Is this 433? 18:07 - Oct 27 with 1018 views | Bluefish | With a midfield of Dozzell Bishop and Lankester? Against a Steve Evans side?? | |
| | |
Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 with 974 views | PJH | It might be 442 with Sears upfront with Hawkins. Getting closer to our strongest available starting team though I think. | | | |
Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 with 976 views | OsmansCleanSheet | I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle. | | | |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 with 948 views | Ewan_Oozami |
Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by OsmansCleanSheet | I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle. |
433 with either Sears or Edwards dropping back into midfield on the appropriate side if we lose the ball high up the pitch | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 with 946 views | ArnoldMoorhen | There's gonna be some kickin' and a-trippin' and a-fallin' and a-brawlin' goin' on. Someone told me Gillingham is in the deep South. And Evans has always struck me as a redneck type. And face, obviously. | | | |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 with 946 views | itfcjoe | It looks like 4231....could go one of two ways tonight Ball players right through the spine, but.... | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:12 - Oct 27 with 937 views | pointofblue |
Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by OsmansCleanSheet | I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle. |
Though, as I said elsewhere, we have no strength available to us in the middle of the park anyway unless we try McGavin. I’m still having flashbacks to the Fleetwood match regarding him. | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:12 - Oct 27 with 929 views | Chrisd |
Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by PJH | It might be 442 with Sears upfront with Hawkins. Getting closer to our strongest available starting team though I think. |
I’m still thinking 4-3-3 with Lankester playing the advanced role in midfield and Sears and Edwards in the attacking wide roles. Didn’t Lankester play this role in the EFL Trophy fixture against the Gills? | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:14 - Oct 27 with 909 views | CokeIsKey |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by itfcjoe | It looks like 4231....could go one of two ways tonight Ball players right through the spine, but.... |
Can Bishop play as a defensive midfielder? would've been ok with Huws there but those two against a strong Gillingham team is slightly concerning... | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Is this 433? on 18:15 - Oct 27 with 889 views | Bluefish |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by itfcjoe | It looks like 4231....could go one of two ways tonight Ball players right through the spine, but.... |
4231 is effectively 433 or 451 however you want to call it Agree we have ball players but we could be massively out muscled Sadly I only get to see 1st half tonight because it could be beautiful if we get the ball down and play. We have to not just be content with passing triangles though, we need goals. I still don't link the wide options are capable of linking the play well enough, theybare both the sort that need to be played in opposed to the sort to link like Lankester and Bishop do | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:15 - Oct 27 with 875 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by Ewan_Oozami | 433 with either Sears or Edwards dropping back into midfield on the appropriate side if we lose the ball high up the pitch |
The 4-3-3 is very close to being 4-5-1 and Sears and Edwards have the work rate to make it something between those whilst still having attacking intent. | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:17 - Oct 27 with 859 views | positivity | looks more like a diamond with lankester at the tip | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:18 - Oct 27 with 847 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by OsmansCleanSheet | I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle. |
Dozzell isn't incredibly lightweight. He gets stuck in a reasonable amount. He's no Guirane N'Daw, but he isn't that dissimilar from Skuse off the ball, and I think he puts in more challenges. And Bishop can be feisty, too. That said I would have preferred it if Downes had made up an ever-present midfield trio with Dozzell and Bishop, just sods law that when Teddy puts together a run of games Downes gets injured. | | | |
Is this 433? on 18:19 - Oct 27 with 841 views | pointofblue |
Is this 433? on 18:17 - Oct 27 by positivity | looks more like a diamond with lankester at the tip |
I’m not so sure - who else makes up the diamond with Dozzell and Bishop in that scenario? | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:25 - Oct 27 with 785 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by Ewan_Oozami | 433 with either Sears or Edwards dropping back into midfield on the appropriate side if we lose the ball high up the pitch |
That’s the crucial bit, coaches don’t just play 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 they play an attacking and defensive formation. So yes one to drop back into a 4 when we defend in midfield I imagine. | |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:26 - Oct 27 with 764 views | positivity |
Is this 433? on 18:19 - Oct 27 by pointofblue | I’m not so sure - who else makes up the diamond with Dozzell and Bishop in that scenario? |
edwards on the left, bish on the right, but i'm not sure either! [Post edited 27 Oct 2020 18:26]
| |
| |
Is this 433? on 18:27 - Oct 27 with 744 views | IpswichBoyBlue | We ain't got much more than that, so will have to do. | | | |
| |