crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" 16:59 - Nov 14 with 3943 views | positivity | when we played them, apparently. now? |  |
| |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:21 - Nov 14 with 1457 views | positivity |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 19:48 - Nov 14 by Nthsuffolkblue | Hold on so our reserves beat a weakened side they put out in the cup? I can only imagine you are referring to Gillingham because we lost to Portsmouth, Fulham and Arsenal kids. Gillingham are 16th in League 1. The other top 6 team we beat last month? Accrington (11th), Blackpool (15th) or Gillingham (16th). I think you need to look at the league table or did we win an U23 game or something? It is the league that matters and the stat is worrying. [Post edited 14 Nov 2020 19:51]
|
gillingham were 6th before we beat them, accrington were 6th before we beat them. now they're 11th with 4 games in hand. play like we did against sunderland without the doz situation and we win more than we lose [Post edited 14 Nov 2020 21:24]
|  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:24 - Nov 14 with 1445 views | PJH |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:19 - Nov 14 by positivity | then played his proper blokes ahead of them? that's the one! |
Yes, I could never understand MM not playing Dozzell and Bishop just because they were injured. |  | |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:25 - Nov 14 with 1440 views | positivity |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:24 - Nov 14 by PJH | Yes, I could never understand MM not playing Dozzell and Bishop just because they were injured. |
doz wasn't injured all the time, he just wasn't a proper bloke, same with bish after he'd recovered. downes wasn't injured, he just was no jonathan douglas, same with the others... [Post edited 14 Nov 2020 21:28]
|  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:33 - Nov 14 with 1433 views | Seablu |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:21 - Nov 14 by positivity | gillingham were 6th before we beat them, accrington were 6th before we beat them. now they're 11th with 4 games in hand. play like we did against sunderland without the doz situation and we win more than we lose [Post edited 14 Nov 2020 21:24]
|
Bless you for arguing pointless statistics & sticking up for the Dortmund makeweight for 3 pages now, but I was hoping tonight’s hot thread might be a tad more exciting than the Portugal v France yawnfest. Any views on vegans, Trump, Corbyn, marble layered cake or COVID 19 that might spice my evening up a bit? Lambert out. |  | |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:16 - Nov 14 with 1406 views | TheTrueBlue1878 | Who said they were rubbish. Crewe were outstanding, MK were decent enough, but lacked cutting edge. Seems Cameron Jerome may help with them issues. |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:23 - Nov 14 with 1401 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 18:43 - Nov 14 by positivity | we were definitely going downhill that season. from 4 freak wins (1st) to relegation form (c21st) if 10 places over a whole season is a death spiral, what's 20 in less than that?! |
I shouldn’t bite as you’re obviously trolling, but those stats are made up. Even if the 4 wins at the start were removed we would still have finished comfortably outside the relegation zone, and several places higher than 21st, based on ppg from the remaining games |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:33 - Nov 14 with 1391 views | positivity |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:33 - Nov 14 by Seablu | Bless you for arguing pointless statistics & sticking up for the Dortmund makeweight for 3 pages now, but I was hoping tonight’s hot thread might be a tad more exciting than the Portugal v France yawnfest. Any views on vegans, Trump, Corbyn, marble layered cake or COVID 19 that might spice my evening up a bit? Lambert out. |
vegans good trump bad corbyn flawed marble layered cake good covid 19 bad dull but true, like the pointless stats! |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:37 - Nov 14 with 1384 views | positivity |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:16 - Nov 14 by TheTrueBlue1878 | Who said they were rubbish. Crewe were outstanding, MK were decent enough, but lacked cutting edge. Seems Cameron Jerome may help with them issues. |
the usual suspects on the chatroom, called them rubbish, "how can we even consider promotion if we can't easily beat lowly crewe/mk/insert-name-of-whichever-team-we're- playing-this-week"! |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:44 - Nov 14 with 1375 views | positivity |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:23 - Nov 14 by C_HealyIsAPleasure | I shouldn’t bite as you’re obviously trolling, but those stats are made up. Even if the 4 wins at the start were removed we would still have finished comfortably outside the relegation zone, and several places higher than 21st, based on ppg from the remaining games |
not trolling, just arguing against the hagiography of saint mick! 48/42 averages out at 52.5 points, which is sometimes relegation form, practically always lower than where we finished the season before, showing the decline of the club which was what we were considering |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 00:02 - Nov 15 with 1355 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:37 - Nov 14 by positivity | the usual suspects on the chatroom, called them rubbish, "how can we even consider promotion if we can't easily beat lowly crewe/mk/insert-name-of-whichever-team-we're- playing-this-week"! |
I can agree, certainly there have been occasions on here some think we should walk this league etc. Seems Jimmy Walker is of this false mindset. Think by what I have seen to date this season League 1 looks more competitive this year than last. That worries me because we finished 11th last. |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 00:21 - Nov 15 with 1351 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:44 - Nov 14 by positivity | not trolling, just arguing against the hagiography of saint mick! 48/42 averages out at 52.5 points, which is sometimes relegation form, practically always lower than where we finished the season before, showing the decline of the club which was what we were considering |
