of him and his pledges.

But yes, I have gone in harder as he’s disappointed me more and more. And realised that his pledges weren’t particularly “pledgy”.


Fair enough, day 1 should probably have read "early on".

You didn't answer the two questions in the post.

SB
0
FFS on 23:14 - Oct 21 with 763 viewsDarth_Koont

FFS on 22:46 - Oct 21 by StokieBlue

Fair enough, day 1 should probably have read "early on".

You didn't answer the two questions in the post.

SB


Obviously we have very different ideas about “leading the debate” but talking about regional inequalities and child poverty is something this opposition should always be doing rather than when it comes up. They should be talking about transformative policies whenever they can. Like the environment, human rights, structural racism, wealth inequality, worker rights, dealing with AI and automation plus much more.

Instead we’ve got Starmer talking about family, nation and opportunity as if we can get back to the good old days of Cameron. Or abstaining on vital questions for some strategic win.

At the same time that’s in a world (with UK politics it’s own little self-regarding world set apart from that) where the big issues are increasingly outflanking traditional politics and especially a safe, comfortable, supposedly grownup centre. But there is no vision there, no solutions, just a desire to keep things roughly as they are and “sensible”.

And that’s why the centre has been complicit in what’s happened in the UK over decades. Because ultimately, ignoring swathes of the population, the regions and many of the pressing social and economic questions serves their interests too.

But sure, let’s keep making the same mistake and getting worse and worse governments. I hope you’re right that this time that it’ll work but I think it’s an even stupider mistake considering Scotland and the traditional Labour support are almost over the horizon. The only way to get them back is to actually address the underlying structural problems that have led to such disillusionment and disenfranchisement.

Pronouns: He/Him

0
FFS on 06:01 - Oct 22 with 706 viewsIPS_wich

You're overlooking the fact that we've established in the last few years that 52% of the voting public are morons. This poll shows that 10% of the morons have either become less moronic or have passed away!!
0
FFS on 07:48 - Oct 22 with 661 viewsgtsb1966

FFS on 06:01 - Oct 22 by IPS_wich

You're overlooking the fact that we've established in the last few years that 52% of the voting public are morons. This poll shows that 10% of the morons have either become less moronic or have passed away!!


I wonder if Gordon is still alive?
0
FFS on 08:31 - Oct 22 with 616 viewspointofblue

FFS on 07:48 - Oct 22 by gtsb1966

I wonder if Gordon is still alive?


Brown? Flash? Thomas the Tank Engine’s friend?

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
FFS on 08:39 - Oct 22 with 611 viewsgtsb1966

FFS on 08:31 - Oct 22 by pointofblue

Brown? Flash? Thomas the Tank Engine’s friend?


0
FFS on 09:52 - Oct 22 with 573 viewsArnoldMoorhen

FFS on 21:59 - Oct 21 by pointofblue

Though to be fair this government is making it very easy for them to do so. For all their many faults it was far harder for Corbyn to point the finger at Cameron and May compared to Starmer v Johnson.


You do know that Corbyn had a General Election against Johnson, right?

And lost it, badly.

I am deeply unhappy with Starmer's bizarre decision to whip Abstentions on the "James Bond can live out Boris Johnson's fantasies" Bill, but we can't change history: Corbyn failed to win against the terminally unrelatable Theresa "running through wheatfields" May, and a bloke who had just shut down Parliament illegally.

Under the current, bent, system with gerrymandered constituencies and the media lined up against him, Corbyn was unelectable. He tried twice. Labour needs to align itself quickly behind Starmer, or they will lose again, against a corrupt and incompetent Government. But Starmer needs to give a vision to, particularly young, Corbyn-friendly activists which will motivate them and give them something to believe in. Just being "dull and competent" won't be enough to unite the Party and give him a chance under our deeply flawed and unfair electoral system.
4
FFS on 11:51 - Oct 22 with 531 viewsDarth_Koont

FFS on 09:52 - Oct 22 by ArnoldMoorhen

You do know that Corbyn had a General Election against Johnson, right?

And lost it, badly.

I am deeply unhappy with Starmer's bizarre decision to whip Abstentions on the "James Bond can live out Boris Johnson's fantasies" Bill, but we can't change history: Corbyn failed to win against the terminally unrelatable Theresa "running through wheatfields" May, and a bloke who had just shut down Parliament illegally.

Under the current, bent, system with gerrymandered constituencies and the media lined up against him, Corbyn was unelectable. He tried twice. Labour needs to align itself quickly behind Starmer, or they will lose again, against a corrupt and incompetent Government. But Starmer needs to give a vision to, particularly young, Corbyn-friendly activists which will motivate them and give them something to believe in. Just being "dull and competent" won't be enough to unite the Party and give him a chance under our deeply flawed and unfair electoral system.


Agree on the whole and certainly with the last part about a vision to motivate and a commitment to unify. That’s where I think he’s been particularly bad and no longer even seems on nodding terms with the genuinely motivating and unifying pledges many took at face value.

But I think the truth re: election performance is somewhat between 2017 and 2019 where the major difference was Brexit as a dominating issue and a ramping up of the attacks on Corbyn.

May was of course an uninspiring opponent and the Tories weren’t as focused without a Cummings-style playbook so we can’t take 2017 as a normal result either. But it did indicate that progressive policies do have traction and can engage and energise voters. That was also shown in polling around policies in 2019 and the breakdown of the age demographics.

That energy and engagement is a feature of politics that the Tories tapped into with Brexit, and it’s a feature that’s here to stay. Here’s a good article about Starmer’s leadership so far and problems with it.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/keir-starmer-not-leader-he-may-soon-lead-u

Oborne’s conclusion is that Starmer is a leader and possible future PM who risks being swept away by the tide of events. I’d go further and say he’ll be swept away electorally by the tide of events until he can start leading the debate and not leaning into Tory and the right-wing press’s own talking points. It’s such a dull, uninspiring and hopeless message that a BLM, a Green Party, the SNP will steal his thunder or even that the Tories just pivot and push “progressive” policies themselves. All the while moving the conversation away from their actual record that they should be skewered by.
[Post edited 22 Oct 2020 11:52]

Pronouns: He/Him

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025