Quantcast
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Is this 433? 18:07 - Oct 27 with 530 viewsBluefish

With a midfield of Dozzell Bishop and Lankester?


Against a Steve Evans side??

Yet again proved right and has the whole board on strings. Cheers They wished for this and got their way. Every village has an idiot and Suffolk has a lot of villages, Never been wrong, Odious smug little chap
Poll: Who should be the next ITFC boss
Blog: [Blog] Long Live King George

0

Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 with 486 viewsPJH

It might be 442 with Sears upfront with Hawkins.

Getting closer to our strongest available starting team though I think.
0

Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 with 488 viewsOsmansCleanSheet

I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle.
0
Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 with 460 viewsEwan_Oozami

Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by OsmansCleanSheet

I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle.


433 with either Sears or Edwards dropping back into midfield on the appropriate side if we lose the ball high up the pitch

Am viewing TWTD in Table Mode on this browser so apologies if replying to a completely different post to the one I intended. Pronouns: ho/hum
Poll: Does the Forum think little snoozes during the day are acceptable, or not?

0

Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 with 458 viewsArnoldMoorhen

There's gonna be some kickin' and a-trippin' and a-fallin' and a-brawlin' goin' on.


Someone told me Gillingham is in the deep South.

And Evans has always struck me as a redneck type.

And face, obviously.
0

Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 with 458 viewsitfcjoe

It looks like 4231....could go one of two ways tonight

Ball players right through the spine, but....

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
Is this 433? on 18:12 - Oct 27 with 449 viewspointofblue

Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by OsmansCleanSheet

I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle.


Though, as I said elsewhere, we have no strength available to us in the middle of the park anyway unless we try McGavin. I’m still having flashbacks to the Fleetwood match regarding him.

Poll: Which formation should we play moving forward?

0
Is this 433? on 18:12 - Oct 27 with 441 viewsChrisd

Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by PJH

It might be 442 with Sears upfront with Hawkins.

Getting closer to our strongest available starting team though I think.


I’m still thinking 4-3-3 with Lankester playing the advanced role in midfield and Sears and Edwards in the attacking wide roles. Didn’t Lankester play this role in the EFL Trophy fixture against the Gills?

Poll: Where are we going to finish?

0
Is this 433? on 18:14 - Oct 27 with 421 viewsCokeIsKey

Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by itfcjoe

It looks like 4231....could go one of two ways tonight

Ball players right through the spine, but....


Can Bishop play as a defensive midfielder? would've been ok with Huws there but those two against a strong Gillingham team is slightly concerning...

Poll: Should Lambert continue as the Ipswich Town manager?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Is this 433? on 18:15 - Oct 27 with 401 viewsBluefish

Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by itfcjoe

It looks like 4231....could go one of two ways tonight

Ball players right through the spine, but....


4231 is effectively 433 or 451 however you want to call it

Agree we have ball players but we could be massively out muscled

Sadly I only get to see 1st half tonight because it could be beautiful if we get the ball down and play. We have to not just be content with passing triangles though, we need goals.

I still don't link the wide options are capable of linking the play well enough, theybare both the sort that need to be played in opposed to the sort to link like Lankester and Bishop do

Yet again proved right and has the whole board on strings. Cheers They wished for this and got their way. Every village has an idiot and Suffolk has a lot of villages, Never been wrong, Odious smug little chap
Poll: Who should be the next ITFC boss
Blog: [Blog] Long Live King George

0
Is this 433? on 18:15 - Oct 27 with 387 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by Ewan_Oozami

433 with either Sears or Edwards dropping back into midfield on the appropriate side if we lose the ball high up the pitch


The 4-3-3 is very close to being 4-5-1 and Sears and Edwards have the work rate to make it something between those whilst still having attacking intent.

Poll: Who should leave the club?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0

Is this 433? on 18:17 - Oct 27 with 371 viewspositivity

looks more like a diamond with lankester at the tip
0
Is this 433? on 18:18 - Oct 27 with 359 viewsArnoldMoorhen

Is this 433? on 18:10 - Oct 27 by OsmansCleanSheet

I was trying to figure that out. Could be 442 with that line up but Dozzell & Bishop would be incredibly lightweight in the middle.


Dozzell isn't incredibly lightweight. He gets stuck in a reasonable amount. He's no Guirane N'Daw, but he isn't that dissimilar from Skuse off the ball, and I think he puts in more challenges. And Bishop can be feisty, too.

That said I would have preferred it if Downes had made up an ever-present midfield trio with Dozzell and Bishop, just sods law that when Teddy puts together a run of games Downes gets injured.
0
Is this 433? on 18:19 - Oct 27 with 353 viewspointofblue

Is this 433? on 18:17 - Oct 27 by positivity

looks more like a diamond with lankester at the tip


I’m not so sure - who else makes up the diamond with Dozzell and Bishop in that scenario?

Poll: Which formation should we play moving forward?

0
Is this 433? on 18:25 - Oct 27 with 297 viewsWallingford_Boy

Is this 433? on 18:11 - Oct 27 by Ewan_Oozami

433 with either Sears or Edwards dropping back into midfield on the appropriate side if we lose the ball high up the pitch


That’s the crucial bit, coaches don’t just play 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 they play an attacking and defensive formation.

So yes one to drop back into a 4 when we defend in midfield I imagine.

RIP Sir Bobby

0
Is this 433? on 18:26 - Oct 27 with 276 viewspositivity

Is this 433? on 18:19 - Oct 27 by pointofblue

I’m not so sure - who else makes up the diamond with Dozzell and Bishop in that scenario?


edwards on the left, bish on the right, but i'm not sure either!
[Post edited 27 Oct 18:26]
0

Is this 433? on 18:27 - Oct 27 with 256 viewsIpswichBoyBlue

We ain't got much more than that, so will have to do.
0

Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2020