It was actually 44/38 for the rest of the season under McCarthy - which averaged across the season would have seen us avoid relegation by 12 points |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 00:43 - Nov 15 with 1339 views | Rocky | Crewe are probably one of the best passing teams in L1. They passed us off the park - unless you count the hundreds of pointless passes we made between central defence and goalkeeper. They lack real punch in attack - but if they solve that, they will be up there in the top 6. |  | |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 00:56 - Nov 15 with 1333 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 00:43 - Nov 15 by Rocky | Crewe are probably one of the best passing teams in L1. They passed us off the park - unless you count the hundreds of pointless passes we made between central defence and goalkeeper. They lack real punch in attack - but if they solve that, they will be up there in the top 6. |
Indeed. Darren Ferguson called them the best footballing side in League 1 ahead of their match today. I watch that one, dominated and passed Posh off the park. Left hand side of Kirk + Pickering was outstanding, Ryan Wintle in midfield ran the game, Luke Offord CB was the ultimate modern CB, quick, very comfortable on the ball, confident. However Mandron (former Col U) striker leads the line so well but doesn’t look at though he’ll score enough, very Ollie Hawkins esc. They were a joy and a pleasure to watch this afternoon. |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 01:07 - Nov 15 with 1330 views | jeera |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 22:33 - Nov 14 by positivity | vegans good trump bad corbyn flawed marble layered cake good covid 19 bad dull but true, like the pointless stats! |
I like Seablu and he and I tend to be on the same page on most things, but he's no right bringing [chocolate] marble layer cake into this. To be fair whenever this all crops up I think the truth is many of us are still in some kind of delayed shock. It's denial; none of us can honestly believe we are where we are so expect us to storm our way out of it. But when you look around the table there's some previously big names in there; ex-established Championship and Prem clubs and their fans must feel the same indignant way as we do. All equally delusional perhaps, but understandable. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 1:08]
|  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 02:08 - Nov 15 with 1304 views | Eireannach_gorm |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 21:19 - Nov 14 by positivity | then played his proper blokes ahead of them? that's the one! |
Nice swerve. |  | |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 09:20 - Nov 15 with 1240 views | jayessess |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 00:56 - Nov 15 by TheTrueBlue1878 | Indeed. Darren Ferguson called them the best footballing side in League 1 ahead of their match today. I watch that one, dominated and passed Posh off the park. Left hand side of Kirk + Pickering was outstanding, Ryan Wintle in midfield ran the game, Luke Offord CB was the ultimate modern CB, quick, very comfortable on the ball, confident. However Mandron (former Col U) striker leads the line so well but doesn’t look at though he’ll score enough, very Ollie Hawkins esc. They were a joy and a pleasure to watch this afternoon. |
Given the resources at Artell's disposal, what a damning indictment of the coaching set-up at Peterborough and Ipswich. |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 11:05 - Nov 15 with 1220 views | Vaughan8 | The standard of this league isn't very good. If we play to our max every game, i firmly believe we should beating most. However that is unlikely as it is with the other "top" teams. None of us are that good that we will go on a 10 match winning run. Crewe apparently did look decent so im not sure anyone was saying their not very good. |  | |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 11:29 - Nov 15 with 1209 views | pointofblue |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 11:05 - Nov 15 by Vaughan8 | The standard of this league isn't very good. If we play to our max every game, i firmly believe we should beating most. However that is unlikely as it is with the other "top" teams. None of us are that good that we will go on a 10 match winning run. Crewe apparently did look decent so im not sure anyone was saying their not very good. |
I think there was a question about are they good or did we make them look good. I’m sure the same discussion is currently being carried out on the Peterborough forum. |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 11:37 - Nov 15 with 1204 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 09:20 - Nov 15 by jayessess | Given the resources at Artell's disposal, what a damning indictment of the coaching set-up at Peterborough and Ipswich. |
Indeed, no real surprise. I know we’ve got an average manager with predominately average players. I think Posh have an average manager with better players. Resources available is fine, it’s how you use the resources. We clearly don’t have transfer fees, but wages are higher than the rest. That’s not a good thing, just another sign that we are overpaying average footballers who really should be on bang average wages at Shrewsbury/Swindon and co. |  |
|  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 11:39 - Nov 15 with 1202 views | patrickswell |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 19:41 - Nov 14 by jas0999 | We were very lucky to beat Crewe. Better side. |
But we took our chance and worked very hard against them. Unlike Sunderland and Lincoln, we didn’t have a referee deciding to fck Crewe over on a whim. We beat them, Sunderland and Lincoln beat us with a 12th man. |  | |  |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 12:15 - Nov 15 with 1192 views | jayessess |
crewe and mk were "rubbish teams" on 11:37 - Nov 15 by TheTrueBlue1878 | Indeed, no real surprise. I know we’ve got an average manager with predominately average players. I think Posh have an average manager with better players. Resources available is fine, it’s how you use the resources. We clearly don’t have transfer fees, but wages are higher than the rest. That’s not a good thing, just another sign that we are overpaying average footballers who really should be on bang average wages at Shrewsbury/Swindon and co. |
We have a very poor manager, probably the worst in the division. The jury's out on the players whilst that's the case. |  |
|  |
| |